I am tired of his face. I am tired of his style of speech. I am so tired of his lies. I am tired of his bluster, his narcissism. I am tired of his fraud and his crimes. I am tired of the relentless news coverage and the danger he poses to democracy.
I am so tired. Read on for why.👇
His Face
Or, more specifically, his facial expressions. Let’s start with the pout. It’s his way of trying to look tough, but he can’t pull it off because he isn’t tough. If we’ve learned nothing else in the last eight years, it’s that he’s a perpetually aggrieved child who can never find satisfaction and who blames everything bad that happens to him on everyone else.
Then there’s the sneer, which is worse. He saves it for those occasions when he scores a point against a perceived enemy — like getting the Mike Johnsons and Ron DeSantises of the world to come to Mar-a-Lago to kiss his ring, or on those alarming occasions when he gets away with breaking a norm (or a law) or, maybe even worse, when he gets an assist from an increasingly corrupt institution like the Supreme Court.
Together, the pout and the sneer perfectly encapsulate the tension that exists between his arrogant belief that he is utterly untouchable and his desperately fragile ego and unconscious sense that he is a weak, terrified little boy.
His Style of Speech
He just won’t stop talking. And the longer he speaks, the more he lapses into a stream of consciousness that defies logic or meaning. There is no nuance, no attempt to be coherent, no aspiration to eloquence.
Word Choice: Everything is always terrible or incredible. It is always like nothing you’ve ever seen. There are no shades of gray; only the black and white of hyperbole, because if it is in any way related to him or his enemies, it must be the best or the worst.
Asides and Non Sequiturs: He meanders without ever really getting to the point, and along the way he veers off onto a totally unrelated topic. He could be talking about nuclear weapons and then launch into a monologue about water pressure or lightbulbs while his supporters wait for a conclusion he never draws.
Repetition: When he wants to drive home a point, he doesn’t just repeat it once, he repeats it incessantly. He pounds it down. Repetition reinforces his message,even as it hides the lack of substance and factual information — and his brand of simple-minded patter makes it all the more effective. As Joseph Goebbels, minister of propaganda for Nazi Germany put it, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” In cognitive psychology, this is known as the “illusory truth effect.”
Rhetoric: He speaks down to the lowest common denominator and doesn’t hesitate to call on his followers to commit violence on his behalf, riling them up with promises to pay their lawyers or otherwise offering them immunity. It is the coward’s way, but he excels at it.
And here lies his disturbing resemblance to cult leaders. They, too, traffic in simplistic tropes and make vague promises; they see themselves as unique, chosen, and, in some cases, divine; they create a clear division between their group (the “chosen” ones) and the out group (the “enemy” or “other”). Cult leaders dehumanize the other, portraying them as inferior or inhuman (“vermin”).
Sound familiar?
When you hear that voice, rambling, repetitive, and threatening, remember: it’s not empty noise — he’s preying on the vulnerability of his followers, who at this point seem almost incapable of listening to any voice but his.
2/ His Lies
Truth was not a particularly valued commodity but this man takes lying to a whole new level. He tells lies — about the weather, about crowd sizes — that are easily disproved. He lies to his followers and to himself about himself — his wealth, his business, his record.
The truly baffling part is that many people believe him. And for every person that believes him, there are 10 who know he’s lying, but don’t care.
Narrative Necessity and Solipsistic Reality:
Does he believe his own lies? Fellow psychologist Robert Jay Lifton suggests that his belief is not always definite and fixed but has become a part of his narrative necessity. He partially believes in this falsehood while consciously manipulating it to manipulate the American public. His self-centered reality allows him to keep the belief active despite external challenges.
I think it depends to a great degree on whether or not the lie he is telling relates to him personally. In other words, if he’s lying about his net worth or his criminality or poll numbers he must out of necessity believe them — they are a defense mechanism against his own extraordinary insecurity. The alternative would be to acknowledge that he is actually a loser, and that would be intolerable for him.
3/ His Bluster
He interrupts, he talks over people, he fails to treat others with the same courtesy he demands.
