NEW: I am awaiting the beginning of Allen Weisselberg’s sentencing hearing following his recent plea to perjuring himself in connection with the NY Attorney General’s civil fraud trial. Weisselberg is here & dressed in athleisure. That matters because? 1/
It is often a sign that a defendant expects to go straight from sentencing to jail. 2/
Assuming Judge Laurie Peterson imposes the sentence contemplated in the plea agreement, Weisselberg will be sentenced to 5 months. The ADA, Gary Fishman, just said there’s no reason to deviate from that sentence. 3/
Asked whether he has anything to say, Weisselberg says only, “No, Your Honor.” And almost as quickly as it began, Weisselberg is cuffed and escorted out of the courtroom through a back entrance, on his way presumably to Rikers. 4/
All we are waiting for now is for Weisselberg’s lawyers, Seth Rosenberg and Thomas Rotko, to leave the courtroom. 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some have asked me whether Hope Hicks will testify truthfully if called as a witness in the Manhattan DA's criminal trial. Hicks is no stranger to talking to government investigators--and her history suggests she'll be forthcoming. 1/
Consider this snippet from a 12/17 FBI interview. Yes, it's heavily redacted--but indicates "the only other time" Hicks had seen Trump as angry as he was when Mueller was appointed was "when the Access Hollywood tape came out during the campaign." 2/
In June 2019, when Hicks was before the House Judiciary Committee, she was also asked about her knowledge of and involvement in the settlements with Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. She testified that she was never present "when Trump and Cohen discussed Stormy Daniels." 3/
Trump's third request for a stay of the hush money trial in as many days has now been denied. And each of those hearings, he has been in front of a different judge in the Appellate Division, First Department. 1/
That made me wonder: How many of the judges on that bench have had to rule on motions or appeals in Trump's cases this year? 2/
The answer, by my count, is at least 14 of them since June 2023. There are only 21 judges on that court.
NEW: Months ago, Judge Aileen Cannon ordered the unsealing of materials attached to Trump's motion for more discovery materials in the Mar a Lago docs case. Among the information to be unsealed were the names of nearly 24 witnesses--so the government asked her to reconsider. 1/
She has now ruled on that motion for reconsideration, and while chastising the Special Counsel for its failure to abide by local procedural rules and raise certain arguments and facts earlier, she concedes those witness names shouldn't become public record after all. 2/
But the decision's not entirely a win. The Special Counsel's office also asked that she not unseal the prior statements of potential government witnesses, which were provided to the defense months even though under the pertinent statute, the feds were not obligated to do so. 3/
Tonight, Trump's team released their 37-page recusal motion. That means that Merchan -- who ordered last month that both sides need his express permission before filing further pre-trial motions -- allowed them to do so. 1/
Trump's justification for a second recusal motion, after his first motion was denied last August, is that there are both changed circumstances and newly discovered evidence. 2/
Recall also that the standard for recusal that Trump's team has invoked necessitates finding that the judge knew or should have known his daughter has an interest that would be substantially affected by this case. 3/
Earlier today, the New York Attorney General filed a motion seeking more information about Trump's $175 million bond in their case. But they're also apparently going at the issue sideways as well through a letter sent to Judge Arthur Engoron tonight. 1/
Specifically, that letter asks Engoron to modify his post-trial order concerning the powers and duties of the independent monitor in two ways. One of the AG's requests is that Engoron clarify that the monitor can communicate with any of the parties ex parte -- meaning, without all sides present. The AG's proposed order is here: 2/
Why would it matter if the AG's team has the unfettered right to speak to retired federal judge Barbara Jones without Trump's team present? Because, as I detailed last night, under the monitorship order, Jones is entitled to information about the bond that is not yet public.
Per @Tom_Winter, a Lancaster, NY man is now in custody after being charged for threatening New York Attorney General Letitia James, who prevailed in her civil fraud trial against former President Trump and whose contact information he found online, with death or injury unless she dropped her case against Trump. 1/
The man also sent threatening voice mail to Judge Arthur Engoron, who presided over that trial, telling the judge he would go after him if an “innocent” Trump were to be imprisoned or to lose his properties as a result of the case and calling the judge “un-American” for his role. 2/
When participants in our justice system, like Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, insist that gag orders are necessary and urgent, arrests like this one are critical context. 3/