The Neo-Gothic National Cathedral in Washington D.C. has all of that.
Construction started in 1908 and it was finished in 1990, although some work is still ongoing after an earthquake in 2011.
Like Medieval cathedrals, this building was several generations in the making.
True to form it has an array of stained glass windows, choir stalls, a clerestory, a triforium, and a large stone reredos:
Plus those fabulous rows of Gothic rib vaulting and clustered columns that draw the eye upwards:
Nor to forget flying buttresses, along with a soaring central tower, rose windows, and crocketed pinnacles:
Now, most Medieval cathedrals are not purely of one style.
They were built, expanded, part-demolished, damaged, and rebuilt over the course of centuries.
Thus they inevitably contain multiple phases of construction and multiple architectural styles mixed in together:
This effect was recreated at the National Cathedral.
The crypt chapels were built in Romanesque style —notice the rounded arches — which directly preceded the Gothic in the 10th and 11th centuries.
Many European cathedrals have similar remnants of Romanesque design.
But the bulk of the National Cathedral is designed in the "Decorated Gothic", an English subgenre of Gothic architecture which appeared in the 13th and 14th centuries — although there are a handful of French architectural motifs too.
The National Cathedral wasn't built exclusively with Medieval methods and materials — steel and concrete were used.
But that doesn't make it inauthentic. As the 19th century French restorer Viollet-le-Duc said, Medieval architects would have happily used these materials.
So the National Cathedral is a faithful recreation of Medieval architecture — and a very impressive building in its own right.
But Gothic architecture was about more than the outward appearance of pointed arches and flying buttresses...
As the great John Ruskin wrote in the 1840s, Gothic Architecture was partly defined by the freedom it gave to individual architects and masons to pursue their own creative inclinations.
Gothic was not the work of one master designer, but the product of a whole community.
Ruskin's point is that Gothic was not a single, unified architectural style with a list of rules to be followed.
Asymmetry and variation were a natural consequence, as at Rouen Cathedral, below.
Every single Medieval Gothic building is designed and decorated differently.
This was understood well by the designers of the National Cathedral in Washington.
Notice, for example, that the capitals (the decorative part at the top of a pillar) are all different.
True to the spirit of Gothic.
Sculptors were given the freedom to decorate the cathedral with their own interpretations of religious stories, among them Roger Morigi, Frederick Hart, Jay Hall Carpenter, and Patrick Plunkett.
Consider the tympanums (the triangular section above a door) and their variety:
One thing you notice about original Medieval cathedrals is the sheer variety of their decorations, both of content and form.
There is a mind-boggling mix of nightmarish creatures, caricatures, beautiful statuary, and vulgar jokes.
The Medieval imagination was all-encompassing.
Again, this is a natural consequence of how Gothic was an adaptable, ever-changing form of architecture.
For example, local traditions and customs were inevitably integrated into church decoration.
Like the "Green Man", a pagan motif widely incorporated into Gothic art:
And, of course, the famous gargoyles and grotesques of Medieval cathedrals were usually fearsome and frightning creatures, perhaps intended to ward off evil spirits.
Maybe Darth Vader is the modern equivalent of Medieval dragons and ghouls.
All these factors mean the Darth Vader sculpture — which was carved by Jay Carpenter after a childrens' design competition in the 1980s — is a perfectly appropriate way to decorate the cathedral.
It is exactly what Medieval masons would have done, had they ever seen Star Wars.
So this Darth Vader sculpture is authentically Gothic — without it, and other similarly "modern" additions, the cathedral would simply be a cold imitation.
Because the Gothic was fundamentally a living form of architecture, and the best Neo-Gothic design recognises that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When Vincent van Gogh started painting he didn't use any bright colours — so what happened?
It isn't just about art.
This is a story about how we're all changed by the things we consume, the places we go, and the people we choose to spend time with...
The year is 1881.
A 27 year old former teacher and missionary from the Netherlands called Vincent van Gogh decides to try and become a full-time artist, after being encouraged by his brother Theo.
What does he paint? The peasants of the countryside where his parents lived.
Vincent van Gogh's early work is unrecognisably different from the vibrant painter now beloved around the world.
Why?
Many reasons, though one of the most important is that he had been influenced by his cousin, the Realist painter Anton Mauve, who painted like this:
He rose from obscurity, joined a revolution, became an emperor, tried to conquer Europe, failed, spent his last days in exile — and changed the world forever.
This is the life of Napoleon, told in 19 paintings:
1. Bonaparte at the Pont d'Arcole by Antoine-Jean Gros (1796)
Napoleon's life during the French Revolution was complicated, but by the age of 24 he was already a General.
Here, aged just 27, he led the armies of the French Republic to victory in Italy — his star was rising.
2. The Battle of the Pyramids by François-Louis-Joseph Watteau (1799)
Two years later Napoleon oversaw the invasion of Egypt as part of an attempt to undermine British trade.
At the Battle of the Pyramids he led the French to a crushing victory over the Ottomans and Mamluks.