Lisa Rubin Profile picture
Apr 9 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
NEW: Months ago, Judge Aileen Cannon ordered the unsealing of materials attached to Trump's motion for more discovery materials in the Mar a Lago docs case. Among the information to be unsealed were the names of nearly 24 witnesses--so the government asked her to reconsider. 1/
She has now ruled on that motion for reconsideration, and while chastising the Special Counsel for its failure to abide by local procedural rules and raise certain arguments and facts earlier, she concedes those witness names shouldn't become public record after all. 2/

gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.438.0.pdf ()courtlistener.com
But the decision's not entirely a win. The Special Counsel's office also asked that she not unseal the prior statements of potential government witnesses, which were provided to the defense months even though under the pertinent statute, the feds were not obligated to do so. 3/
Cannon says redactions to those statements are OK to ensure witnesses' identities are not compromised; the parties should not only redact dates of birth, Social Security numbers, email addresses, and phone numbers, but should also protect "professional titles; detailed biographical or professional background information . . . and other specific information which would obviously and directly identify a potential witness."
But the substantive content of those statements? Those will be fully public--and my guess is that their publication will fuel needless speculation about who said what, notwithstanding her allowance for some redactions. 5/
Some former prosecutors in my orbit had predicted that if Cannon denied the motion for reconsideration, thereby forcing the revelation of witness names, the Special Counsel would take an immediate appeal to the 11th Circuit & might ask for Cannon's removal too. 6/
But that's not what happened tonight--and it's unclear to me what Smith does next, especially considering that their biggest concern -- the safety of witnesses and the integrity of their testimony -- appears to have been addressed. Watch this space. FIN.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lisa Rubin

Lisa Rubin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawofruby

May 3
NEW: We just took a brief break because the most composed woman in Trump’s orbit — Hope Hicks — broke down on the stand right as cross examination started. Why would Hicks burst into tears—and why is she struggling to keep it together now? 1/
There are a couple of theories floating around among journalists watching with me. One is that being asked about the Trump family — who plucked her from a private PR firm & turned her into a star — overwhelmed her. Her affection for Trump the man is still evident.
The other is darker. Hicks isn’t out to hurt Trump, but today, she revealed that Trump shared with her that he spoke with Cohen in Feb. 2018, the morning after Cohen told @nytimes that he paid Stormy Daniels without Trump’s knowledge.
Read 9 tweets
May 3
Hi, friends. I am already in my seat at 100 Centre, where photos are verboten. But when court resumes at 9:30 am, a specialist in digital forensics will be back on the stand, defending the integrity of the data the DA’s office downloaded from Michael Cohen’s phones. 1/
And from there, where we go is anyone’s guess—but keep in mind that the DA’s case has two major components, separated in time and place(s). 2/
The first is the alleged conspiracy between Trump, Pecker, Cohen, and others to promote Trump’s election through “unlawful means.” The second, which starts months later, is Trump’s alleged cover up of that conspiracy by making or causing others to make false business records. 3/
Read 13 tweets
May 3
NEW: I know many Trump trial watchers are still knee deep in the world of Keith Davidson, where lurid details about people like Hulk Hogan, Charlie Sheen & Lindsay Lohan are bought and sold like candy. But the weirdest moment for me was the cross of a guy who does cell phone data extraction for the DA. 1/
That guy, a career computer forensics analyst and an Iraqi war veteran, was supposed to be there to authenticate data taken off two cell phones provided to the DA by Michael Cohen. He struck me as knowledgeable, earnest, and honest. 2/
But for a defense looking to sow seeds of mistrust — and in need of only one juror — even that guy is ripe for a brutal cross. How, you ask? By suggesting that Cohen’s devices or data — including the 9/16 recording of his convo with Trump — could have been manipulated and/or deleted by the FBI. 3/Image
Read 4 tweets
May 2
NEW: In court, Keith Davidson reads aloud a statement he drafted on 2/13/18 to be sent to Chris Cuomo, then of CNN, at a time he understood Cohen was "under some fire and wanted some validation." 1/
He wrote, in part: "I read today that Michael Cohen reports that the source of the $130,000 paid to Ms. Clifford was from his own personal funds. That assertion is in complete harmony with what he informed me of at the time of the transaction." 2/
Why does that matter? According to the statement of facts, Cohen and Trump met in person, in the Oval Office, four days later on Feb. 17, 2017 . . . to solidify the arrangement Cohen and Weisselberg devised to repay Cohen.
Read 6 tweets
May 2
NEW: With court starting in 20 minutes, we'll start with a hearing on Trump's newest alleged gag order violations. But when Keith Davidson comes back, he'll get into his constant, frenetic texts over Stormy's story -- and silence -- just days before Election Day '16. 1/
Expect Davidson to be questioned over his now-infamous text to Howard on Election Night: "What have we done?" Image
Davidson might also be asked to explain why, weeks later, he seemed piqued that he had not obtained inaugural tickets. After all, hadn't he and Howard done the ultimate favor to the campaign? Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
NEW: This is the fourth Trump trial I’ve attended regularly. But I have never seen anything like the phenomenon we’re witnessing the morning. 1/
The witness testifying now, Philip Thompson, works for a deposition services company that acquired TSG Reporting, a well-known court reporting and deposition transcription services company in Manhattan. And he, like the witness before him, had to fly to New York to testify. 2/
Each of them were here solely to authenticate excerpts from videos of Trump speaking, one group aired on C-SPAN (which is entrusted to air live proceedings of Congress) and the other from Trump’s own Oct. 2022 deposition in the E. Jean Carroll case. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(