Now that this episode of 🇮🇱-🇮🇷 tit-for-tat has concluded, some thoughts:
💢 At the surface level,
1) Iran has successfully reestablished the deterrence that had become severely compromised since Oct 7th— due to its own strategic patience & desire to avoid war with the US.
2) Israel's Iron Dome & missile defense worked as intended & intercepted most of Iranian attacks receiving minimal damage & zero casualties.
➡This should give both sides room to avoid further escalation⚡
💢 On the deeper level,
1) The Attacks were not a surprise neither in form nor timing-wise: they appear to have been coordinated with the Biden Administration in advance, giving the US/allies ample time to deploy additional resources to complement Israel's own defenses & repel bulk of the attacks. Still, Iran was able to successfully hit the couple airbases in Negev desert that it had specifically targeted & claims were directly involved in the bombing of its embassy. That's too precise to be a coincidence. Either the US allowed it to happen as a prior agreement, or the Iranians are flexing their missile maneuverability, using the cover of the barrage to actually hit the targets they choose.
2) The higher than anticipated number of missiles launched by Iran was a signal of Iran's capability to launch multiple forms of projectiles simultaneously, and to further highlight Israel's dependency on US assistance to repel even this more limited barrage. Iran reaped a psychological victory of blanketing Israeli skies with missiles while warning that the next attack, were things to escalate, would be many times more severe & of course an actual surprise with potential to actually penetrate into Israel.
3) The decision not to target a single one of many US bases in the region (that are now obv strategic liabilities for Washington) was clearly deliberate as to emphasize that Iran & the US are not at war. This is held over the US as a potential threat if Biden fails to rein in Israel in the future or, worse, assist Israel with attacks on Iranian soil.
4) Israel is not a monolith, & Netanyahu's utter failure in Gaza to either secure the hostages or to actually eliminate Hamas (impossible goal) on top of his provocative actions against Iran bringing the specter of ultimate existential war to Israel is rousing the good decent people of Israel against him & the extremists around him. Those holding 🇮🇱 government accountable for its action will ultimately be the Israelis themselves, but 🇮🇷 attack is a wake-up call that the current path is a dead-end.
5) Iran's insistence on ceasefire in Gaza as an off-ramp for the attack, knowing full well that Netanyahu would not abide, is a testament to the Iranian expertise in hybrid wars. This was a diplomatic win that raised its profile in the Arab world, undermined Arab governments' legitimacy & exposed empty Turkish rhetoric on Israel. Tehran's follow-through on its words was something Arabs haven't seen from their own states (one reason for Hamas' rising popularity among Arabs); this could prove inspiring in the Arab Street.
6) The United States kept its word to protect Israel against its enemies. But demonstrated that its commitments to Israelis security will be only defensive. The Iranian display of strength has made it all but clear that the US has no interest in an all-out regional war in an election year, with Biden touting a “united Diplomatic response” to Iran's attack and telling Bibi not to engage in a further overt military response. In other words, if Israel decides to go on the offensive, it'll have do so alone.
7) Despite the DC Anti-Iran brigade's immediate bluster calling for strikes against 🇮🇷 nuclear sites, the coordination & proportionality of the attacks suggest a degree of acceptance re Iran's right to self-defense against Israeli provocations. The administration will likely push for sanctions on Iran's ballistic missile program, but we may have just avoided WWIII this time around—if by a hair!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
US alliances today are maintained out of a perception of their value among the foreign policy establishment rather their actual contribution to core US interests.
US Alliances are identified with US global hegemony & both are seen as ends in themselves. We need a phenomenology.
Despite many valid critiques by restrainers & realists over the material costs of permanent alliances & risks of US entrapment in foreign conflicts, the Blob favors Continuity over change.
Why? Bc there are non-material factors at play here that are wedded to the status quo.
🚨 In our latest IPD white paper by @ChrisDMott, we review the latest rebrand of the neoliberal martial regime as the "woke imperium".
Systemic adoption of the prevailing moralist trend—'Woke' rhetoric & language of justice—is an ideological cover for US interventionism abroad.
Systemic use of moralism in the American national security apparatus has been promoted, & become entrenched, by a highly competitive professional class vying to secure their institutional position by using virtue signaling to demonstrate class solidarity to their higher ranks.
Selective weaponization of the "cause of justice" serves the imperial/economic needs of a globalist regime that justifies its expansionism & primacy in the name of Progress—as the triumph of a universalized American conception of virtue over those it views as reactionary.
Typically smart article by @Tinkzorg@compactmag_ rightly notes that maintaining any empire needs sustaining imperial networks of patronage which US is materially failing at but IMO the totalistic mindcontroling evolution of the Imperium is no coincidence compactmag.com/article/pride-…
Cultivation of cosmopolitan bourgeois elites across major societies has a profound effect with the liberal Western elites in role of norm-setter. Such control over access via ideological lipservice creates a prestige-hegemony feedback loop offering a patronage of different kind.
This new patronage is more ideational, psychological, and sociological than a customary economic one but no less powerful. It is also more noxious in short-term bc local intelligensia actively participates in eroding cultural sovereignty & pushing liberal homogeneity.
The Establishment moves seamlessly from generating hysteria around 1 crisis to another. This isnt about the crisis; it isn't about 🇺🇦 or 🇷🇺 or Covid; each is simply an opportunity for fear-mongering using our baser instincts. Reaction-wise, the parallels are eerie & striking. 1
Russia is the new Covid. Our policy: Quarantine the country; block it off with sanctions that won't work to stop the virus (sorry war). Russians are the new unvaxxed—cancel & demonize the whole population. You didnt notice the pandemic was over bc a new one has already started. 2
No matter the crisis, PMC has the same MO: 1) existentialize 2) moralize 3) Use invented pandemonium to weaponize language 4) securitize the state for maximum compliance. Only a regime suffering from a severe legitimacy crisis needs these sorts of ritualistic pledges of fealty. 3