Let's review the Chemerinsky incident:
Student shows up to celebratory graduation dinner at the dean's house with a speaker system, begins political tirade. Dean and wife plead with her to stop, then ask her to leave multiple times, as they have every right to do. She refuses. She is now a trespasser. Wife, instead of calling police, tries to stop disruption by the much more peaceable means of taking trespasser's microphone away.
Pro-Hamas progressives: Dean's wife is a violent racist.
Student shows up to celebratory graduation dinner at the dean's house with a speaker system, begins political tirade. Dean and wife plead with her to stop, then ask her to leave multiple times, as they have every right to do. She refuses. She is now a trespasser. Wife, instead of calling police, tries to stop disruption by the much more peaceable means of taking trespasser's microphone away.
Pro-Hamas progressives: Dean's wife is a violent racist.
The pro-Hamas progressive subtext, of course, is that the dean is a "Zionist," ie Jew who doesn't think that Israel should be destroyed and therefore he and his family deserve to be given no quarter, and also have none of the normal rights people have, like stopping trespassers from disrupting events, when confronted about their "Zionism" by a Muslim student.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