His rudeness and lack of manners exists because he believes basic human decency is for suckers and weaklings.
He’s truly the worst person in any room.
The bluster is particularly hard to take knowing it is based on nothing. He may like to pretend that he’s a brilliant real estate tycoon, but this is a completely illusory image that was created decades ago by his father, propped up on a scaffolding of bank loans and lies.
And that was not all. His father was willing to stake millions of dollars on his son because he believed he could leverage the skills his son did have – as a savant of self-promotion, shameless liar, marketer, and builder of brands – to achieve the one thing that had always eluded him: a level of fame that matched his ego and satisfied his ambition in a way money alone never could.
Unfortunately, too many people since have found this bluster (clownish as it may be to most of us) useful, including Mark Burnett, who made the tragic decision to center the “Celebrity Apprentice” on a failed businessman who otherwise would have faded into obscurity.
The strut is part of the deception, the art of distraction, based on smoke and mirrors. It says look here, focus on the spectacle and not the man behind the curtain.
4/ For the rest of this list, sign up for my newsletter! (There's even more I can't say on Twitter).
Subscribe with the link in my bio.
If you would, consider upgrading! Your support helps keep critical information free for those who can't afford it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ UPDATE: I wouldn’t be surprised if the Supreme Court does Donald a massive favor with its immunity decision—call it an in-kind campaign contribution—but I’ll explain below why it may not matter in the short-term, at least in the context of Donald’s day of reckoning.
Today I counted FIVE major courtroom updates you shouldn’t miss, with the best news at the end:
1. In front of the Supreme Court, Donald’s attorney argues that his client could legally order the assassination of his political rival:
During the hearing over “absolute immunity,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked, “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person, and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?”
Without hesitation, Donald’s attorney John Sauer answered, “It would depend on the hypothetical but we can see that would well be an official act.” In other words, yes.
Let’s stop and take that in: In front of the Supreme Court of the United States, an attorney in good standing actually argued that the president should be immune from prosecution if he has his political rival assassinated.
2/ A reminder that the current Supreme Court is corrupt and illegitimate:
This hearing was brought as a result of the federal indictment of Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election which centered around his inciting an insurrection against his own government. Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife, Ginni, was intimately involved in those efforts yet, in his infinite and easily bought wisdom, Thomas has decided he does not have to recuse himself.
This is a conflict of interest so glaring, so in-your-face offensive that it’s a travesty we cannot ignore — it’s a slap in the face to the very concept of judicial impartiality.
3/ In the short-term, it really doesn’t matter what the Supreme Court rules on immunity:
The truth is that, despite today’s debacle in the Supreme Court being a win of sorts for Donald, there’s a lot more going on that is not in his favor. Because no matter what happens at the federal level, and no matter how the Court rules, Donald cannot be pardoned for state crimes.
And because, as is being demonstrated by the prosecution in the New York election interference trial, the crimes were allegedly committed before he got into the White House. As a result, presidential immunity can’t overturn his conviction either — or stop a guilty verdict before the election.
The Secret Service has even reportedly begun planning for the possibility of Donald serving time in jail.
1/ When it comes to Donald’s long list of crimes, alleged or otherwise, there’s always more beneath the surface:
Let’s take a closer look at Donald’s political action committees (PACs) and the sketchy ways they seem to be helping him pay his legal bills:
The $8 Million enigma:
According to a detailed report by Roger Sollenberger, a significant part of Donald’s legal expenses, a stunning $8 million, has been funneled to an unidentified party or parties through what seems to be a corporate middleman –Red Curve Solutions, the firm that handles their political accounting. This setup purportedly obscures the real recipients of Donald’s legal payments,potentially violating federal law and the restrictions on corporate political contributions.
2/ Sollenberger writes that these “payments are described in FEC filings as ‘reimbursements’ for legal expenses and fees. The filings suggest that Red Curve is, at least in part, functioning as a financial hub for a legal expense cost-sharing agreement between these various Trump committees.”
Reporter Zac Anderson notes, “Red Curve Solutions helps political campaigns with a range of services, including ‘comprehensive budgeting, accounting and financial management and compliance services," according to the company's LinkedIn page.
