On April 5th, @nathancofnas was fired from Emmanuel College at @Cambridge_Uni after arguing that conservatives must accept ‘‘race realism” in order to defeat “the woke left”
Today, the most famous philosophers in the world came out in support of Cofnas' free speech
THREAD🧵:
Today, the most famous philosophers in the world came out in support of Cofnas' free speech
THREAD🧵:
On February 5th, Cofnas published a Substack article arguing that in order for conservatives to defeat “the woke left” they must accept ‘‘race realism”
I would recommend not only reading it, but also reading all 200+ comments at the bottom of it.
ncofnas.com/p/a-guide-for-…
I would recommend not only reading it, but also reading all 200+ comments at the bottom of it.
ncofnas.com/p/a-guide-for-…
Cofnas gave an interview today defending this position:
https://twitter.com/nathancofnas/status/1786076354221367670
The proper way to reject his ideas is to prove them wrong. Until counterarguments are substantiated, the denial of a platform to articulate dissenting perspectives constitutes a grave injustice.
karlstack.com/p/philosophy-h…
karlstack.com/p/philosophy-h…
Instead of debating his ideas, Cambridge campus threw a hissy fit, launched a petition to terminate his employment which defamed him as a ‘‘eugenecist’’, and held a ‘‘Fire Cofnas rally’’
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1764043656208818360
Shortly after that rally, the Leverhulme Trust (which funds his postdoc) and Cambridge both launched investigations into his employment, while on April 5th Emmanuel College, where Cofnas holds an unpaid position, fired him. His main job is with the University, and they haven’t fired him from that yet, but they still might.
Emmanuel College justified its firing because Cofnas ‘‘rejected DEI policies’’.
''The Committee first considered the meaning of the blog and concluded that it amounted to, or could reasonably be construed as amounting to, a rejection of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion (DEI and EDI) policies… The Committee concluded that the core mission of the College was to achieve educational excellence and that diversity and inclusion were inseparable from that. The ideas promoted by the blog therefore represented a challenge to the College’s core values and mission.''
Emmanuel College justified its firing because Cofnas ‘‘rejected DEI policies’’.
''The Committee first considered the meaning of the blog and concluded that it amounted to, or could reasonably be construed as amounting to, a rejection of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion (DEI and EDI) policies… The Committee concluded that the core mission of the College was to achieve educational excellence and that diversity and inclusion were inseparable from that. The ideas promoted by the blog therefore represented a challenge to the College’s core values and mission.''
On April 12th, the most famous philosopher in the world, Peter Singer (Singer has 41528 citations on Google Scholar), stood up for Cofnas by writing a full-throated blog post:
''These sentences imply that at Emmanuel College, freedom of expression does not include the freedom to challenge its DEI policies, and that challenging them may be grounds for dismissal. That is an extraordinary statement for a tertiary institution to make. It is even more surprising given that the adoption of DEI policies is a relatively recent phenomenon.
Emmanuel College’s decision does not prevent Cofnas from continuing to hold his research fellowship in the Faculty of Philosophy. But that would cease to be the case if the university inquiry were to reach the same conclusion as the college.
The academic world will be watching what happens. Were the University of Cambridge to dismiss Cofnas, it would sound a warning to students and academics everywhere: when it comes to controversial topics, even the world’s most renowned universities can no longer be relied upon to stand by their commitment to defend freedom of thought and discussion.''
''These sentences imply that at Emmanuel College, freedom of expression does not include the freedom to challenge its DEI policies, and that challenging them may be grounds for dismissal. That is an extraordinary statement for a tertiary institution to make. It is even more surprising given that the adoption of DEI policies is a relatively recent phenomenon.
Emmanuel College’s decision does not prevent Cofnas from continuing to hold his research fellowship in the Faculty of Philosophy. But that would cease to be the case if the university inquiry were to reach the same conclusion as the college.
The academic world will be watching what happens. Were the University of Cambridge to dismiss Cofnas, it would sound a warning to students and academics everywhere: when it comes to controversial topics, even the world’s most renowned universities can no longer be relied upon to stand by their commitment to defend freedom of thought and discussion.''
Today, a group of philosophers published a letter in The Times defending Cofnas:
thetimes.co.uk/article/times-…
thetimes.co.uk/article/times-…
That letter is paywalled, but here is the full text:
''We were dismayed to learn that Dr Nathan Cofnas, a researcher at Cambridge University’s Faculty of Philosophy and a research associate at Emmanuel College, is to be expelled from the college and is the subject of investigations by the faculty and the Leverhulme Trust on the grounds that he made controversial comments about race and academic ability (“Cambridge in free-speech row over researcher’s ‘race realism’ blog”, Apr 19). Cambridge University’s initial response seems to us to have been completely correct. Professor Bhaskar Vira, pro-vice-chancellor for education, issued a statement that began: “Freedom of speech within the law is a right that sits at the heart of the University of Cambridge. We encourage our community to challenge ideas they disagree with and engage in rigorous debate.” Given this, we do not understand why the philosophy faculty is conducting an investigation. Members of the college or university who disagree with Dr Cofnas’s views could issue statements repudiating those views and explaining why they believe them to be mistaken.
