One thing that really bothers me is how, for a lot of people, from carnival barkers like MTG to preening dilettantes like JD Vance, right on down to dollar store “revolutionary socialists” and random anime pfp misanthrope, Ukraine has become nothing but a trope. /1
It’s something that these people, who don’t care about it in the least, much less know about or understand, trot it out at literally every opportunity to use as a foil to complain about something else. /2
It’s worse when they cosplay as being the only ones who really care about Ukrainian lives. “Stop the killing.”
But mostly (increasingly?) they don’t even bother with that. Ukrainians are treated as non-people, bare life that can be killed, mutilated, and raped without guilt. /3
“Tax dollars. Corruption. NATO. American empire. Bandera. Domming the bomb ass. Capitalism. Axist of resistance. Video of people at a bar. Water sprayers on the street during summer (remember that one?).
Whatever. Doesn’t matter. End the war. Commence occupation.”
/4
“It’s for the greater good.
And anyways can you imagine if Russia did [this thing that Russia has documentably done dozens of times]?
Anyways, I don’t want to die in a nuclear war. So a little genocide is a small price to pay, innit? Also 🇺🇦 flag in bio opinion ignored” /5
Not one of these people cares one bit about human life. Not one cares about morals or principles.
So they invent reasons to abandon 44 million to a necropolitical hell while patting themselves on the back for being the only ones brave enough to stand against the war machine. /6
They’re dirt.
Bury them.
Purge them from your organizations.
Kick them out of your weekend get together, preferably with [redacted].
Make them feel unwelcome.
Because they’re ghouls and sociopaths. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve been taking a a Twitter break, partly due to illness, partly to exhaustion, and partly due to other factors.
However, Russia’s escalation-attempting to render Ukraine uninhabitable by destroying electricity infrastructure-has me worried /1
particularly since its allies have largely abandoned it to its fate (I hastened to edit my post to not say “us” because, though I live here, I don’t want to portray myself as an authentically Ukrainian voice). /2
Without air defense (and I include f16s in this) it’s probably only a matter of time before the whole country is plunged into blackout conditions. Kharkiv is already there and is being subjected to almost hourly attacks. /3
Chomsky and others have been mouthing these sorts of proposals for a long time but have been unable (or unwilling) to answer their critics, who point out that accepting them would consign millions to genocide, torture, and rape.
This has become even clearer since 2022. /2
Russia’s greater war aims, of which there is ample documentation in official statements, propaganda, and, of course, Russia’s own actions on the ground, make clear that genocide, colonialism, and forced assimilation are what it aims to achieve.
I think one of the strangest things about anti-Ukrainian posters on both the left and the right is how disinterested and nakedly performative it all is. None of them really even seem to believe what they're saying. Some are being paid; others are likely bots. But the rest are /1
just posting about things they don't actually care about and don't really know much about: it's like they're just saying the words they imagine they're supposed to say, their whole script supplied by memes and posts.
The whole thing is empty theatre, and I find it bizarre. /2
It wouldn't be so bad, I guess, if they weren't weighing in on literal matters of life and death. And I get that dorks like geroman revel in the death and the misery and they have their marching orders.
But some random hamsick kid from Illinois or whatever? How sad it is that /3
A little Ukrainian vignette: I had to move apartments today. The new place let me check in a bit early and the cleaning lady was still there. We chatted a bit. She asked if I was Polish for some reason? I told her, in broken Ukrainian: no, American. /1
I said my Russian was better than my Ukrainian but I was doing everything I could to speak Ukrainian, for obvious reasons. She smiled and said “yes, I’m Ukrainian, but the Soviets forced us to speak Russian and now I only think in Russian. It’s hard.” /2
“And they treated the Ukrainian language like the language of idiots and farmers” and she made a spitting noise to emphasize how Ukrainian language was treated in the USSR. Then she laughed about the drone strike in Moscow yesterday. /3
FWIW when I was at UOregon the CREEES curriculum was almost 100% russocentric. Many amazing professors, but we got fed "Great Russian Culture" from day one. Maybe it's changed since then. Kansas was different - relatively strong Ukrainian curriculum, Tajik & Uyghur language, etc.
That said, I feel like even at KU the russocentrism was still pretty prevalent and, as someone who was focusing on Central Asia at the time, I usually felt pretty marginalized and peripheral. Since I got my PhD the academic job market has only reinforced that perception.
Central Asia is both peripheral to "Post-Soviet" area studies and to "Asian studies," the former of which focuses almost exclusively on Russia and the latter on China.
The reason it never engages with that counterfactual is because it’s not an argument being made in good faith. It’s a cheap and easy, ready made argument emanating from Russian propaganda narratives that have no interest in engaging in counterfactuals.
It’s a substitute for real analysis, which is why it’s so readily deployed by “anti-imperialists” and “realists” alike, few of whom have any actual knowledge of the subject. In both cases it’s easily tailored to whatever argument is being advanced.
It is a narrative that allows the speaker to pretend to a certain degree of authority (“this was entirely predictable”) while waving off objections (that Ukrainians have agency, for example, or that it’s simply wrong) as irrelevant.