Michael Pettis Profile picture
May 2 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/9
An awful lot of prominent people still don't understand how the balance of payments works. The vice-dean of Renmin University’s School of International Studies, for example, has called for China to continue reducing its USD holdings.

via @scmpnewssc.mp/78xma?utm_sour…
2/9
In fact China isn't reducing its holdings of USD assets. It is increasing them. The PBoC may be selling part of its direct holdings of US government bonds, but Beijing overall continues to increase its holdings of USD governments, agencies and other assets.
3/9
It has no choice. It runs the largest trade surplus in the world, and while its current account surplus is much smaller, there is strong reason to believe that the current account includes flows that would more correctly show up in the capital account.
4/9
That means it is acquiring a huge amount of foreign assets, and with the US running by far the world's largest current account deficit, China has little choice but to acquire dollar assets, especially given its increasing reluctance to hold developing-country assets.
5/9
It is worth considering what would happen if China really did try to diversify out of the dollar. The most obvious way, of course, is for China to stop acquiring foreign assets, which just means for it to eliminate its trade surplus.
6/9
China's large trade surplus, however, is the flip side of its very weak domestic demand, and so until it embarks on a major restructuring of its economy, China cannot reduce its trade surplus without a sharp contraction in GDP growth.
7/9
Alternatively, China can shift out of US dollars and into euros and Japanese yen. Of course this means that the US deficit would contract as the dollar gradually weakened to be replaced by a switch in Europe and Japan from surpluses to deficits.
8/9
That would cause consternation and anger in Europe and Japan as they too, suffer from relatively weak domestic demand, and the consequences for their economies would be weaker manufacturing and slower growth.
9/9
What many people still don't understand, even those who should know better, is that the so-called "exorbitant privilege" is a privilege that only the US and the UK seem to be willing accept, and even then, I hope, not for much longer.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

May 2
1/10
In response to a question on Chinese overcapacity at this week's press conference, the Foreign Ministry's Lin Jian responded: "The “China overcapacity” accusation may look like an economic discussion, but the truth is, the accusation is built on...

fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_6…
2/10
false logic and ignores more than 200 years of the basic concept of comparative advantage in Western economics. All countries produce and export products of their comparative advantage and this is the nature of international trade."
3/10
"If a country," he continues, "should be accused of overcapacity and asked to cut capacity whenever it produces more than its domestic demand, then what would countries trade with?"

ft.com/content/879f5d…
Read 10 tweets
May 2
1/8
Bloomberg: "Yen intervention alone cannot alter the wide gulf in interest rates that’s driving the currency’s decline."

This is a classic illustration of the Mundell-Fleming impossible trinity.

via @marketsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/8
As long as the US maintains completely open capital accounts, the Fed cannot choose an appropriate interest rate for the US economy without having the economy affected (undermined, in this case) by the resulting impact on the currency.
3/8
US interest rates are higher than in countries like Japan and China in large part because Japan and China are trade surplus counties with very weak domestic demand. But because of these higher interest rates, inflows into the US dollar drive up the value of the dollar.
Read 8 tweets
May 1
1/8
Good FT article on China's intractably unbalanced economy: "China’s seeming reluctance to rebalance its economy is one of the great challenges facing global financial systems, threatening to worsen Beijing’s trade and diplomatic relations."

via @ftft.com/content/35471c…
2/8
The Chinese economy has locked itself into a system in which every economic problem is met by supply-side policies that expand investment or, more precisely, that force households to increase their indirect transfers to investment and manufacturing.
3/8
But when the problem is excess savings, the solution cannot be to boost the supply side further. It must be to boost the demand side, something China finds extraordinarily difficult to do, largely because it would mean unwinding political, financial, business and other...
Read 8 tweets
Apr 30
1/8
"High Fed rates, a response to stubborn inflation, mean that American assets offer better returns than much of the world, and investors need dollars to buy them."

This creates a double whammy for US producers.

nytimes.com/2024/04/29/bus…
2/8
High inflation rates mean that the prices of US-produced products are rising relative to those produced abroad or, which is the same thing, that the US dollar is appreciating in real terms. A nominally rising US dollar simply reinforces this process.
3/8
Because US consumers are able to benefit from cheaper foreign goods, the net impact is that foreign buying of US dollars is effectively forcing the US into a kind of "industrial policy", in which US producers are forced to subsidize US consumers.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 30
1/11
In my latest piece for the FT, I argue that there are two very different trade-related conflicts involving China that are too often conflated. On the one had is the problem of excess capacity in certain industries.

via @ftft.com/content/879f5d…
2/11
Beijing wants China to have a comparative advantage in producing certain products, like electric vehicles, solar panels, batteries and ships. Beijing has every right to support and protect these industries, but of course so do the US, the EU and other economies.
3/11
This conflict is about deciding who will dominate the strategically important industries of the future. It is likely to lead to subsidies, protection, and ultimately overcapacity in some sectors, but this is something major economies have always fought over.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 29
1/6
Bloomberg says that there is a small but rising expectation of an RMB maxi-devaluation: "Supporters of a sharp currency depreciation say it would allow Beijing boost exports and give the central bank room to cut interest rates."

via @marketsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/6
The idea that China's economic problem is weak exports, and the way out of its slowdown is to accelerate exports further, is a strange one. China's biggest economic problem is clearly weak domestic demand.
3/6
A large devaluation, by implying a large income transfer from households (as net importers) to businesses, would only reduce the household share of GDP further. This would worsen the country's consumption imbalance. It would reduce growth.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(