Ross Guberman & BriefCatch Profile picture
Apr 29 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Someone tipped me off to a superb
@KannonShanmugam merits brief in Jackson v. United States.

Want to write even better briefs? Here are eight ways to follow that lead.

1/10

#appellatetwitter #legaltech #legalwriting #scotus
1. Craft your Table of Contents/headings so that each level of heading or subheading functions as a syllogism that proves a larger point.

2/10 Image
2. Introduce your client or position with well-chosen nouns and verbs. Subtle narrative choices here put the defendant/petitioner in the best possible light.

3/10 Image
3. See that blockbuster 98/100 #BriefCatch "Crispy and Punchy" Score? It's no accident.

Favor short, punchy words like these and logical signposts to make for a smoother, faster ride.

4/9
Image
Image
4. Examples are priceless—but only if the court sees the link without having to work.

5/10 Image
5. Quoted language is a means to an end. Favor short snippets, and let your own points and facts dominate.

6/10
Image
Image
6. Help your points and sections cohere by linking the start of one paragraph with something the reader will remember from the paragraph before.

7/10 Image
7. When you use the "Why Should I Care?" technique, as I describe it in Point Made, anchor your "parade of horribles" in your legal analysis.

8/10Image
8. Stay classy. There's a gulf between "That was mistaken" and "The Court was clearly wrong."

9/10 Image
Bonus tip:

To vary your sentence structure, shake loose from this pattern: "Someone noted/observed/stated that something."

could have helped even this rockstar brief in that regard. Want to take your writing to the next level? your draft today!

10/10

#legaltech #appellatetwitterBriefCatch.com
BriefCatch.com
BriefCatch.comImage
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ross Guberman & BriefCatch

Ross Guberman & BriefCatch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legalwritingpro

Dec 6, 2023
Four great legal-writing takeaways from the opening of Justice Barrett's unanimous Laufer opinion.

Why is it unusually clear and readable?

#legalwriting #appellatetwitter #legaltech

1/5 Image
Lesson One: At the core of the passage are many closely paired subjects and verbs:

Laufer sued. Websites failed. The number of suits suggests. Laufer searches. Hotels settle and pay.

That's why her Passive Voice Index is so low.

2/5 BriefCatch.com

Image
Image
Lesson Two: Rigid subject-verb-object sentence patterns can get boring. Yet what's impressive here is how much variety in sentence structure Barrett attains in such a short space. In fact, no two sentences have the same structure.

3/5 Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 27, 2023
How about a litigation battle over . . . what "double-spacing" means?

66 pages of motions, oppositions, declarations (including one from Typography-for-Lawyers guru Matt Butterick!), & ruler-laden exhibits all over whether "double-space" means 24 points or 28.

1/5
#legalwriting Image
I prompted ChatGPT-4 to summarize the parties' key arguments in this pressing matter.

2/5

#AI Image
Emotions ran high.

3/5 Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 4, 2020
One way the election litigation could do good: a national moment of silence in which all 330 million of us UNCHECK THE SPELL-CHECK BOX THAT SAYS IGNORE WORDS IN UPPERCASE washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
Other inspirational reminders, in the @Atul_Gawande Checklist Manifesto style: Match the right corporate-naming-rights-for-cash venue to the right city.
Double-check court names.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 25, 2020
Justice Gorsuch manages to pack a lot of #gorsuchstyle into tonight's one-paragraph dissent. He shows personality and verve in his potshot at Vegas and hedonism and in the final sentence (the Caesars Palace/ Calvary Chapel quip brilliantly distills all three dissents). 1/
Yet even in just a single paragraph he can't resist overexplaining. "The large numbers are fine" point is redundant, and it sucks the life out of the compelling contrast between the huddling craps and roulette players and the banned religious services. "Show, don't tell." 2/
And yes, even in this lone paragraph you can see his idiosyncratic syntax. Not sure exactly what he was going for after the dash, but I think he means something like "no matter HOW LARGE the building, HOW DISTANT the individuals, or HOW PERVASIVE the masks. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(