We urge Emmanuel College to reverse its decision and the Faculty of Philosophy and the Leverhulme Trust to call off their investigations. There is nothing to investigate. This should not need to be said, but given the present climate we would like to add that signing this letter does not indicate endorsement of Dr Cofnas’s views.''
''We were dismayed to learn that Dr Nathan Cofnas, a researcher at Cambridge University’s Faculty of Philosophy and a research associate at Emmanuel College, is to be expelled from the college and is the subject of investigations by the faculty and the Leverhulme Trust on the grounds that he made controversial comments about race and academic ability (“Cambridge in free-speech row over researcher’s ‘race realism’ blog”, Apr 19). Cambridge University’s initial response seems to us to have been completely correct. Professor Bhaskar Vira, pro-vice-chancellor for education, issued a statement that began: “Freedom of speech within the law is a right that sits at the heart of the University of Cambridge. We encourage our community to challenge ideas they disagree with and engage in rigorous debate.” Given this, we do not understand why the philosophy faculty is conducting an investigation. Members of the college or university who disagree with Dr Cofnas’s views could issue statements repudiating those views and explaining why they believe them to be mistaken.
We urge Emmanuel College to reverse its decision and the Faculty of Philosophy and the Leverhulme Trust to call off their investigations. There is nothing to investigate. This should not need to be said, but given the present climate we would like to add that signing this letter does not indicate endorsement of Dr Cofnas’s views.''
Proving that Cofnas isn’t some alt-right crackpot, this letter was signed by:
Roger Crisp, Oxford University; Sir Partha Dasgupta, Cambridge University; Marie Daouda, Oxford University; Paul Elbourne, Oxford University; Jonathan Glover, KCL; Coleman Hughes, author; Matthew Kramer, Cambridge University; Brian Leiter, Chicago University; Jeff McMahan, Oxford University; Francesca Minerva, Milan University; Steven Pinker, Harvard University; Robert Plomin, KCL; Peter Singer, Princeton University; Amia Srinivasan, Oxford University
Roger Crisp, Oxford University; Sir Partha Dasgupta, Cambridge University; Marie Daouda, Oxford University; Paul Elbourne, Oxford University; Jonathan Glover, KCL; Coleman Hughes, author; Matthew Kramer, Cambridge University; Brian Leiter, Chicago University; Jeff McMahan, Oxford University; Francesca Minerva, Milan University; Steven Pinker, Harvard University; Robert Plomin, KCL; Peter Singer, Princeton University; Amia Srinivasan, Oxford University
I reached out to @SpeechUnion, who are defending Cofnas throughout the ongoing investigation, for an exclusive comment. This is their statement:
''The Free Speech Union is proud to assist Nathan Cofnas in his current dispute with Emmanuel College and the University of Cambridge. The stellar and diverse list of academic philosophers who wrote to the Times today shows how important this dispute is to all scholars who seek the freedom of intellectual exploration, regardless of where they stand on the issues discussed by Dr Cofnas. Academics, and especially philosophers, explore ethically difficult matters. The premises they begin from may take them to conclusions that offend or even horrify others. Free institutions don’t tell academics how they should reason their way from a premise to a conclusion, nor should they say that certain questions are prohibited from the off. The only tolerable solution is for universities to step up to the challenge of pluralism, and insist that offended students and staff learn to live with difference of opinion – or, even better, engage with and improve the arguments of those they disagree with. The Free Speech Union hopes that Emmanuel and Cambridge come to realise that meeting that challenge is integral to their purpose and credibility as educational institutions.''
''The Free Speech Union is proud to assist Nathan Cofnas in his current dispute with Emmanuel College and the University of Cambridge. The stellar and diverse list of academic philosophers who wrote to the Times today shows how important this dispute is to all scholars who seek the freedom of intellectual exploration, regardless of where they stand on the issues discussed by Dr Cofnas. Academics, and especially philosophers, explore ethically difficult matters. The premises they begin from may take them to conclusions that offend or even horrify others. Free institutions don’t tell academics how they should reason their way from a premise to a conclusion, nor should they say that certain questions are prohibited from the off. The only tolerable solution is for universities to step up to the challenge of pluralism, and insist that offended students and staff learn to live with difference of opinion – or, even better, engage with and improve the arguments of those they disagree with. The Free Speech Union hopes that Emmanuel and Cambridge come to realise that meeting that challenge is integral to their purpose and credibility as educational institutions.''
And please read/share my full article!!
Philosophy heavyweights defend free speech after Cambridge lecturer is canceled over Substack article that constituted a ''rejection of DEI policies''
karlstack.com/p/philosophy-h…
Philosophy heavyweights defend free speech after Cambridge lecturer is canceled over Substack article that constituted a ''rejection of DEI policies''
karlstack.com/p/philosophy-h…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
