One demand students are calling for is Israeli divestment. Divestment is not a new request. In fact, it’s been asked for many times, most notably in the 80s to protest South African apartheid. What is less talked about is why colleges will resist divestment more than ever. 🧵/1
Colleges are resisting divestment more now than ever partially because they shifted their endowments from low risk assets to private equity and real estate hedge funds in the mid to late 80s. It caused endowments to soar and institutions to center big donors /2
Suddenly, you have hedge fund managers in the game promising big returns. The more money raised, the more returns. And this meant schools needed more money so they shifted to trying to fund fields that would produce wealthy graduates and donors (aka not humanities). /3
And one might think this would be a positive for the students and the schools, but the reality is that endowment isn’t often used for student financial aid or making tuition lower or funding staff/faculty. It’s used to increase ranking and selectivity. /4
I won’t get into all the tax implications, but there’s a tax game that wealthy donors and institutions can play. Wealthy donors can donate for tax advantages and institutions can largely avoid paying taxes because they are non-profit (capital gains) and get tax breaks. /5
So, you’re seeing wealthy donors get a lot of power because they can stipulate where the money goes (hence why you’re seeing so many threaten to stop their contributions), and you have institutions feeling obligated to them because there’s an arm race to increase endowment. /6
You have the cost of tuition increasing, college affordability decreasing, cuts in many fields of study, low pay for staff, GAs, and many faculty yet endowments grow and grow. And where is a lot of the money going? Fundraising and development for more endowment! /7
Hedge funds promise money and invest in anything that does regardless of morality. Universities want money in their endowments, so they accept it and pay BILLIONS in fees to hedge fund managers. And only a small % of the money goes to truly benefiting students/the school. /8
Israel divestment campaigns are picking up, but the changed landscape of hedge funds and endowment has made colleges more resistant, not simply because they care about Israel but because so many of their investments are tied to Israel (and the military industrial complex). /9
And because schools only use 4-5% of their endowment a year and they’re very restricted, they want more and more money. So, anything to jeopardize that will be ignored, dismissed, or rejected. And endowment is seen as a component of being elite just as “selectivity” is. /10
So in the end, colleges and hedge funds have an codependent relationship which is ultimately harming colleges and making them less financially stable. And colleges are forced to sacrifice their morality in favor of money. And students become less and less important to them. /11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Justice Jackson's dissent in the affirmative action cases was fantastic, and I'm going to point out some of the parts that impacted me the most here:
"Gulf-sized race-based gaps exist with respect to the health, wealth, and well-being of American citizens. They were created in the distant past, but have indisputably been passed down to the present day through the generations." /1
"Every moment these gaps persist is a moment in which this great country falls short of actualizing one of its foundational principles—the “self-evident” truth that all of us are created equal." /2
PA vs OH statewide should be a lesson for Ds. You see the difference in PA with candidates who committed to an active and effective appeal to young voters, progressives, and Black voters compared to OH that often tried to appear as Republican-lite and reject progressive ideas.
Tim Ryan specifically wanted to appeal to working class voters, but the problem is that he specifically treated working class as synonymous with white, which is a problem since we know the majority of white voters generally aren’t voting for Dems. /2
Tim Ryan was also actively against student loan forgiveness, which is an important issue especially for younger voters. Ryan never identified many issues that appealed to younger voters. /3
Every time I see an update related to police in Uvalde, I think about a conversation I had with a police officer well over a decade ago where we talked about how they are marketed to the public versus how they are privately encouraged to act. /1
In public, police are labeled as “courageous heroes” who will risk everything and anything to keep us safe. They are essentially treated like superheroes in a world where without them, the world would just decay and turn to anarchy. /2
In private, many police officers are told “No matter what, the goal is to get yourself home.” Anything that’s a threat to that is either to be eliminated or avoided. It also elevates what they might see as a threat, hence why the first move for many is to shoot. /3
As people are reading more about Replacement theory, it’s also important to understand ways that whiteness was constructed in this country, how it evolved, and how it was defined/left undefined. 🧵
Whiteness in this country didn’t have a “positive” legal distinction until the 1920s. Positive in this case means that whiteness wasn’t defined by what it is but rather what it isn’t. What was the reason? The Naturalization Act of 1790. /1
The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited naturalization to “free white persons of good character”. Indigenous, enslaved/free Black, Asian, indentured servants, etc. were excluded. Racial restrictions weren’t abolished until 1952 (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952) /2
Diversity statements are becoming more popular to ask for, and I've read a lot of them. Most of them are really bad. Here are a few things I'd think about when crafting one:
1) Actually DEFINE diversity and make sure you're thinking of diversity as a collective. People aren't "diverse". You aren't "diverse". And you shouldn't talk about "bringing diversity" because that makes it sound like the mere presence of someone is the important thing.
2) Talk about why diversity is important/should be valued and what the org is missing w/o diversity. You can talk about the active + historic barriers that have gotten us to where we are and contribute to why we have to "seek" diversity rather than it already being embedded.
A lot of people are discovering sundown towns. I knew about them since I was 8 years old. The reason? My family moved to a sundown town around ~1995. My family was one of the very few Black families in Hanover, PA. Here's a list: and here's some info: /1sundown.tougaloo.edu/content.php?fi…
A little about sundown towns. Wiki describes them as towns that "practice a form of racial segregation by excluding non-whites via some combination of discriminatory local laws, intimidation, and violence." To understand, let me tell you about 2 notable riots in the area. /2
First was 1969 in York, PA (Hanover is in York County, PA). York had a growing Black population, and they were protesting...you guessed it...police violence and discrimination. A White officer was killed and 100 rounds were fired at the car of a Black woman, which killed her /3