Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Julie Hamill Profile picture
@hamill_law
Apr 19 • 10 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
I'm reading through the unofficial final Title IX rule right now, and my first takeaway is that it appears to have been written entirely by TRAs. My second takeaway is that if this stands, we have permanently ended women's sports.
Third takeaway: There are First Amendment problems with this regulation that the agency repeatedly dismisses without addressing. This will be a problem for the Biden admin in litigation.
Also, these are arguments that will come up in litigation. (from p. 1214) Image
"The Department’s interpretation of Title IX to cover sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination readjusts the balance between State and Federal authority, implicating the Tenth Amendment, sets up potential conflicts with State laws, weakens local control of education, and undermines the Department’s compliance with the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. 3403(b)."Image
Here is the DOE's response to the argument that coverage of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination is at odds with the purpose of Title IX: Image
If you want to read for yourself: Ctrl + F "Gender" www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
What I can't wrap my head around is that the entire 1577-page document requires a person to suspend truth and biological reality and believe in a very specific abstract ideology.
One of the problems that led to this absurd result is the civic illiteracy of Americans. 9 out of 10 people have no idea this is going on. They had no idea there was a public comment period, or how to participate. They won't find out this happened until their daughter loses to a male in some athletic contest.
@SteveMillerOC To expand, if we are forced under the law to accept the notion that a man who wishes to identify as a woman is a woman, then we cannot exclude that woman from female sports.
If you haven't read the text of Title IX, you should. Essentially, today's rule attempts to undermine the entire statute and its purpose. Biden and Cardona have literally no idea what they are talking about. They will be sued, and they will lose. justice.gov/crt/title-ix-e…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Julie Hamill

Julie Hamill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hamill_law

Julie Hamill Profile picture
Dec 16
PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE 🧵

Last week, Assemblyman Bill Essayli asked the Legislature to investigate allegations by the U.S. Department of Justice against a sitting member who has been accused of soliciting and accepting bribes. 1/x
The plea agreement refers to the member as "Person 20," an elected official who, starting in 2017 and ending in November 2018, was running for State elected office. 2/x
The DOJ alleges Person 20 approached defendant, former Baldwin Park city attorney Robert Tafoya, and asked him to solicit a bribe payment from a company seeking a marijuana permit in the City using the same intermediary scheme utilized by councilman Ricardo Pacheco. 3/x Image
Read 20 tweets
Julie Hamill Profile picture
Nov 22
A thread on the absolute insanity that is the City of Los Angeles Sanctuary policy, and a rebuttal to the local news outlets and activists who are incorrectly telling the public that violent criminals are exempt. 🧵 1/15
The fact that we’re even discussing this at all is maddening. Intentionally subverting efforts to control the border and federal immigration laws should be met with severe penalties. 2/15
I noted in a post “the City of Los Angeles and LAPD Chief declare that they will not cooperate with ICE to deport violent criminals,” lamenting the insanity of passing this ordinance the same week Laken Riley's Venezuelan gang member murderer was convicted on all counts. 3/15
Read 16 tweets
Julie Hamill Profile picture
Jul 14
I am a mom. My kids were harmed by government policy and my elected officials didn't care, so I ran for school board. Despite having always been politically independent, I was characterized as a "far right extremist" (also racist, white supremacist, MAGA) because I didn't want my kids forced to get shots or wear a mask and I wanted them to be back in school. When I ran, the local Democrat party repeatedly spread false information about me. 1/9
After I won, the rhetoric exploded. Women I considered close friends turned on me because they believed horrific lies that were spread about me. The local Democrat party, the teacher's union leader, and PFLAG joined forces to smear me as a bigot, in complete contravention of facts and reality. I expressed my concerns to these people about the hatred they were fomenting against me and the consequences for my children. They did not care. They ignored me and doubled down. For the first time in my life, I felt like I was looking evil in the face. I've felt it several times since. 2/9
When I sued the County for violating our constitutional rights, the County came after me and my children through its well-compensated lawyers. They put photos of my children into the court record. Lawyers for the government and Twitter worked together to seal documents showing censorship efforts by members of congress. The government and its attorneys characterized me and my clients as politically motivated extremists--Republicans who hated masks. (FTR only one of the founding members was a registered Republican, the rest were Dems and independents). 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Julie Hamill Profile picture
Jun 26
Brain dump on the Murthy v. Missouri decision, which I correctly predicted to be a disaster for free speech in America in my chat with @PhilHollowayEsq... Here are my initial thoughts, in what I call "statists versus the people". 🧵
The decision's framing of the moderation policies and censorship efforts in incorrect. When SCOTUS approves of the government using a secret backchannel to nuke accounts and posts that criticize the government or a politician, America is lost.
SCOTUS says neither the states nor individual plaintiffs have standing to seek an injunction against any defendant. They incorrectly explain that plaintiff’s theories of standing depend on the platforms actions, but plaintiffs did not seek to enjoin platforms from restricting any posts or accounts
This is not true. The theory of standing depends on the government’s actions--the pressure to censor—and plaintiffs seek to stop government from pressuring social media companies.
Read 20 tweets
Julie Hamill Profile picture
Jun 14
A district court judge in Louisiana (the same judge who issued the lower court decision in what is now Murthy v. Missouri) enjoined the new Title 9 rules in the States of Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, and Idaho. Short🧵on the decision: 1/8
There are some great lines. I'll start with my favorites:
“The abuse of power by administrative agencies is a threat to democracy.” 2/8
“Title IX was enacted for the protection of the discrimination of biological females. However, the Final Rule may likely cause biological females more discrimination than they had before Title IX was enacted.” 3/8
Read 9 tweets
Julie Hamill Profile picture
Jun 7
Wow. The 9th Circuit decision in Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Carvalho is a thing of beauty... Thread:
Much like LADPH and other authoritarian government agencies, LAUSD had a pattern of withdrawing and then reinstating its vaccination policies.
According to the Court, this pattern was enough to keep the case alive.
"The record supported a strong inference that LAUSD waited to see how the oral argument in this court proceeded before determining whether to maintain the Policy or to go forward with a pre-prepared repeal option.
LAUSD expressly reserved the option to again consider imposing a vaccine mandate. Accordingly, LAUSD has not carried its heavy burden to show that there is no reasonable possibility that it will again revert to imposing a similar policy." The mootness argument was rejected.
Then, we get to the real juice.
"[T]he district court misapplied the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in concluding that the Policy survived rational basis review.
Jacobson held that mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to preventing the spread of smallpox.
Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a “traditional” vaccine.
Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply."
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(