Hi all. Nerdy policy wonk who follows Congress closely weighing in with a thread on legislation (getting no media coverage) moving rapidly through Congress that targets US non-profit orgs, with the immediate & explicit target being orgs involved in Palestine protesting.
1/
I'm talking here about a bipartisan legislation the House passed last week (382-11) & that was intro'd last week in the Senate -- HR 6408 & S. 1436.
This will gives a single US official authority to strip US non-profits orgs of their non-profit status in a peremptory manner, w/ virtually no limitations, accountability, or meaningful recourse, based merely on his declaration they are “terrorist supporting organizations”
3/
The explicit target of this legislation is orgs involved in/supporting protest against Israel’s war on Gaza, most notably SJP. But of course, if passed into law, it could be used against any tax-exempt org working for an objective disfavored by the Admin in power.
4/
The intent behind the bill — the targeting of groups engaged in protest for Palestinian rights/lives — has been made explicit - e.g., here's the Chair of the House Ways & Means Committee when it was marking up/passing the bill last November:
Reminder: US charitable organizations — like ALL US entities — are already barred, by law, from providing material support for terror & already face intense scrutiny.
6/
The goal of the new legislation is to dispense with the due process (incl the need for evidence) afforded under law to targeted groups, empowering a single US official to act as prosecutor, judge, jury, & executioner of US orgs whose viewpoints that official disagrees with.
7/
Those whose prioritize shutting down pro-Palestine protest above all else may view this legislation as excellent news.
Those concerned with Palestinian rights/lives, and those who view with concern the rapid erosion of free speech/protest rights in the US, may disagree.
8/
Either way, it is remarkable that this legislation--which has profound implications for protest/free speech in the US-- is so far going pretty much unnoticed.
9/
For more, see post from @CharitySecurity -
Also note: I’m tracking this legislation closely (since it was intro’d in Nov) in my weekly Round-Up. For the latest coverage see:
@CharitySecurity Also see: This Bill Would Give the Treasury Nearly Unlimited Power To Destroy Nonprofits —It supposedly bans financing terrorism, but that's already illegal. It's really a power grab for the secretary of the treasury. @matthew_petti
@CharitySecurity @matthew_petti Upping the ante: letter from House Ways&Means suggests IRS should revoke tax-exempt status of orgs that "promote conduct that is counter to public policy" -- focusing on alleged antisemitism & China influence, so who could object, right?
@CharitySecurity @matthew_petti Note: House Ways & Means letter also suggests IRS must vet c3's for "antisemitism" & asks about the definition of "antisemtism" the IRS is using [stay tuned for effort to legislate the IHRA definition of antisemitism into IRS regulations!]
@CharitySecurity @matthew_petti Also see: Lawmakers Ask IRS To Probe Chinese Funding to Anti-Israel Protests [so first they call the protests "terrorism," now they call them "China-funded" -- see how delegitimization of free speech & demonizing of protesters works?]
I’m getting lots of journalists asking me about this story and this quote:
“The Biden administration made clear to the Palestinians that current U.S. law compels the administration to veto such a resolution or defund the UN, a U.S. official said."
Rosen (D-NV) et al have intro'd new far-reaching legislation on antisemitism...at the center of which is of course the IHRA definition & the conflation of antisemitism w/ criticism of Israel &/or Zionism. A quick breakdown of IHRA-related elements in this bipartisan bill.
1/
(A) It includes an overarching Sense of Congress that the IHRA definition "should be utilized by Federal, State, and 20 local agencies" -- in direct contradiction to Biden Admin's non-centering/endorsing of the IHRA definition of antisemitism as part of its antisemitism strategy
(B) It includes an overarching statement defining antisemitism according to the definition included "in section 3 of the 25 Never Again Education Act (36 U.S.C. 2301 note)" -- which is, in fact, the IHRA definition w/o attribution to IHRA or listing its examples.
Full article: Antisemitism and Zionism: The Internal Operations of the IHRA Definition - indispensable, timely research/analysis from Neve Gordon tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
“The analysis reveals that the IHRA definition of antisemitism serves as a counterinsurgency tool aimed at shielding Israel from resistance to its oppressive form of racial governance and, following its recent war on Gaza, from accusations of genocidal violence.”
The ban on US $$ to UNRWA until March 25 is a NOT what the Israeli FM glibly pretends it is. However you feel about UNRWA, facts matter. Here are key facts about the aid ban to UNRWA (beyond the overarching fact that it is unconscionable & a moral obscenity): 1/
The latest round of manufactured outrage & hate being directed at @FranceskAlbs is just beyond the pale. Those of us who know & have worked with her cannot be silent.
1/
As a foreign policy professional - and yes, as Jew - who knows @FranceskAlbs & has had the honor to work with her: I have nothing but respect & appreciation for her expertise, integrity, and humanity.
2/
@FranceskAlbs I’m appalled & disgusted that, yet again, @FranceskAlbs is being subjected to wholly unjust attacks from people who pretend to care for the safety of Jewish people but in truth care only about rationalizing & defending the horrors Israel is inflicting on Palestinians.
3/
The Senate today passed a huge emergency supplemental aid bill. Here's a quick 🧵 reminding folks what's in it for Israel (& what's NOT in it for Palestinians:
1/
DOD funding/programs: The bill provides $10.6 billion in Department of Defense funding for Israel, of which $801.400 million is for ammunition; $5.2 billion is for Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Iron Beam; and the balance is included in various Israel/Ukraine joint line items
2/
SFOPS funding/programs: The bill provides $3.5 billion in Foreign Military Financing (cash) for Israel to buy weapons/military supplies, of which Israel can spend $769.3 million in Israel, & has further authorization to spend the rest in Israel, “if agreed"...
3/