Allen Weisselberg is awaiting his sentencing for perjuring himself during Trump's civil fraud case investigation and trial.
We already know the outcome: five months in jail, per his plea deal.
I'll be covering the proceedings.
Some quick background before the proceedings:
* Weisselberg, the ex-Trump Org CFO, was a co-defendant in the civil fraud case.
* He previously served a brief stint in Rikers in a separate tax fraud case.
* That other case was before Justice Merchan, but this isn't.
There's another tie to the civil fraud case.
NYAG Tish James says that Weisselberg's plea indicates indicates that it's supported by incriminating emails her office doesn't have.
Back in civil court, the AG's team wants Justice Engoron to determine whether Trump, his co-defendants and their lawyers "facilitated" Weisselberg's perjury by withholding incriminating documents.
It's unclear whether any of that related litigation in the civil case will come up in criminal court during sentencing.
Proceedings are about to begin.
Justice Laurie Peterson is presiding.
Allen Weisselberg approaches the defense table, dressed in comfortable, loose-fitting attire, seemingly ready for more jail time.
Justice Peterson:
Mr. Weisselberg, is there anything you would like to say?
Weisselberg:
No, your honor.
Weisselberg is handcuffed behind his back and escorted out of the courtroom.
That's it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump's attorneys are currently arguing AGAIN to delay his New York criminal trial at an appellate court — this time, on the immunity and other issues.
By the DA's count, that's more than 10 attempts to adjourn his trial.
One of the grounds cited by Trump's lawyer Emil Bove now:
Justice Merchan ordered that the parties must receive permission to file any more 11th hour pretrial motions.
Bove calls them "unacceptable and unconstitutional restrictions on our ability to file defense motions."
Bove pivots to the presidential immunity arguments.
He notes that Trump's argument here is "different" than the one in D.C.
"This argument is evidence of official acts cannot be offered at criminal trial against a former president."
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's prosecutors skewer Trump's latest effort to seek Justice Merchan's recusal, through a "daisy chain of innuendos" about the judge's daughter.
Trump's attorneys have argued that the judge has a conflict of interest because of his daughter's position at Authentic Campaigns, a digital marketing agency allegedly doing work for entities associated with his rivals.
The DA said that Team Trump didn't provide citations.
What's more, they say, it's the same position the judge rejected last year with approval from the state's top judicial ethics body.
"A relative's independent political activities do not provide a reasonable basis to question the judge's impartiality," that committee found.
The Manhattan DA tells the judge that Trump's "dangerous, violent, and reprehensible rhetoric fundamentally threatens the integrity of these proceedings," in a new filing urging him to expand the gag order.
Bragg on Trump posting a photo of Justice Merchan's daughter
"There is no constitutional right to target the family of this Court, let alone on the blatant falsehoods that have served as the flimsiest pretexts [...] Defendant knows what he is doing, and everyone else does too."
Bragg:
"Defendant’s claim of a constitutional right to levy personal attacks on family members is as disturbing as it is wrong."
Manhattan DA Bragg fires a shot across the bow, telling the judge that the "properly read" gag order prohibits Trump from attacking the judge's daughter.
He wants the judge to "warn" Trump to stop, under threat of contempt sanctions.
It's worth reviewing the express terms of the gag order to see the legal fight ahead: It bars Trump from attacking "the family members of any counsel or staff member," setting up a fight over who's a counsel or staff member.
Most saliently here, does it include the judge? 🧵
Bragg answers yes, and adds its also includes *his* family members, even though the gag order allows Trump to attack him personally.
Trump's lawyers claimed that the order seeking permission to file violated his Sixth Amendment rights.
But the judge noted they agreed the court has the authority to "manage its docket and prevent 'dilatory tactics' right up until the eve of trial."
"[Trump], either directly or through counsel, has repeatedly stated publicly that the defense goal is to delay these proceedings, if possible, past the 2024 presidential election."