NEW: Despite some ponderous moments, we have our first 6 jurors—and it’s only Tuesday afternoon. But we’ll need 18 total (12 jurors and 6 alternates). 1/
For now, Judge Merchan intends to bring back the original six on Monday, meaning he anticipates we could have all 18 by then.
In the meantime, it’s worth noting that Todd Blanche succeeded with challenges to two jurors for cause, both based on social media posts his team discovered. (Remember: The defense has the names of prospective jurors, a right conferred on them by law, but the public does not.) 3/
One of the prospective jurors they succcessfully challenged made a Facebook post about some of the conduct at issue in this case, as it was unfolding, and wrote, “Get him out and lock him up.” 4/
The other, who insisted his personal views were irrelevant and that he could “compartmentalize,” was struck for cause after the defense revealed he posted an AI-created video that mocks Trump’s smarts and touted Trump’s indictment in the Mar a Lago documents case, to which he added, “No one is above the law.” 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: Judge Merchan is now giving introductory remarks to a panel of 96 prospective jurors as Trump rests his eyes. But we’ve already seen some fireworks this morning. 1/
One juror asked to be & was excused based on the details already revealed about her, which she said led family and friends to breathlessly ask whether she was indeed a juror on the case. 2/
A second juror has been discovered to have been arrested for tearing down political posters in the 1990s, after which he became involved in a corruption investigation that led to his entering into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Manhattan DA’s office. 3/
NEW: Day 2 of the Manhattan DA’s criminal trial against Donald Trump ended with seven jurors—and only 4 peremptory challenges left for each of the prosecution and defense. 1/
Why does that matter? Because, judging by today, the defense will have to clear a high bar to prove a juror’s social media posts shows anti-Trump bias & justifies striking them for cause. 2/
And as a result, Trump could end up stuck with the kind of jurors his team doesn’t want: highly educated liberals.
Good morning, all. I’m back in the courthouse this morning to watch day 2 of the Manhattan DA’s case against former President Trump, which starts at 9:30 am. Up first? A hearing on the scope of the DA’s cross examination of Trump if he decides to testify. 1/
That proceeding — known as a Sandoval hearing because of the 1974 New York case for which it’s named — is designed to ensure that a defendant who elects to testify does so in an informed way, knowing what areas are likely to be explored when he is cross-examined. 2/
What is especially interesting about this Sandoval hearing is the defense’s contention, in a March 19 letter, that the DA intends to ask Trump about “thirteen different court determinations, as well as about most of the underlying facts leading to those determinations.” 3/
UPDATE: Knight Specialty Insurance Co. has now filed a host of documents to persuade Judge Arthur Engoron of the sufficiency of its $175 million bond in the New York Attorney General’s civil fraud case. 1/
And those docs not only say Trump’s collateral is a Schwab securities account held by the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust with $175.3 million in value as of April 5, 2014, even though the filing was made today. 2/
Knight Specialty Insurance Co. also signed an agreement with Trump’s trust and Schwab that allows Knight to control the account within two business days of Schwab’s receiving notice that Knight intends to exert that control. 3/
NEW: We’re done with day 1 of Trump’s first criminal trial, and while we’ve got a ways to go, the prospective jurors include a “bookseller,” an oncology nurse, an assistant Bronx County DA, and a woman from Fanduel, the sports betting site.
But after the potential jurors are gone, the fireworks start after Blanche asks Merchan to allow Trump to attend the SCOTUS argument on presidential immunity next Thursday, 4/25. This is the first time they have made that request, I believe.
The Manhattan DA’s office opposes the request, saying they have accommodated Trump’s schedule enough. Merchan acknowledges a Supreme Court argument is a “big deal,” but says that the jury’s time is a big deal too.
Some have asked me whether Hope Hicks will testify truthfully if called as a witness in the Manhattan DA's criminal trial. Hicks is no stranger to talking to government investigators--and her history suggests she'll be forthcoming. 1/
Consider this snippet from a 12/17 FBI interview. Yes, it's heavily redacted--but indicates "the only other time" Hicks had seen Trump as angry as he was when Mueller was appointed was "when the Access Hollywood tape came out during the campaign." 2/
In June 2019, when Hicks was before the House Judiciary Committee, she was also asked about her knowledge of and involvement in the settlements with Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. She testified that she was never present "when Trump and Cohen discussed Stormy Daniels." 3/