🧵Just a few weeks ago, the House was ready to pass legislation prohibiting warrantless searches of Americans’ private communications under FISA 702.
A few House Republicans then created a fake “national security” distraction and convinced the House to adjourn.
Weeks later, the House appears ready to reauthorize FISA 702 — which has been abused literally hundreds of thousands of times to spy on Americans without a warrant — without requiring the government to get a warrant.
The government has lied, obfuscated, cheated, and manipulated FISA 702, depriving Americans of one of our core constitutional protections.
I call upon @SpeakerJohnson and every member of the House of Representatives to end this madness, and stop this cycle of abuse carried out by the deep state against the American people.
The warrant requirement is important, but other reforms are needed too. For example, the package of reforms presented in the “Lee-Leahy” proposal (which passed the Senate with 77 votes in 2020) would bring much-needed transparency to FISA, the absence of which has enabled abuse.
There are bipartisan reform bills in both houses of Congress that would correct the problem, including a bill I’ve introduced with @DickDurbin called the SAFE Act.
The SAFE Act contains a warrant requirement, the Lee-Leahy reforms, language ensuring that our Fourth Amendment rights can’t be bought and sold, and a handful of other protections necessary to protect Americans’s privacy. You can read about that bill here: lee.senate.gov/2024/3/lee-dur…
The House Judiciary Committee has produced a comparable bill that would likewise fix the problem, but @SpeakerJohnson has declined to bring that bill to the floor, opting instead to have members vote on a “compromise” measure—one that would compromise the rights of Americans if passed without amendments.
@SpeakerJohnson has indicated that he’ll allow the House to vote on a few amendments. I strongly encourage him and every House member to support the amendment requiring a warrant to protect Americans from warrantless surveillance under FISA 702.
I also strongly encourage @SpeakerJohnson to allow for a vote on, and advocate for passage of, an amendment containing the Lee-Leahy measures to provide much-needed transparency to the FISA process.
If these reforms are not adopted, I strongly encourage every member of the House to oppose the reauthorization of FISA 702 this week.
Please like and share if you agree, and implore your representatives to protect your Fourth Amendment rights, which the FISA 702 bill coming before the House this week would, if enacted without significant changes, leave dangerously undermined.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Those who fund proxy wars (from a safe distance) can easily convince themselves that, by outsourcing the fighting to others, they avoid moral accountability for the tragic and inevitable consequences of war.
The moral implications of a proxy war are especially heightened when those funding it profit from the war’s duration and intensity.
Where, for example, those funding a proxy war sell weapons to those doing the actual fighting, the former might encourage the latter to keep fighting—regardless of whether it’s in the latter’s interest to do so—discouraging efforts to bring the conflict to a peaceful end.
In the world of politics, nothing makes me happier than a candidate stump speech citing Wickard v. Filburn to explain what went wrong with the federal government.
The Commerce Clause can’t authorize Congress to everything without nullifying the Tenth Amendment—and the broader principle of federalism along with it—and doing that leads to the erosion of separation of powers between the three branches.
And yet since the Supreme Court effectively re-wrote the Commerce Clause during the New Deal Era, almost nothing has been beyond Congress’s authority.
On a first read, it fails to accomplish the following: 1. Fails to prohibit taxpayer funding from being able to be used to prosecute a presidential candidate 2. Fails to prohibit taxpayer funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or labs controlled by hostile governments.
3. Fails to prohibit taxpayer funding for mail-order chemical abortion drugs 4. Fails to prohibit taxpayer funds from being used to carry out Biden’s DEI EOs or USDA’s equity action plan 5. Fails to prohibit taxpayer funding for red flag laws
1. Just as the House was making progress on FISA reforms, the GOP “Intel Bros”demanded that the House adjourn—without reforming FISA 702 or even prohibiting warrantless “backdoor” searches of American citizens under FISA 702.
2. I stand by my prediction from December: the Intel Bros will likely (1) seek another FISA 702 certification from the FISA court between now and early April, and then (2) argue that 702 operations may proceed until 2025, even if 702 expires in mid-April. They’ll rely on this language from 2018:
3. If they don’t rely on the above-referenced language from 2018 (passed in the middle of the night as part of a shady-as-heck spending measure, as I recall), then the Intel Bros will almost certainly push to reauthorize FISA 702 in an omnibus spending bill—a shady one, no doubt.
🧵 1. The Senate rules allow for unlimited debate. Yesterday afternoon the Senate approved “cloture”—a motion to end debate on the Ukraine supplemental spending measure within 30 hours. Now we are in that post-cloture debate time.
2. Because Schumer advanced the Ukraine supplemental on an unrelated piece of legislation, the Senate faces one more cloture motion to end debate at a time certain. Republicans continue to ask for amendments but are still being blocked.
3. Republicans can still stop this if they want to. They don’t have to vote for cloture tonight. The bill, as drafted, doesn’t have to pass. We can still pass germane amendments (I personally have many of them) that would at least make the bill less harmful than it is now.
1. The Senate is voting right now on my motion to table the procedural device Chuck Schumer is using to prevent the Senate from considering amendments to the Ukraine bill.
I’m going to list just a few of the amendments he’s trying to kill—without even a vote.
2. Senator Rubio has an amendment to place illegal immigrants convicted of DUI into expedited removal proceedings.
3. Senator Tuberville has an amendment to end catch and release. He also has an amendment to stop categorical immigration parole.