(1/X) I wanted to do one another thread about narcissistic sociopaths because I've been dealing with one a lot lately. I think there probably is some kind of a method for dealing with them but it is complicated because...
(2/X) They behave in a way that makes no sense to others, so it is difficult to have a plan for how to deal with them, as there is no way to predict what they will do next.
(3/X) This is often their ultimate undoing (if Trump had behaved normally about COVID, he probably would have won, if Hitler hadn't invaded Russia...), but it means that in a sense they are always the actors and you are always stuck responding...
(4/X) Because there is way to do any advance planning. There is no way to anticipate their actions. This is compounded by the fact that they are good at spinning the disaster after effects of their not-thought-through actions...
(5/X) They will just say that is what they meant to do or make up some reason for why they did it or others will do that for them. Look at Putin in Ukraine. He did it for his own ego, and it's been a failure...
(6/X) But there is no shortage of people to make up reasons for why he did it (NATO expansion etc.) and to claim that fighting Ukraine to a draw is great Russian victory. He's unlikely to lose his grip on power...
(7/X) Narcissistic sociopaths are also vindictive and scare people. The combination of complete unpredictability and extreme nastiness is very scary. "Just don't make them angry" is the response many have (with Trump for example)...
(8/X) A classic example is universities where the administration is typically more afraid of abusers (who are often narcissistic sociopaths) than of the abused. The abusers are more likely to sue or make trouble, so the university typically takes their side.
(9/X) This is what I am dealing with right now. What is the solution to this imbalance? I don't know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1/X) Sorry to keep doing these, but I wanted to do one more thing about how poorly media handles the asymmetry between Trump and Democrats. This is torn directly from my real life experiences watching deans empower an abusive narcissistic sociopath...
(2/X) A way to bothsides without technically bothsiding is just to say things like "no wonder Americans are losing faith in politics". It blames no one explicitly, which means that it blames everyone implicitly...
(3/X) You can say things like "a nation divided" or "a symptom of cultural decline", but it means always means the same things: all actors are equally at fault...
I wanted to do another quick thing about how media has managed to continue doing it even as the Republican Party has become a cult of personality led by a narcissistic sociopath. Again, my observations are based on my university’s empowering of a narcissistic sociopath…(1/X)
(2/X) First, as I’ve noted before, it is always possible to bothsides anything because no person or party is perfect and you can always find some bad thing Democrats are doing that somehow equates with what Republicans are doing. But Trump does make that more challenging…
(3/X) Hardcore propagandists like Jonathan Turley will say that Trump’s insurrection was no different from Democrats asking for a recount in Florida in 2000 but for most journalists, that is a bridge too far (to their credit)….
(1/X) Sometimes I hear people wondering if it would be easier to stop Trump if we had the right kind of structures. I deal with someone like Trump (narcissistic sociopath) and the answer is "no"....
(2/X) There are already many things in place to stop him. The Senate could have DQ'ed him. Republicans could stop him now if they wanted to. Instead, even "brave" Rs like Romney refuse to endorse Biden...
(3/X) Why? I don't think it's for money or anything like that (they can't take away Mitt's car elevator), they're just weak people and it's in their code never to endorse a Democrat.
(1/X) Gonna give you my one Mitch hot take. He really f**ed up not DQing Trump in the Senate after 1/6. The country would be better off if he had, his party would be better off.....
(2/X) His initial reaction was the he wanted to. So why didn't he? Too much pushback from his party, fear of the far right, and then you can always find a reason not to do something...
(3/X) Maybe it's "you can't impeach him after he leaves office". Maybe it's "better to beat him at the ballot box." There's always a reason you can find to justify what you want to do...
(1) I see a lot of people saying "political reporters are rooting for Trump." I don't think that's true, but what's going on isn't that different. Here's what I think is going on (based on some people I know in that general area)...
(2) First of all, there is a lot of pressure not to have teh liberal bias. So you've got to be at least a little tougher on Ds than Rs. Then there's the "I was just doing my job stuff"...(2/X)
(3) "My job" for some reason includes doing a lot of vibes-based pieces, which by their very nature favor Republicans. I honestly don't know why doing vibes-based pieces is part of their job, but it's what they believe...
Quick programming note... want to cross-post to Bluesky and Threads. Is there an easy way to automate this? I don't think this account can leave here, because I've been told it does shame some of the practitioners of bad political reporting. I buy that because...(1/X)
(2/X) If liberals complain to political reporters in an earnest fashion, they just smirk and say "you mad, bro?" (See Jeff Sharlet's recent piece that ends with him talking to a Times reporter, for example.)
(3/X) But ppl don't like being laughed at, especially Times-type people who like to think of themselves as cool. They especially don't like to be laughed at in a way they can barely understand, which is what we do here.