Michael Singh Profile picture
Apr 14 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
What can we learn from the Iranian attack on Israel, and what is likely to happen next? My thoughts...1/
Iran's attack on Israel was massive and unprecedented. However, it was also well-telegraphed, slow-moving, and played to Israeli defensive strengths. Iran likely hoped a few missiles would get through and cause damage/deaths, which they could then trumpet as a great success. 2/
We can see this in Iran's messaging. They falsely claimed (before missiles had even arrived) to have destroyed key targets; they claimed to have fired just "tens" of missiles, to project higher success rate than actually achieved; and they immediately called for deescalation. 3/
But Iran failed to surmount even this low bar. The attack failed utterly, highlighted Israel's close military coordination with regional and int'l partners, and arguably undermined its own deterrence. 4/
Iran's attack not only relieved, at least for now, Israel's isolation over Gaza, but exposed the cynicism of Russia and China, both of which sought to justify Iranian actions even as they called for Israel not to respond. This will diminish their prestige in the Middle East. 5/
There is a temptation to allow Iran's failure to be the last word. It has arguably succeeded twice over - first in its reported operation against the IRGC in Damascus, and second by Iran falling flat on its face in its attempted response. However...6/
But Israel will feel compelled to respond - as @dstroul noted, it can't allow direct attacks to go unanswered or to be normalized. And it will want not just to defeat the attack physically but show Iran its claimed new strategy of responding directly against Israel is unwise. 7/
The question before Israel is whether to respond in a way that is sharp but leaves room for deescalation; or whether to use this as an opportunity to pursue wider goals such as strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The latter likely requires a measure of US buy-in, however. 8/
For its part, however, the Biden admin would likely prefer Israel not respond. Hence the unusual step of convening G7 heads of state this morning. However, Israel is unlikely to see a diplomatic initiative as an acceptable substitute for a military response. /End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Singh

Michael Singh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelSinghDC

Oct 5, 2023
A few thoughts on this letter. First, it is certainly not the case that the US signs defense treaties only with democracies - the Philippines was not in 1951, nor was South Korea in 1953, and I imagine the list goes on - others can elaborate. 1/
2/ Like other treaties from decades past, a US-Saudi pact would bind an important partner closer to the US at a time of rising geopolitical competition, provide security advantages to both sides, and send a deterrent message to adversaries. 2/
3/ The nuclear issue is one that demands supreme caution, but one which is also not binary - there are multiple ways that the US and Saudi Arabia can cooperate in the nuclear realm, and we should only consider those that clearly benefit the US. More to come on this from me. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10, 2023
China hosting talks leading to the normalization of Iran-Saudi ties is not insignificant, but I think that Beijing's role and the implications thereof are being exaggerated. 1/
More than anything, it reflects Beijing's ambition to be seen as a diplomatic player in the region - it has frequently hosted delegations from the Middle East and hoped to sponsor peace talks, mostly without significant impact. 2/
In this case - unlike, say, in China's efforts to sponsor Israeli-Palestinian talks - Beijing benefited from the fact that it is one of few countries willing to host Iranians that is also respected by the Saudis. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(