Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
Apr 16, 2024 35 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Good morning from New York.

We're gearing up for the second day of jury selection in Trump's criminal case in New York. Some nine jurors passed through the initial screening round, though none are empaneled, yet.

I'm reporting live from the courthouse every day. Follow here.
Per pool at 8:34 a.m. ET:

"Motorcade is on the move."
For my written reporting:

I will periodically fire off quick dispatches, and longer analytical pieces, on the trial for @Just_Security.

You can find the former category here. (Bookmark it!)

A more analytical dive here. justsecurity.org/daily-courtroo…
justsecurity.org/94560/trump-tr…
Throughout the trial, I'll report what I saw in the courtroom after proceedings adjourn on @MSNBC's @TheLastWord with @Lawrence. Be sure to tune in!

Last night, we discussed how the judge threaded the needle on Trump's pre-trial rulings.

ICYMI msnbc.com/the-last-word/…
8:50 a.m. ET:

"Motorcade has arrived," per CNN's @JWinterNY in the press pool
9:21 a.m.

"Prosecutors from the Manhattan DA’s office have arrived in the courtroom, carrying a couple boxes of documents," per pooler @StewartBishop
A reminder:

During jury selection, seating inside the main courthouse is severely constrained, and only a handful of pool reporters will observe from the actual courtroom.

Those positions rotate, and most of us observe voir dire via CCTV.

Access expands come trial time.
That's because the hundreds of potential jurors, in smaller increments of less than 100, fill up the seating in the pews of the gallery.

Proceedings are scheduled to start at 9:30 a.m., "sharp," every day, per the judge's instructions.

We're a minute away from that deadline.
Right on time, Trump entered the courtroom at 9:30 a.m.

"While he walked down the aisle, he winked at one of the court officers and mouthed 'how are you?'" per pooler @eorden.

"He looked straight ahead as he walked, then took a seat at the defense table."
Trump is seated between his attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who are both alumni of the Southern District of New York's U.S. Attorney's office.
Well, some 10 minutes later, that 9:30 a.m. "sharp" is now just an aspirational memory.

Standby.
"All rise."

Justice Juan Merchan takes the bench, and the attorneys for the parties register their appearances.
Merchan explains the 15 minute delay: "waiting on some jurors."

They are still waiting on three jurors, of whom two were in the box.

One, who reported flu-like symptoms, has been excused.
A potential juror who self-reported that he may have "unconscious bias" because of Republican relatives has been excused.
Another juror self-reports that he thought about it and may not be able to be impartial.

Excused.
A potential juror says she dated a lawyer for a while.

"It ended... fine," she adds, with a slight pause, to fairly uproarious laughter in the overflow room.
Another potential juror answers in response to this question.

"I feel that no one is above the law." Do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about whether a former president may be criminally charged in state court?
This juror says that he's read "Art of the Deal," "How to Be Rich," and struggles with the third, to laughter in the overflow room.
Another juror:

"I believe that no one is above the law."

Third response of its kind.
In response to a question asking her opinion about Trump's treatment in the case, she says that she believes Trump's being treated "fairly."

After conceding that she may not be able to be impartial, she is excused.
With the jury out of the room, Trump agrees that he has waived his right to be present at sidebars. That solves a logistical problem involving Secret Service raised by the judge on Monday.
Press pool dispatch via @EOrden:

"Trump appeared to be looking at the prospective jurors in the jury box as they each answered 'yes' to Steinglass’s question about whether they would be able to return a guilty verdict. Trump tilted his head once or twice as they were answering."

This is from the ADA's questioning, and he also made clear the jurors must hold prosecutors to their burden of proof.
Note—

Prosecutors and the defense each have 30 minutes to conduct voir dire.

Questioning for the People: Joshua Steinglass

For Trump: Todd Blanche
Asked about his feelings about Trump, a juror tells attorney Todd Blanche:

"If we were sitting in a bar, I'd be happy to tell you."

But the juror says that his political views are not relevant to this criminal case.

"They're apples and oranges."
The juror then discloses that he's Democrat, but he adds again that this affiliation is not relevant.

"It does not matter what my view is [...] I can compartmentalize."
A juror tells Blanche that he was a "big fan of 'The Apprentice.'"

He says there were things he agreed with and disagreed with about Trump.
Blanche keeps pressing jurors on their options about Trump.

Another responds: "He was our president," adding he agreed with and disagreed with certain things about him.
Another:

"I agree with the others about separating politics" from what goes on in this courtroom.
Another:

Any feelings about him are "inconsequential" to this trial.

"Feelings are not facts."
Another, with a genuine tone of wonder:

"I find him fascinating!"
Justice Merchan before this began:

"[T]he purpose of jury selection is not to determine
whether a prospective juror does or does not like one of the parties. Such questions are irrelevant because they do not go to the issue of the prospective juror's qualifications."

Several jurors seem to agree.Image
Todd Blanche quips that it might be difficult to talk about Trump: "He's right here."

A potential juror interjects mid-sentence:

"I don't think it's difficult. Not to cut you off."
Another potential juror says of Trump:

"He speaks his mind. He stirs the pot."

