1/ Some thoughts from a Wassie in a suit regarding the state of the market founded purely on anecdotal evidence gleaned from being a founder, advisor and investor that isn't completely out of touch with reality.
The altcoin / venture market feels incredibly uncomfortable.
2/ Obviously none of these is legal or financial advice, especially because this take is probably mid-curve af.
But these views are formed from having a front-row seat to dozens of fundraisings as an advisor and service provider, as well as being a founder and angel.
3/ The headline point is this - who the fuck will buy my venture bags at 10-11 figure valuations when (a) the institutional bid is only on majors, (b) 'dumb money' is purely aping memecoins and (c) the only 'smart retail' that would buy those bags are already in private rounds?
4/ To elaborate further, I think the first point is easy enough to digest. The BTC ETF (and maybe ETH ETF) has unlocked liquidity from a new class of investors. The flows will likely accelerate over time as larger and less nimble funds get internal sign-off to allocate towards...
5/ the ETFs. Unlike our terminally online asses that rebalance our portfolios every 5 minutes, your large institutional funds move a lot more slowly. And I do think it is likely that they will allocate more towards BTC whenever they next get approval to rebalance their exposure.
6/ But BTC (and maybe ETH) flows do not translate to bids on your favorite ZK DA AI/Gaming Intent-centric L1/L2/L3/L4 that you privately aped at 9 fig 'seed' valuation because its definitely going out the gates at 10 fig FDV when it TGEs sometime in 2024 - 2026.
7/ Or the countless cheques for dApps you wrote at 10 - 20m valuation because your brain assured you that this is going out the gate for 80-100m minimum.
If you are reading this and thinking 'Oh wait that's me!' - you are probably a 2022 survivor that was likely 'dumb money'...
8/ in the last cycle buying the VC fund's bags that has spent the bear market working hard, networking and building your own circle of friends with which you share 'alpha'.
This cycle - you are the 'smart money' and you are going to make your 10x on 'dumb retail'.
9/ Wait but where the fuck is the dumb retail?
Now obviously Larry will buy your BTC bags but you have none because you don't want a 3x, you want to a 30x at least. You have altcoins.
And the dumb retail who don't have connections / alpha are...
aping memecoins.
Riiiiight.
10/ Which brings us to point number 2.
If the paragraph above didn't apply to you (i.e. you haven't been writing a boatload of seed / private cheques via your friends / NFT community / local KOL), are you sitting around ready to ape a coin with 3 rounds of VC funding at 9 figs?
11/ Probably not. You may be 'dumb retail' but you aren't that retarded.
We all know that the main utility of any token is to sell it to someone else at a higher price. It doesn't matter if the tech is based on dogs, cats, frogs or the flavor of the month buzzword.
12/ Because lets get real here. who the fuck actually reads the white paper to find out if the tech is truly more decentralised? Or that it really will provide more TPS than Solana? Or is more censorship resistant / efficient / scalable?
The only question is - will there be EL?
13/ "Hey wassielawyer ser - you are being too cynical. Surely there are people who are still investing for the tech!"
Yes of course there are. The problem is - they are already in the seed rounds.
Which brings us back to the question - who is buying your venture bags?
14/ Ok but how about the 'new' retail that isn't on CT, that isn't networked into the space and isn't buying majors or memecoins?
Firstly, said individuals likely only exist in an asylum.
Secondly, in case all your friends are cartoon characters, normies are poor.
15/ Unlike in 2020 when everyone was receiving stimmies and had literally nothing better to do but participate in a casino, the average normie is struggling with inflation and higher rental / mortgage while wages stagnate.
No they don't have time to buy your shiny new altcoin.
16/ But surely with the wealth creation brought on by BTC / memecoins, some of that crypto-native money will flow into alts?
Yes I am sure some will. But most won't.
BTC holders are the most risk-averse in this retarded industry.
Memecoin millionaires will buy a lambo.
17/ Inflows certainly aren't enough to absorb the hundreds and thousands of projects that will TGE in Q3 2024 all the way through to end 2025.
The good projects will likely have market makers in to try and anchor a price before the unlock dumps. Bad ones - straight to zero?
18/ Because if you can't figure out who the hell is your exit liquidity (because said exit liquidity is already sitting in the seed / Series A round next to you)...
You probably are the exit liquidity.
You just don't know it yet.
Not until the tokens unlock.
19/ That said - I am sure some altcoins will still outperform.
Those that have already had significant supply distribution and limited overhang (and real tech / use case + marketing) will certainly continue to draw whatever 'smart money' interest there is left.
But not all.