The fact that such a large sum of money is being funneled through a third party, raises several red flags. It suggests a deliberate attempt to obscure the flow of funds in order to hide the true recipients of these payments. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has strict rules about transparency in campaign finance, rules that are designed to prevent corruption and ensure the integrity of our political system. If these payments are indeed in violation of these rules, it would represent a serious breach of ethics and, potentially, a criminal act.
3/ The very real legal implications:
Legal experts have suggested this payment structure not only deprives the public of crucial information but may also be in violation of federal law. These concerns are not unfounded. At least one legal expert said the arrangement appears to be illegal… 👇
1/ UPDATE: To say today was a blow for Donald and his attorney, Todd Blanche, is an understatement.
Donald’s bad run continued as he attended this morning’s gag order hearing and the continuing testimony of David Pecker in his election interference trial.
The wheels of justice continue to grind.
I tracked the trial throughout the day and noted EIGHT significant developments in order to provide you with updates, but also to provide insights into Donald’s behavior inside and statements outside the courtroom.
Let’s begin with Donald’s disastrous contempt hearing:
Prosecutors argued that Donald’s statements outside the courtroom yesterday also violated his gag order:
As Donald’s contempt hearing began, prosecutors warned Judge Merchan that Donald’s "extrajudicial statements" posed a "very real threat" to the proceedings’ integrity. They highlighted ten examples of possible contempt and then referred to statements Donald made to reporters outside the courtroom, in which he called potential witness Michael Cohen a liar immediately after opening statements bringing the total to eleven.
It’s good to see the prosecution continue to parse Donald’s statements and sift through his Truth Social posts, but unless Merchan makes the consequences sufficiently severe, Donald will have no reason to stop flouting Merchan’s authority — and his gag order.
2/ Prosecution asked Merchan to warn Donald he could be thrown in jail
The prosecution is calling for a fine of $1,000 per violation, and requested that Judge Merchan warns Donald that jail could be next. The prosecution also wants Donald to be ordered to remove his offending social media posts.
I can tell that this entire hearing likely left Donald seething with an impotent rage.
First, he’ll find any demand to remove his posts infuriating, an indication that his loss of control extends beyond the courtroom.
Second, the mere suggestion that he could face jail time for non-compliance is beyond Donald’s comprehension. Being incarcerated for even a day would likely be beyond Donald’s ability to manage.
3/ Judge Merchan SHOUTS at Donald’s attorney:
There are few things a defendant would prefer to avoid at their criminal trial: slam dunk evidence presented by the prosecutor, and the judge yelling at their attorney. Today Donald experienced both.
By all accounts, Merchan is a calm and even-keeled jurist so his response to Blanche’s ineptitude and disrespect was shocking, if well-deserved:
Merchan shouted: "I'm asking the questions. I'm going to be the one who decides whether your client is in contempt… I keep asking you over and over again for a specific answer, and I’m not getting an answer.”
I knew this wasn’t going to go well for Donald’s team today. But this is much, much worse than I could’ve hoped for.
1/ Today was a great day for justice and a BAD one for Donald. Read on:
In two different New York City courtrooms, Donald was forced to start grappling with the consequences of his years—and in some cases decades—long flouting of the law.
I followed both proceedings today and found TEN key updates that you should know about. Let’s dive in.
Today is the beginning of Donald’s reckoning
In one room, prosecutors exposed Donald’s alleged criminal conspiracy to interfere with the election: the hush money payments; the deal with former America Media CEO David Pecker to have The National Enquirer run positive coverage of Donald while simultaneously attacking his opponents; the sketchy accounting used to hide the truth from American voters before the 2016 election were all outlined in the prosecution’s opening statement for a jury to see.
In another room, Letitia James was fighting to reinforce Donald’s bond, a symbolic gesture that signals the end of an era of Donald’s impunity.
We’ve waited years for this moment because the wheels of justice grind slowly. But justice is catching up and today. And for that, I am grateful. It’s a day that has been a long time coming.
