Monali C. Rahalkar Profile picture
May 2 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Here, in the Baric transcribed interview, he doesn't remember when he was added on the grant-he says 2019/2020! Wasn't it from early 2019? That's astonishing! He was added in phase 2, and look what he was supposed to perform: Image
His role was "to study a couple of viruses that the WIV found that they were willing to share with him". Remember, that this is exactly the grant renewal where they talked about 10-25% differences in the spike compared to SARS1. They also were going to create consensus/synthetics
As far as I remember, they planned to prepare 2-3 synthetic constructs per year, based on the sequences WIV gave them (NIH grant renewal plan). So basically, if WIV had a backbone, Baric knew how to create synthetic using his 6 piece strategy, that was it! Please check lines 4070
Here is the transcript: oversight.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
Also, this: creating a mouse adapted SARS-2 by serial passage! Baric was the master in all such techniques! Image
Please unroll @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Monali C. Rahalkar

Monali C. Rahalkar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MonaRahalkar

May 3
When someone starts giving so long explanation, you become suspicious. Eg. no one has given so long explanation about why its impossible to build SARS-2 from RaTG13. Baric says: Image
What if they had a close progenitor eg. the original sequence of 4991 of which they made a full length clone? As the pandemic broke out, it would show a very high % similarity to SARS-2. Hence, if a clone with 96.2% similarity was built, and mixed with some bat tissue, etc.
The above possibility is shared because, in the RaTg13 metagenome, there are very less bacteria, major reads are bad, the viral reads are very good and almost a complete viral genome can be assembled. Qs. is, could Baric have helped in such a thing? Read above explanation by him.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 24
My poem, originally written in Marathi, translated:
Pl find as a thread:
Millions of people struggled for breath,
While suffering endlessly, they died alone..
Leaving the whole world a mission,
To find out why they were gone..
'With the flame of knowledge,
You find the trace..
Why Destiny devastated,
The smile on our face..’
We dug and guarded the plantlets of truth so dearly,
Though, falsehood and selfishness
Burned them in fire, merely.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 23
1. With no prior experience in public health area, just due to sincerity to dig the truth, I and @BahulikarRahul started studying RaTG13, early May. We both are a scientist couple. RaTG13/4991 looked unique and similar to sars2.
2.Connecting three papers: Shi Zhengli Interview in SA, a News in Science and Ge et al 2016 led us to the mine, miners and WIV connection to RaTG13, the closest relative that time, to sars2.
3. This led us to our preprint and the paper
It seems that Fauci and Farrar were privately discussing about the miners virus and its importance around August 2020.frontiersin.org/journals/publi…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 22
1. Our paper about the miners was originally submitted to Nature, under Matters arising category back on 16th May 2020. That time we never had explored Twitter so never heard that people were discussing COVID origins there.
2. Nature in their automatic reply suggested to publish as preprint which we did soon. Then contacted by @TheSeeker268 and got connected with the Twitter group. Later on found out that this group was named Drastic!
3. As Seeker updated us the Masters thesis, we added this to our preprint version 1 and on 24th May version two was published.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 4, 2023
The paper tweeted by @franciscodeasis is very important: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Here they are trying to say that they learnt about trypsin treatment for culturing sars-like coronaviruses. But they already knew that trypsin is the key, eg SADS paper. Plus the MERS paper by their own group.
Here they declare that they have a bio bank of sarslike coronaviruses collected from 2012-19.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 4, 2023
With bare minimum tools like an internet connection and a laptop or a desktop, the internet sleuths, scientists have dug out tremendous information about covid origins! And of course with a functioning brain! 😃
We all were mocked, laughed upon or were made embarrassed for hypothesising the lab leak based on our set of investigations. Which were based on open source data, of course. But needed tremendous patience and hard work..
Now the intelligence agencies which have a huge staff and access to other resources come up with similar conclusions.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(