20/ Again - a very hypocritical thread because I have written angel cheques to L1s/L2s/dApps that I genuinely do believe in.
And my business (@gvrn_ai) is literally built on helping founders structure their legal entities / fundraise and manage legal (DM me if you need help!).
21/ And I hold an uncomfortable amount of liquid altcoin bags (albeit with seemingly limited supply overhang) in projects and founders that I believe in.
So I do hope I am wrong and someone buys my bags.
Not legal or financial advice.
I'm a Wassie in a suit.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A decision relating to @DeFianceCapital's lawsuit against 3AC in Singapore has just been made public and contains some interesting points around the treatment of cryptoassets and trust relationships.
For context, I have been working with @Arthur_0x on this for the past year.
2/ I don't normally post about court decisions or comment publicly on the litigation of clients I work with but given the fact that this fairly significant judgment has been made public (and circulating in the legal space), I thought I'd break from the usual rule.
3/ To understand the points that arise from this judgment (linked at the end), one must first appreciate the relationship between 3AC and DeFiance Capital (DC).
DC was founded by @Arthur_0x and in fact pre-dates 3AC. It took a form similar to that of most prop funds set up...
1/ Longer thread on the 'private placement' mode of fundraising, why it is a net negative for the space and why in an ideal world we should make ICOs great again.
The problem isn't the identity of the participants in these private placements.
2/ Disclaimer: this thread spawns from pure ideology.
I advise VCs, syndicates and projects that conduct investments via private placements and syndication.
I co-founded a legaltech company that builds tech to facilitate this, funded by VCs and angels in a private placement.
3/ I even write angel cheques.
So it not only reeks of hypocrisy but is also commercially inadvisable for me to be publicly ranting about the metaphorical whore of Babylon as I suckle from its teat.
But perhaps one can live in a broken world and dream of a better one.
1/ Getting into legal disputes in crypto is incredibly annoying and are among my least favourite engagements.
So here’s a guide to avoiding and navigating disputes so you don’t have to threaten to sue people (which is cringe) or pay lawyers to do so (which is expensive).
2/ Firstly, put in the effort (within reason) to define and document the scope of your agreement.
Yes it’s awkward talking about money, haggling over profit share and contemplating a breakdown in relationship at the start of an endeavour.
But being aligned early on will…
3/ help you avoid most conflicts later down the line.
Be clear what the deal is - so that nobody feels rugged when things go awry.
I’ve seen situations when one person thinks the other is doing things “for fun” while the other thinks he’s a cofounder/advisor.
1/ Just finished reading the draft plan of reorganization filed by FTX (i.e. JR3 and team).
Headline points:
- US and Intl recover from separate pools
- Maybe restart FTX Intl
- Crypto claims going to be assessed in USD at Ch 11 date
- Mostly waffling
Quite disappointing.
2/ I realised recently that years as a lawyer have made me an unintentional expert at hedging all my communications.
This draft plan is a masterclass in how to speak like a lawyer (i.e. say a lot while saying very little with conviction and leaving lots of room to backtrack).
3/ So here is a quick run-down of the bits which aren't fluff.
Firstly, 3 pools of recovery - FTX US, FTX Intl and General Pool.
So assets of FTX US will go to FTX US customers pro rata and assets of FTX Intl will go to FTX Intl customers pro rata.
It is not one I particularly enjoy writing because I do not like FUDing anyone's bags or discouraging innovation. In fact, when the OPNX deck first surfaced, I thought the idea was a potentially good one.
But I think this PSA is necessary.
2/ There are many potential issues with the OPNX business model. @Travis_Kling has summed a lot of them up in this thread.
But for me - the most fundamental problem with this business model is that OPNX is buying your claims with their native token.
3/ To put it quite plainly, you are trading your FTX claim (for example) which has a real dollar value - and which will entitle you to a payout of let's say, for illustrative purposes only, 50c on the dollar in 5 years - for a bunch of OX tokens printed by OPNX.
1/ One of the most common questions I receive from startup founders is 'Where do I incorporate my company'?
This is a question without an easy answer - and lawyers / service providers all shilling you their own jurisdictions doesn't help.
Hopefully this thread does.
2/ The first question you need to consider is - what is the purpose of the company you are incorporating? This will affect which jurisdictions are suitable - what might work for a development company (Devco) may not work for a token issuer or a DAO wrapper or DAO SPV.
3/ Why does this matter? Because the purpose of the company will affect what functionality you want out of incorporating in that jurisdiction.
Let's say you are a founder building the next cutting edge casino (sorry I mean perps exchange) and need to incorporate a Devco.