She says that "everyone judges him for speaking his mind."

She adds later: "I wanna say some things, but my mother said, 'Be nice!'"
Questioning by attorneys for both parties has ended.

The jurors exit the courtroom for the parties to begin their next round of screening.
Typo:

* a Democrat, or Democratic

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

May 21
This isn’t a legal document.

It’s a PR document that in parts contradicts how the legal document reveals how the fund will actually operate.

Some examples 🧵⬇️
PR Document: "There is no partisan restriction."

Here's how the plainly partisan way in which the legal document defines the "representative" conduct. Image
PR Document: Trump, his family and the Trump Organization won't receive any monetary compensation or damages from it.

Half-true, but there's a big asterisk: "Claimants can include entities," which is why sources told ABC News that Trump's entities could apply. Image
Read 13 tweets
May 20
The “confidential investigation documents” that Patel evasively alludes to is Volume II of the Jack Smith report, per the indictment.

It’s the only special counsel final report in US history that’s not been publicly released, as a result of Judge Cannon’s order at Trump’s urging.Image
Lineberger's case was filed in the Southern District of Florida's Fort Pierce division, virtually guaranteeing a favorable judicial assignment for Trump DOJ.

Instead of Cannon, the case goes to newly minted Judge Ed Artau, who has this tangled history. politico.com/news/2025/06/2…
Read 5 tweets
May 6
Trump DOJ opposes the release of SPLC grand jury transcripts, but what the memo *doesn't* say speaks volumes. Feds don't dispute the SPLC's account of the Trump admin's "gross misrepresentations" about the informant program.

Instead, the US Attorney says that's "not relevant."

Why that matters.🧵Moreover, the public comments in question—whether the SPLC ever shared information obtained by its field sources with law enforcement—are simply not relevant to the charges in the indictment. This case is about fraudulently obtaining money from donors, lying to banks, and concealing payments to the same organizations the SPLC publicly told donors they were fighting against. (Doc. 1 at 3–6). What, if anything, the SPLC did with the information it obtained through field sources is not relevant to the charges.
The SPLC's motion seeking the grand jury records rattled off a series of "false statements" by Trump and his surrogates about Charlottesville and the informants program.

The group said info gathered there thwarted a terrorist attack and led to arrests. allrisenews.com/p/splc-tipped-…
Debunking Trump's revisionist history of Charlottesville, SPLC said it handed the FBI a 45-page “Event Alert” with informant-gathered information.

The dossier tipped off agents about the names, photos, criminal histories and "weapons of choice of the people there."
Read 6 tweets
Apr 23
By the DOJ's own account, the SPLC's informant program was cheap and effective.

For a fraction of a *percentage* of their annual budget, SPLC penetrated the nation's worst hate groups and published their secrets with info from their turncoats.

The DOJ's case assumes donors felt defrauded by this. buff.ly/cwTnYg6
The Trump DOJ alleges that the SPLC spent about $3 million on informants over the course of a *decade.*

Check out of the SPLC's revenue and expenditures from 2024, the last fiscal year records were public. That's a typical year, and it's a drop in the bucket. projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
In return, SPLC infiltrated the KKK, the neo-Nazis, and other extremist groups, and they shared their secrets with federal law enforcement until Kash Patel put an end to that last October.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14
Two Trump appointees on the D.C. Circuit panel blocked Boasberg from even INVESTIGATING contempt of court related to the March 2025 flights to El Salvador.

The dissent: "Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands."

Opinions buff.ly/4kr3ALC"Contempt of court is a public offense, and the fate of our democratic republic will depend on whether we treat it as such. In the many forms in which it can be committed, contempt degrades the power that the People, through their Constitution and Congress, gave the federal courts. Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands. For contempt offends not only the authority of whichever judge has been subjected to such incursions, but it also offends our system of governance. Addressing contempt is, therefore, a responsibility that is...
This is the second time Judges Rao and Walker granted a writ of mandamus, an "extraordinary" rebuke of a lower court judge.

But Walker went out of the way to praise Boasberg, saying he was in a tough spot even as Walker overruled him. The district court needed to make a quick decision. The facts on the ground were changing, jurisdiction was unclear, and the merits depended on the meaning of a statute from the 1700s that hadn’t been invoked in the past 75 years.6 I do not envy the position of any judge facing such time pressure to make hard and high-stakes legal decisions. Fortunately, the trial judge assigned to this case had more than two decades of judicial experience, with a widely respected record of dispassionate decisionmaking.
The nuance here will be important to note in light of the Trump DOJ's campaign to vilify Boasberg, whose D.C. Circuit peers largely stood up for him even when his rulings didn't hold.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10
A hearing over Anthropic's lawsuit against the Pentagon is underway: The AI giant's lawyer Michael Mongan asks for a hearing as early as Friday.

“There really are irreparable injuries that are concrete and are mounting every day.”

Judge Lin appears skeptical about moving too quickly.
Trump's government has been "affirmatively reaching out to [Anthropic's] customers" and urging them not to work with the company, per Mongan.
DOJ Attorney James Harlow pushes for a March 18
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(