If you want to understand what will be done to DeFi, you must first understand what was done to Forex and offshore american bank accounts, as well as the indictment of Bitmex, Binance, Bybit, and Kucoin, and the implications of the indictment of Sterlingov -- background:
The Obama administration made significant strides in enforcing financial regulations globally, particularly in implementing Know Your Customer (KYC) rules and combating tax evasion through the use of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
regulations and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Here's how these initiatives unfolded: Implementation of KYC Rules through OECD and FATCA
OECD's Role: The OECD has been pivotal in setting international standards aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorist
During the Obama administration, the OECD worked to enhance the transparency of financial transactions globally. Although the OECD does not have direct regulatory authority like a national government, its guidelines and frameworks influence national policies,
particularly in areas like tax information exchange and financial due diligence.
FATCA Regulations: Enacted in 2010, FATCA specifically targeted tax non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts. FATCA required foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report to the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U.S. taxpayers held a substantial ownership interest. This was a crucial move to implement KYC rules globally.
Global Reach: To enforce FATCA, the U.S. Treasury negotiated a series of Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with other countries, which either allowed the FFIs to report the required information to their own governments,
which then relayed it to the IRS, or permitted direct reporting to the IRS. These agreements effectively made FATCA a global tool for enforcing KYC because compliance was necessary for institutions to avoid withholding taxes and remain competitive in global markets.
CFTC Enforcement in Non-American Countries
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is an independent U.S. federal agency tasked with regulating the U.S. derivatives markets, including futures, options, and swaps. Between 2009 and 2020,
the CFTC's role expanded significantly in enforcing regulations on unlicensed offerings, even in non-American jurisdictions:
Dodd-Frank Act: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 expanded the CFTC’s jurisdiction to include swaps,
which significantly increased the scope of its regulatory authority. The Act imposed new registration, reporting, and disclosure requirements on operators globally, particularly if they dealt with U.S. persons or operated in U.S. markets.
Global Enforcement: The CFTC enforced rules against unlicensed offerings globally by leveraging international cooperation agreements and its authority to pursue bad actors that threaten U.S. markets or investors, even if those entities were based overseas.
This included actions against illegal offerings and fraud in the derivatives and commodities markets.
By using regulatory frameworks from both the OECD and FATCA, along with the expanded authority under Dodd-Frank, the Obama administration was able to implement and enforce KYC
rules and other financial regulations worldwide, influencing global financial practices and enhancing transparency and compliance across international borders.
---So the truth is, the government has done this before, and the IRS and Treasury see permissionless finance and smart contracts as a Developing Market Forex Broker, something to be enforced with aml-kyc laws, and they fully intend to do this globally in all countries.
FATCA: Requires foreign financial institutions to report accounts held by U.S. taxpayers. Non-compliance can lead to criminal charges if these institutions are found to be knowingly aiding tax evasion.
Money Laundering Laws: The U.S. can charge individuals if their actions
involve U.S. financial systems or have significant effects on U.S. commerce, regardless of where these actions occur.
Sanctions Enforcement:
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) can impose penalties on foreign entities that violate U.S. sanctions, which can lead to extradition and prosecution under U.S. law if bilateral treaties exist.
------Time for the best part, the extensive list of sources I'm bringing to prove that the US government intends to kill DeFi globally a full list of 2.5 years of twitter threads on the regulatory progress.
If people cannot put python code or golan code interacting with smart contracts, into a desktop software wallet, open source downloaded, without being indicted, then yeah the gov is telling what free code publishing is allowed, it sets the precedent for banning math/ai/everything
they're telling you which math, which encryption, which speech, which language of code, how you execute it, that you're allowed to publish, freely as FOSS, and indicting you for hosting it on *a central server somewhere or Github, plus they've forced Github to censor
This is what liberal dem voting OG FOSS people who hate crypto believe, they don't understand that the line between code publishing and markets/money as speech is that blurred, it will be used to censor, it is a violation of the 1st/4rth.
I don't want to say that it is a good thing to do tribalism in crypto zero sum, but I am at the line in the sand where I think principled privacy people/darkfi people are going to have to really profoundly stigmatize the eth community, with the stakes being this high.
It isn't eth itself or the network itself, it's the political culture of centrist liberals. I saw what this type of person did to the Libertarian Party, post Israel Terror attack that is 100% coming to crypto. The fixation of onchain KYC because of moral policing.
There's a hefty list of reasons for why onchain kyc and kyc honeypots on frontends, and insane mandated centralized frontends are absolutely not needed. We have better civil liberty with 0 DeFi and CEX w/ its aml regs for 8 years. DeFi is a net loss of civil liberty.
Remember Jesse Powell made it clear he was forced to do this by Trudeau. That is the clearer point, this isn't about freedom of disassociation *it is the state forcing private companies to force people to disassociate*
The problem with privacy pools is it adds a huge layer of law enforcement abuse, there's no denying that. But it highlights serious serious grave issues with pure code is law. I don't think the criticisms of ameen or Vitalik are grasping the actual problem.
The problem is the West isn't going to allow monero or base layer privacy to scale. If everyone is doxxed to LEO, the more layers of association list you have, the more surface area for LEO. It's very very serious game theoretically. Seeking good faith where there is none.
We need to talk about what DeFi's aims at financial engineering are, and what it is actually perceived as.
DeFi is perceived both by it's developers and by Tradfi and the Fed as a competition with regulated brokers and registered products, as regulatory evasion.
I would strongly counter against this and argue that the real purpose and utility of DeFi is to be a direct competitor with Prime Brokerages and Financial Institutions in and of themselves, to expose them to public transparency, and give access to retail & emerging markets.
The deliberate intent to not only evade licensing and registration, but to extend exotic alpha products, like derivatives, leverage, new tokens, exotic yield, lending, and exotic instruments, directly to anyone, without requiring intermediary, pedigree, licensing, or banks.
the fact that the american anarchist only want to make mini feifdom east germany hellholes on mastadon rather than lenster should tell you virtually everything you need to know about american classical anarchism and how disturbed the anarchist movement in the US is.
I cannot stress how strongly any sort of left libertarianism or american anarchism is fundamentally bad for the crypto industry, even though some of the best developers in the defi space, including myself are technically left-libertarian or anarchist.
It's a very long obscure history of the Libertarian Party spanning back 20 or 30 years, even deeper if you go into the 60s, 70s, 80s, but the actual living people and arguments covers the last 20 years. It does matter, it is grave, it is relevant to crypto and 1st/4rth amendment.
wait, so the entire futures system in the united states is broken because of the 15 cent routing fee that CQG charges. Like that in and of itself breaks the crypto futures industry. Because you need 100 contracts of nano contracts to make 1 bitcoin. @duganist@0xMakesy
If you have a per contract per fee side it breaks the whole thing. That's like bitmex charging you 15 cents per 200 dollar notional exposure. It works out to 270$ or 27 bps per 100k. Brian armstrong needs to do something about this, that's absolutely bonkers.
then again why would he, he already does it to spot traders on coinbase? See this scam? wtf