Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture
Apr 26 13 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Well, the FedSoc justices pretty much disgraced themselves and their fake pet theories in yesterday’s oral argument on presidential immunity.🧵
Remember when they were “minimalists”? Yesterday they embarked on a long policy peregrination so as to make what Gorsuch called a “ruling for the ages.” (He actually said that.) Behind the stunning pomposity, it’s miles from “minimalist.”
Remember when they were “constitutionalists”? The constitution says they’ve got to stick to the “case or controversy” before them, and yet they went on their wild hypothetical wanderings. Some “constitutionalists.”
Remember when they were “originalists”? Follow the text, never mind what outcomes it leads to?
All gone, in a fog of chin-stroking and hand-waving about what various rulings might portend, and what effects they could have. (That may not be a bad way to rule, but it’s sure not “originalism.”)
Remember their recent switch (Dobbs, Bruen) to “history and tradition”? The “history” is that no president but Nixon and Trump committed crimes; none sought immunity.
The “tradition” is that U.S. presidents for centuries got along just fine without get-out-of-jail-free cards; knowing that if they do crime, they do time.
This case was easy. The FedSoccers had an indictment in front of them. They had zero precedent of absolute presidential immunity.
The question before them was, could the government proceed to trial under that indictment? Instead they embarked on a graduate policy seminar “for the ages.” Oy.
Other than flagrant violations of their own alleged principles, what did this grotesque exercise produce? DELAY. It produced DELAY.
In Bush v. Gore, the FedSoc justices decided the case that put Bush in the presidency one day after oral arguments. When the Republican Party needed speed, FedSoc justices delivered.
And if, as some predict, the Court sends it back for fact-finding, note the variance from the Court’s recent penchant for fact-finding even false facts.  
whitehouse.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…
Guess I wasn’t the only one that noticed! politico.com/news/2024/04/2…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenWhitehouse

Apr 15
More from Miami on the Florida property insurance market’s dangers.
miamiherald.com/news/politics-…
There’s considerable reason to believe that Florida is the leading edge of a general coastal property insurance problem nationwide, and considerable reason to believe that the coastal-risk insurance problem has an emerging wildfire-risk insurance twin out West.
For both coastal and wildfire risk, the trajectory is the same: insurance unaffordability, then uninsurability, then unmortgageability, leading to asset value crash, which could cascade out through the general economy.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 26
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, its board of directors, and its climate obstruction — quite a tale: 🧵
eenews.net/articles/clima…
“For years, the [Chamber] disputed the reality of human-caused climate change and has more recently opposed meaningful efforts to address the problem.” 

“When asked for comment, the Chamber argued it’s following the wishes of corporate donors.”
So it would seem logical for Chamber board members to ask the obvious question:  “what donors?  and how much did they give you?” 
 
Is it not a massive governance failure to serve on the board of an organization without questioning where it gets its money?
Read 5 tweets
Mar 23
Leo runs what is in essence a domestic covert operation funded by creepy billionaires who want to impose their unwelcome ideology through unrepresentative courts. 🧵
politico.com/news/2024/03/2…
The spending for the covert op is somewhere above $580 million. Probably a lot above. They are not kidding around.
And it worked. They captured the Supreme Court and turned it into their political weapon, to the benefit of polluters, Republican Party, and religious extremists.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 22
“Misguided”? The model for many of these suits was litigation the U.S. Department of Justice brought and won against the tobacco industry for fraudulently misleading people about the dangerous effects of its product.   I emphasize:  and won. 🧵
thehill.com/opinion/energy…
“Misguided”? DOJ won a court order saying to the industry, in essence, “thou shalt lie no more.”  With its fraud strategy foreclosed, the industry had to change its ways. Federal tobacco policy shifted, as without lies, tobacco lobbying practices collapsed.
“Misguided”? The result was hundreds of thousands of lives saved, because DOJ back then was willing to fight a huge battle against a monster industry’s campaign of fraud, and win.  It is a shame that today’s DOJ seems unable to summon the same resolve.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 21
America is dealing with a lot of problems caused by unchecked corporate power. I’ve got a bipartisan bill to help with that. 🧵
While working people pay their fair share in taxes, giant corporations skirt their responsibilities by exploiting tax loopholes. Since the 1950s, the corporate share of national tax revenue has fallen from around 25% to just 6%.
One of these tax loopholes is found in a sneaky place: giant mergers. Record numbers of giant mergers have created an anti-competitive economic landscape for small businesses across our country.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 10
Here’s how climate crashes into the economy: first, coastal properties/wildfire-risk properties become uninsurable; then, without insurance there aren’t mortgages for buyers; then, property values crash because no mortgages and cash-only becomes the market.bloomberg.com/features/2024-…
Here’s the variant: states set up insurers of last resort to stem the uninsurability problem, but the risk doesn’t change.
And (1) climate disasters take out the state insurers of last resort, or (2) the assigned-loss risk those insurers present causes mass flight of other insurers, so as not to be left holding the bag.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(