Sequencing ideas from more general to specific can help build meaningful learning.
Here's how:
↓
(bonus points for identifying the diagram)
The short answer (popularised by David Ausubel) is that making learning meaningful is largely the result of...
building connections with what we already know.
✨
The more connections we forge, the deeper our understanding and the more durable our memory.
The opposite of meaningful learning occurs when we learn things by rote and build isolated islands of knowledge.
“In rote learning, we acquire isolated facts and rules that we can parrot back on an exam but that we cannot necessarily use.”
— David Ausubel
How can we build meaningful learning? There are 3 main strategies:
1. Sequencing ideas from more general to specific. 2. Activating prior knowledge before introducing new. 3. Generating connections between new ideas and old.
For now, let's just focus on #1
Ausubel argues that knowledge tends to be organised hierarchically, and that the most efficient way to help someone learn is to sequence curricular ideas from the more general to the more specific.
For example:
IN HISTORY
Begin a unit on WWII by first discussing the broader concepts of conflict and reasons nations go to war...
before delving into the specific events and key people.
IN BIOLOGY
When teaching about cells, start with its role as the basic unit of life and the distinction between types of cells...
before diving deeper into organelles and processes.
IN LITERATURE
If studying Romeo and Juliet, begin by discussing the Renaissance and the nature of tragedies...
before digging into the plot and characters.
This approach has the potential to shore up learning because
(A) general concepts act as a contextual ‘anchor’ for subsequent ideas, making them sticker, and
(B) they provide advance organisation for subsequent ideas, making them easier to access in the future.
NUANCE
Now, there is also some evidence that an understanding of the general can be effectively achieved through multiple (and varied) specific examples...
but there is no reason why both approaches can’t be used in combination.
(I think)
CAVEAT
Not all subjects are hierarchical in disciplinary structure, and so this approach may not be so relevant in some contexts.
🎓 For more, check out this paper exploring the nuances of prior knowledge and cognitive load ⤵️
• Meaningful learning is largely about making connections.
• One way to achieve this is by sequencing ideas from general to specific.
• This can help students to anchor and better organise their understanding.
Pedagogical Fit (and how it relates to adaptive expertise)
One of my fav ideas:
↓
What our students pay attention to and think about is what they end up learning.
There are a variety of tools we can deploy to guide thinking, some better (such as elaboration or retrieval), some worse (such as learning styles and brain gym).
However, effective teaching is not just about having the right tools to hand, it’s also about choosing the right tool for the job.
Prompting students to externalise their thinking through activities such as talking, writing, or drawing can enhance learning.
This works by focusing attention, strengthening encoding, and fostering clarity of thought.
During externalisation, if we prompt students to expand upon new ideas, integrate them with prior knowledge, or organise them in more meaningful ways, we can help them to deepen their understanding and better apply it to new situations.
The myth of learning styles is pervasive across society (and even education). But what exactly makes it so attractive?
One compelling—albeit more theoretical than empirical—argument is that such concepts hold a modern-day ‘moral appeal’.
We live in a society that places a high value on individuality, personal choice, and the inherent superiority of natural traits.
Understandably so—these are the cornerstones of liberal democracy and romanticism, the grand narratives upon which many Western nations have been built.