Tomas Hirst Profile picture
Apr 15 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The US fiscal stance is potentially necessary but by itself insufficient as an explanation for persistent econ resilience. Apparent inconsistency between the credit cycle and business cycle is a multi-causal phenomenon worthy of more nuanced commentary
Pandemic transfers buffered balance sheets of some of the most vulnerable households as hike cycle started because they had just paid down a load of revolving debt. And consumption implications are different in curtailed leverage vs disorderly deleveraging cycles.
Mortgage refi story well covered, but in effect whole swathe of middle/upper income brackets knocked out interest costs at cycle lows and now sitting pretty on the result. Corps in aggregate did something similar - though w/shorter lock-ups.
Cumulative revenue growth over the past three years have largely swamped increases in debt service costs - blunting corp delevering impulse - even if rate of change has now shifting in the other direction.
Increasingly of the view that consumer credit is largely a coincident indicator of household balance sheet health rather than a leading indicator. Has provided a lot of false signals in this cycle as default rates “normalized”.
The question that’s on my mind now is how slow (in NGDP terms) can the economy run to keep the current constellation of data (strong labor market; cooling inflation; benign financial conditions) going? And where’s the upper limit for the Fed?
For ~5.3% rates to sustain you’re going to need a nominal growth rate in excess of 6%. And even if we’re generous on the productivity side, hard to see a number like that being consistent with anywhere near 2% inflation. But ~3.5% short rate and 5% NGDP? Seems plausible…
Or, phrased differently, it’s hard to see how short rates could shift *below* ~3.5% on a world where NGDP hasn’t slowed to closer to ~4% YoY on a sustained basis.
But the above maths also suggests bar for hikes here is (justifiably in my view) being set very high by the FOMC. It’s not just a real rates logic, it’s an aggregate leverage incentive logic. That may shift over time depending on growth dynamic but holds true for now at least.
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tomas Hirst

Tomas Hirst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomashirstecon

Sep 18, 2023
Strongly recommend listening to this in some ways as a piece with the excerpt from Romney’s biography in the Atlantic. Trivially, they’re similar in that both Stewart and Romney fell out with the parties they felt/feel deeply emotionally and intellectually associated with
More significantly, though, in both cases they both try on versions of “it was better to try to save the project from within the tent than be a powerless external critic” even where the risk was clearly going to be one of looking complicit in what subsequently happened.
And there’s a certain naivety to that that we’re invited to find charming and/or even noble. But it also illustrates that they entirely misread the moment in a way that maybe should at least make us question their judgement.
Read 9 tweets
May 20, 2023
There is a line on here particularly from some *cough* former Tory advisers currently gainfully employed in the financial sector that austerity can’t be blamed for the woes that the U.K. is currently experiencing. Worth thinking about what that implies.
That the extent of the planned cuts ultimately failed to materialise is just pointing at the failure of the policy (the expected efficiencies weren’t there and lots of cuts turned out to be false economies) and ex post claiming it as vindication.
Osborne then chose not to chase down his deficit targets by slashing and burning even more. That was the right decision but again mostly just illustrated the folly of the targets in the first place.
Read 6 tweets
May 19, 2023
Still getting a lot of this and it’s obviously bad faith at this point. Where there is potential legal remedy to the current impasse, there’s arguably an *obligation* on the executive to use it rather than allow a default.
“We thought it might look too silly to issue high coupon bonds/consoles so we decided to let the treasury market go into freefall” isn’t a reasonable case to make. If Biden team really aren’t willing to make policy concessions under this threat they have to be looking at this.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 6, 2023
Why does so much “serious” macro start with drawing silly arbitrary lines on a chat and calling it potential?
Anyway this is all very time-series macro and hand-waivy. Can agree that U.K. has some unique constraints that are lowering supply potential but not clear they’re addressed particularly well here bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/fi…
How do you rescue the MPC’s own inflation forecast (which has headline falling below target through the forecast period) from this analysis?
Read 4 tweets
Nov 21, 2022
The rush to "normalise" rates in Europe is increasingly divorced from any economic justification. Evidence we are getting from negotiated wage settlements are showing one-off front-loaded jumps before resetting to normal(ish) growth thereafter. Econ is slowing. Energy still risk.
Idea that a soft(ish) landing in '23 provides scope for higher terminal rate than currently priced gets the logic here backwards - if energy prices come down, and econ isn't too damaged then ECB no longer needs to chase headline HICP for fear of second round effects.
This shouldn't be controversial. Private sector demand has still not recovered from the pandemic, wages do not look like they're running away, energy prices are de facto policy tightening anyway, ECB just making things worse. We *want* this cycle to end with lower terminal rate.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
Contrary to the way it tends to be discussed outside of finance, markets really don't like elevated levels of volatility. It impacts (backwards looking) risk measures, which make trading more costly and limits scope to deploy leverage. Market would like a period of calm in the UK
Some investors may have delivered outsize performance due to some of the recent moves but you want it to be a one-off. The more the UK stands out from the crowd, the tighter liquidity conditions are likely to remain and the harder it's going to be to stabilize conditions.
That's why today was so underwhelming. Truss did not deliver enough to convince people of calm waters ahead. And the BoE is planning to stay out of the gilt market next week (and to actively sell down holdings from the end of the month). Not the time for half measures.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(