2/ Donald’s biggest fear is coming true: The world is seeing him as the loser he is:
As someone who has known Donald for almost six decades (oy), I can tell you that beneath the bluster, there lies a fear so profound, it consumes him. It’s not the fear of losing his wealth or power or his status — although, to be clear, he lives in terror of these things as well — it’s something more personal: It’s the fear of being seen as a loser.
Donald has spent a lifetime, with a seemingly endless stream of help from various sources, building an image of success and invincibility. He’s crafted a persona that, to people who knew him from The Apprentice, made him appear larger than life. The truth is, though, it’s all smoke and mirrors. The reality of Donald is that he is nothing of what he has claimed to be. And his greatest fear is that the rest of the world will finally find that out.
This is exactly what is unfolding in Judge Merchan’s courtroom — a place in which Donald has no power, no control, and no authority.
As David Axelrod notes:
“...As Trump sits and watches the criminal trial he hoped to avoid unfold, he must know that a potential reckoning he has spent a lifetime eluding could be coming. He has been reduced to a criminal defendant in a courtroom where someone else has absolute power and the rules very definitely apply. The weariness and vulnerability captured in those courtroom images betray a growing recognition that he could wind up as the thing his old man most reviled.”
“A convicted criminal? No, worse. A loser.”
3/ The one major flaw of Donald’s defense that many missed
Meanwhile, as the criminal election interference trial unfolds, Donald’s defense already appears to be on shaky ground.
More significantly, a legal expert suggested that Donald’s attorneys have made a mistake so big, it has undermined their entire case and could lead to a slam dunk guilty verdict.
Why did Donald’s defense completely fall apart? Here is the answer:
1/ UPDATE: A New York courtroom sets its stage for Donald’s dramatic downfall. As the gavel echoes, his once formidable power crumbles, and his psyche begins to fray at the edges. Uncover the unraveling of a man under the harsh spotlight of justice. My thoughts below.👇
Donald, Unprecedented:
There are a lot of crucially important events unfolding across the country (Supreme Court decisions, chaos in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives) and the world (Ukraine, Sudan, Israel, and Palestine), so in some ways it seems perverse, once again, to focus so much attention on one man. The fact remains, however, that the trial taking place in Room 1530 in the Manhattan Criminal Court will have a massive and complicated impact on the future of this country.
For the first time in American history, a former occupant of the White House is facing criminal charges. As David Corn of Mother Jones put it, “[Donald] keeps setting new Guinness Records in terms of unprecedented history.”
The reality is, the future of the country is, to a significant degree, tied to the future of Donald Trump.
2/ Standard Operating Procedure:
Before jury selection began, Judge Merchan took Donald through the Parker warning — standard operating procedure in a criminal trial:
“You have the right to be present during the trial and to assist your attorneys. Do you understand?”
“Yes.”
“If you disrupt the proceedings, you can be excluded from the courtroom and committed to jail based on your conduct, and the trial will continue on in your absence. Do you understand?”
“I do.”
“If you do not show up, there will be an arrest. Do you understand?”
“I do.”
Per the judge’s instructions, Donald will be stuck in that New York City courtroom for at least four days a week and eight hours a day. He is not free to come and go as he pleases. He needs to ask for permission if he wants, for example, to attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court for the presidential immunity case (denied) or his son’s high school graduation (despite the fact that he didn’t attend the high school graduations of his four older children). The decision is pending, despite Donald’s claim that the judge has already ruled against him.
No doubt Donald feels as though he’s being singled out for extraordinary punishment, but that’s because he has so rarely been in a situation in which he has no control over either the narrative or the proceedings. Because this is a criminal trial, he will have virtually no say about anything that happens inside that courtroom and, indeed, over anything that happens to him if he steps outside the lines that Judge Merchan draws.
Donald doesn’t handle it well when he feels like the walls are closing in on him. He freaks out — and acts out — when he feels thwarted because he so rarely ever has been. We’re looking at a very old and fairly complex psychology that goes back to his childhood. The crows finally coming home to roost when he’s in his late 70s is something that he’s not going to be able to manage.
