Eli Tyre Profile picture
Apr 23 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Does anyone know what the argument is for the retention breath segment of Wim Hof breathing is?

It seems to me, based on the proposed mechanism, you should get all the benefits (and more so?) from straight up hyperventilating, without any breath hold at all.
Does anyone know the claimed reason why holding your breath helps?
The argument that I've heard is that this causes a build up of CO2, which increases Oxygen Absorption by the cells.

And that's not...totally unreasonable. Higher acidity DOES cause hemoglobin molecules to release more oxygen on average.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_effe…
But...that doesn't matter if there's not oxygen in the blood to be unloaded.

And I can straight up see, on a pulse oximeter, that my blood oxygen drops (by like 40%) during the breath hold, as one might expect.
At best, there's a short period where my tissues are getting ~10% more oxygen than normal, followed immediately by a ~50% oxygen deprivation?
Am I missing the point here? Or is half of the Wim Hof breathing protocol superfluous, on its own proposed mechanisms?
@threadreaderapp @Twtextapp @unrollthread unroll @threader_app compile

========================================

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

Apr 12
Has their ever been a human culture that trained it's citizens in virtue, sufficiently, such that transparent flattery doesn't work on them?

This thought prompted by the ads in the airport, many of which have barely relevant flattering slogans.
dath ilani would shocked at that. The slogans are trying to hack your decision process and they're not even logically valid!

But has any real human culture done better?
There are also dogs in this airport. That's pretty great.

Fewer dumb ads, more dogs.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 21
I'm monogamous by nature. I've never wanted to be in a romantic relationship with more than one person.

But I've exclusively dated poly people, since the people I wanted to date were poly. And ~all my friends are poly.

So I've been pretty close to some poly relationships.
I'm exploring strategic "mainstream" dating right now. Seeing about meeting people on bumble, and so on.

I've been surprised by how strong the negative reaction to poly is.
Not just "that's not what I want, personally", which makes total sense.

But there's a derision ("grow up already") or something like triggered-disgust?
Read 17 tweets
Mar 20
I just read @nabeelqu's post on how to use twitter.

I don't get it. This is not my experience with Twitter at all.

nabeelqu.co/twitter
I basically already follow his advice, with regards to tweeting.
When I'm reading books and blogposts, I take notes for myself: recording thoughts, questions, ideas, etc. And, since it's cheap, I'll paste some fraction of those thought threads into typefully, edit a bit, and post to twitter.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 19
So....it was probably bad that Trump lost in 2020?

Because if he had won, he wouldn't be running again, and neither would Biden (probably).

And it seems likely that the intelligence explosion is going happen in the next presidential term.
If Trump had won, we would at least be seeing different candidates this time around.

And that's not a guarantee that they would be better, than these two, but we at least get a different draw.
That's too bad.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 18
It's dawning on me how much the incentives of software, and the world, are warped by VC.

The possibility of unicorn returns distorts the whole industry, most of which would probably have more wholesome impacts on the world if they focused on making more revenue than costs.
The whole world is using software, but most (?) of the producers of the software are beholden to something other than their customers: they need to grow, so that they're attractive to the next round of investors, so that they can grow more, so that the founders can exit.
The customers are the fuel for that process, but that doesn't mean that you're giving them the best experience you can. If you can grow faster or get better returns for your investors by doing something else, you do that.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 13
Rereading Eliezer's post on wasted motions.

"[Fix] in your mind the scenario where your goal has been achieved, and ask whether a thought will predictably not have contributed to getting there in retrospect."

facebook.com/yudkowsky/post…
This feels like a new insight: this is a two step process. You don't just try and notice wasted motions. You first visualize the world where you succeed, and then, looking back from there, ask if the motions that you're doing are actually helpful.
When I imagine doing that for my romantic goal for instance, looking back from the world where I succeeded in making it happen, I feel embarrassed about all the fretting I did about it. What a waste!
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(