(1/X) Sorry to keep doing these, but I wanted to do one more thing about how poorly media handles the asymmetry between Trump and Democrats. This is torn directly from my real life experiences watching deans empower an abusive narcissistic sociopath...
(2/X) A way to bothsides without technically bothsiding is just to say things like "no wonder Americans are losing faith in politics". It blames no one explicitly, which means that it blames everyone implicitly...
(3/X) You can say things like "a nation divided" or "a symptom of cultural decline", but it means always means the same things: all actors are equally at fault...
(4/X) This probably sounds like a conservative sentiment (though it's something I mostly hear other liberals say these days): people to have to be held to account for that actions. If someone can do shitty stuff and know all they'll get is "a nation divided"...
(5/X) Of course they'll do keep doing that shitty stuff and likely escalate to shittier stuff. To me, it's an example of a kind of thinking which has some kind of origin on the left and has become a weapon of the right...
(6/X) The vague idea that there are two sides to every story and that no one is really bad is something conservatives have often presented (as a caricature to some extent) of more liberal thinking...
(7/X) But how quickly it morphs into "good people on both sides" and "on vaccines, views differ". Another lesson of the current times is that a sufficiently amoral and sociopathic person or persons...
(8/X) Can take sentiment, idea, principle, etc. at hand and it use it for their purposes. It goes again to why there is no easy way to control a narcissistic sociopath with structures, since narcissistic sociopaths are so flexible in their methods...
(9/X) You need tough people with backbone to stand up to them. And that is lacking in our media and federal GOP officials. It is perhaps even more lacking in university administration, at least in my experience.
(10/X) I should also add that universities (and probably other non-profits) are places where you see quite a lot of ostensibly liberal-sounding jargon used for abusive and exploitative means...
(11/X) "We are all good people here" so abusers never have to be reined in. "It's all for the greater good" so ono one has to be paid adequately. And so on and so on.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wanted to do another quick thing about how media has managed to continue doing it even as the Republican Party has become a cult of personality led by a narcissistic sociopath. Again, my observations are based on my university’s empowering of a narcissistic sociopath…(1/X)
(2/X) First, as I’ve noted before, it is always possible to bothsides anything because no person or party is perfect and you can always find some bad thing Democrats are doing that somehow equates with what Republicans are doing. But Trump does make that more challenging…
(3/X) Hardcore propagandists like Jonathan Turley will say that Trump’s insurrection was no different from Democrats asking for a recount in Florida in 2000 but for most journalists, that is a bridge too far (to their credit)….
(1/X) Sometimes I hear people wondering if it would be easier to stop Trump if we had the right kind of structures. I deal with someone like Trump (narcissistic sociopath) and the answer is "no"....
(2/X) There are already many things in place to stop him. The Senate could have DQ'ed him. Republicans could stop him now if they wanted to. Instead, even "brave" Rs like Romney refuse to endorse Biden...
(3/X) Why? I don't think it's for money or anything like that (they can't take away Mitt's car elevator), they're just weak people and it's in their code never to endorse a Democrat.
(1/X) Gonna give you my one Mitch hot take. He really f**ed up not DQing Trump in the Senate after 1/6. The country would be better off if he had, his party would be better off.....
(2/X) His initial reaction was the he wanted to. So why didn't he? Too much pushback from his party, fear of the far right, and then you can always find a reason not to do something...
(3/X) Maybe it's "you can't impeach him after he leaves office". Maybe it's "better to beat him at the ballot box." There's always a reason you can find to justify what you want to do...
(1) I see a lot of people saying "political reporters are rooting for Trump." I don't think that's true, but what's going on isn't that different. Here's what I think is going on (based on some people I know in that general area)...
(2) First of all, there is a lot of pressure not to have teh liberal bias. So you've got to be at least a little tougher on Ds than Rs. Then there's the "I was just doing my job stuff"...(2/X)
(3) "My job" for some reason includes doing a lot of vibes-based pieces, which by their very nature favor Republicans. I honestly don't know why doing vibes-based pieces is part of their job, but it's what they believe...
Quick programming note... want to cross-post to Bluesky and Threads. Is there an easy way to automate this? I don't think this account can leave here, because I've been told it does shame some of the practitioners of bad political reporting. I buy that because...(1/X)
(2/X) If liberals complain to political reporters in an earnest fashion, they just smirk and say "you mad, bro?" (See Jeff Sharlet's recent piece that ends with him talking to a Times reporter, for example.)
(3/X) But ppl don't like being laughed at, especially Times-type people who like to think of themselves as cool. They especially don't like to be laughed at in a way they can barely understand, which is what we do here.