1- This thread 🧵 shows how an 'anti-disinformation' account can actually contribute to the spread of disinformation.@GeoConfirmed previously reached conclusions without sufficient evidence during the Al Ahli hospital incident. Now, they have done so again without a proper assessment, suggesting a potential bias. Here's an analysis explaining why this particular assessment overlooks other important facts...
2- The analysis omitted crucial information from sat imagery. Following the same timeline, the IDF entered Nassir Hospital on Feb 15. high-resolution image from Feb 14, the day before the attack, shows that the graves Palestinians dug were located beneath trees that were still present on Feb 14
Source of image: Planet.com
Source of image: Planet.com
3- The next image, from February 17, two days after the attack, shows that the trees were still standing but affected slightly, and all the tents of displaced people had been destroyed.
Source: planet.com
Source: planet.com
3- Satellite imagery from Feb 22 clearly shows that the trees were raked, suggesting a high likelihood that the IDF may have disturbed the bodies of the deceased, as they were buried shallowly. Furthermore, the new videos reveals that the outer wall of the hospital near the graveyard was destroyed following the attack which suggest the IDF vehicle ramped over the bodies
4- This suggests that either the IDF placed the bodies in the same spot without respecting the dignity of the dead, or they killed new individuals and piled the bodies together
5 - Jumping to the conclusion that this is not a mass grave caused by the IDF is a seriously biased analysis. @GeoConfirmed's analysis neglected the timeline provided by satellite imagery and arrived at a conclusion that absolves the IDF from this crime without conducting proper and thorough analysis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