We’re going to be seeing Donald Trump in a unique context for which he is totally unprepared. At a rally or at a press conference, he controls the room. He is determining the narrative, and any gaps or ramblings can be put down to the fact that he’s riffing or being extemporaneous or doing improv.
In the courtroom, however, Donald can’t speak out of turn — he will be subject to the judge’s rules. And a lot of people are going to see certain traits, like his thuggishness, his temper, his sense of grievance, that may play well to some in certain settings, but that in this setting will come across very differently. He will be seen to be rude, weak, and incapable of controlling himself when bound by the same rules to which the rest of us must conform.
There’s a reason he tried to get this case delayed until the 11th hour. Even after one day, it was clear Donald wasn’t faring well. He’s experiencing serious psychological trauma. The narcissistic wound that he’s suffering right now is basically short-circuiting him.
3/ We Deserve Cameras in the Courtroom:
It’s a travesty that there are no cameras or live audio feed in the courtroom. Thankfully there are several reporters in the courthouse able to live tweet, so we do get some sort of a play-by-play, but that doesn’t make up for not being able to see and hear what’s actually going on — from Donald’s demeanor, facial expressions, and body language to the jurors’ reactions, the tone of the counsel’s questions, and the judge’s rulings.
As was the case in his recent civil trial, Donald will make use of the media to give his spin in the courthouse hallway at every opportunity. The very first time he stepped up to the microphones yesterday morning, he lied constantly. In the two- to three-minute rant, he said one true thing. “Nothing like this has ever happened before.” Everything else was a lie. That is a pretty simple declarative statement, and it also underscores the fact that the media should not cover any of these statements.
Whether having cameras in the courtroom would help or hurt Donald is irrelevant, just as the political fallout from or people’s reactions to the verdict, one way or the other, are irrelevant. This is one of the most significant trials in American history. It is simply a matter of fairness to the American people. It benefits all of us to be able to see the wheels of justice turning — which by the way, we’ve been denied for a very, very long time.
For the sake of fairness and transparency, the rules around this issue need to change.
1/ UPDATE: Donald’s first day in court, and the hits keep coming! Judge Merchan threatens Donald with JAIL; Trump Media stock plummets; Donald can’t stay awake.
Read to the end for TEN trial updates, including the moment Donald GETS IN HIS LAWYER’S FACE! 👀👇
Today Donald became the first person in history to sit for his own criminal trial after leaving the Oval Office.
Overall, today marks a significant milestone — the rule of law, at least in this one instance, is holding and the wheels of justice are starting to turn a little faster.
2/ An ex-prosecutor says Donald will blow his defense by being in the courtroom
While Donald’s presence was not mandatory during his civil fraud trial, he is required to attend his criminal trial in person. Today, he whispered exasperated comments to his attorney, he glared at New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman who reported on his nap, and, according to Haberman, even falsely claimed he stormed out of court in a fundraising email.
Knowing Donald, his characteristic bluster, sense of grievance, and lack of impulse control will be on full display during the trial. Whether he’s making faces or making audible comments when he shouldn’t be speaking at all, his lack of respect and anger could have a tremendous influence on the jury.
During his fraud trial, Donald was heard making disparaging comments, glaring at opposing counsel, and storming out. That trial did not end well for him.
In an appearance on MSNBC, legal expert David Henderson said these same “antics” could prove to be Donald’s undoing: “You start whining and making faces and pouting in front of the judge, what tends to happen in a trial is … that can affect the outcome of the case,” he said.
Of course, there is the risk of jail too...
3/ Judge Merchan promises “there will be an arrest” and warns Donald to behave in court:
Judge Merchan made it clear to Donald that he must attend his Manhattan trial and refrain from disrupting proceedings, or he will be sent to jail.
This warning, known as a Parker warning, takes on a certain resonance when read to a former leader of the free world and who is currently a candidate for president.
This is a great sign that Merchan will treat Donald like any other criminal defendant, and not give him any special treatment.
Then this happened...
Donald “gets in his lawyers face” and pushes him to fight harder...