@KesterR@kolektiva.social Profile picture
May 6 16 tweets 3 min read Read on X
A highly deserved demise:
"these elections have only confirmed that the Conservatives are heading for the electoral equivalent of the Chicxulub asteroid impact (except this time one or two dinosaurs might survive)" conservativehome.com/2024/05/05/goo…
If the "Conservative" party (actually constitutionally destructive cynically amoral nihilists) is finished in the next 4-5 years and the LibDems take their place as the main right of centre party in the UK, that'd be a very good thing for the UK and its influence on the world.
We also need electoral system reform and a properly codified constitution. 'Codified' doesn't have to mean treating it like it's sacred and valuing it literally more than life. It can be continually updating and improving. But it should have stronger constraints on the executive.
And it should include making it constitutionally unlawful to get parliament's permission for an advisory referendum with an ordinary 50% majority standard and then to treat it as if it was a binding plebiscite and using a 3.78% margin to change something so fundamental as Brexit.
If it was up to me to draft the constitution, I'd start with article 1 of the German Basic Law and make it even more explicitly emphatic that state authority is secondary to the natural facts of inherent human dignity and universal human rights, and absolutely not vice versa.
I'd explicitly limit 'national interest' to be secondary and particular within the whole context of universal human rights and infinite responsibility in the sense defined by Levinas. I'd define the legal philosophical logical order between levels of law, incl the case of borders
Re. Borders - the human right to free movement should be generally the starting point. Restrictions on free movement should have to be justified reasonably in order to fairly balance different valid human rights claims, without discrimination by nationality or iow. coloniality.
Border procedures should be basically about time place and manner of crossing, not about keeping people who we've participated in impoverishing or forcibly displacing out. And even in cases where we haven't negatively contributed to people's motivations to leave their countries,
basically we shouldn't be restricting people's rights to free movement around the planet without a good reason for it. Public health protection by limiting epidemic spread is a valid reason for slowing down or checking people have made a reasonable effort to not infect others.
Stopping persecutors from following refugees is a valid reason for border checks. Triaging needs and resettlement and socio-economic integration capacity while the former are much larger than the latter is a fair reason, if we're also working on reducing that disproportion.
If we faced our fair share of responsibilities for politically militarily or economically* forcibly displaced people consequential on our foreign policies, we'd soon realise we need to be more responsible earlier to prevent more forcible displacements. (*See ICESCR 1966 art.2.1.)
Conserving fundamental constitutional and cultural principles which give a society cohesion and adaptive stability is a valid and genuine political priority. But the "Conservatives" we have now are actually devoted to doing the opposite.
A good way for a principled conservative successor party to start would be to focus on campaigning for and setting up well a civil constitutional commission to repair the damage done by Brexit & its associated political period and to prevent any such damages ever happening again.
Another constitutional issue we need to clarify is the relationship between macroeconomic and political hierarchies. The notion that capitalism and democracy are inherently congruent because both value 'freedom' is utterly insane.
It involves actively ignoring population structure (hierarchical clustering) and treating 'society' as if it were merely an aggregate of individuals, so that idealistic rhetoric about individual(istic) economic freedoms is magically assumed to scale up linearly and fit society.
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with @KesterR@kolektiva.social

@KesterR@kolektiva.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KesterRatcliff

May 3
I look forward to the day hopefully in my lifetime when the @Conservatives party will finally close down as an organisation and end. It has no beneficial part in any decent future for the UK. We have no need of lying, cruel, amoral, nihilistic politicians.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
@Conservatives They utterly and abysmally fail at Chesterton's Gate parable of principled conservatism - they are destroying constitutional foundations of liberal democracy (universal human rights, legal rationality) without even bothering to understand their purpose or what they were made for.
@Conservatives Being willing to say or do absolutely anything to chase engagement in the commercial consumeristic mediatized system, with no principles except selfish greed and manipulative use of inter-group hatreds to form a community with no positive identity, is not even 'conservative'.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 5
@civictechguide We might be looking at what 'civic' means from different perspectives. I don't necessarily assume it has to be directly connected to an already existing civil society org in the current system of institutions. I mean more that the structure of the thing is inherently apt for
@civictechguide supporting the kind of relationships which occur in 'civil society' and strengthening that kind of social network topologically in the whole multi- digital environment ('multi-platform') global social network (or network of networks), so that it grows strong enough
@civictechguide to constrain 'state' and 'market' networks in the process of digital globalisation, so that it goes down a more democratic range of trajectories into possible futures. And I mean primarily 'democratic' universal values, not necessarily the particular Western form of institutions.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 28
@Cabooner @KlDGUDl Re. 21) I don't see a big moral problem with targeting Iranian or Assad regime military targets in Syria, altho I get it why it's incl in the list. What's worse about their influence in Syria is that the US gov chose to actively intervene *against* the Syrian revolution
@Cabooner @KlDGUDl partly because the Israeli gov believes that having the Assad regime as a neighbour is less risky for them than having an Arab-majority democratic government as a neighbour on that border would be. So the USG blocked the FSA receiving any potentially adequate air defense weapons,
@Cabooner @KlDGUDl which would have prevented most of the mass atrocities and mass forced displacement by the Assad regime and its Iranian and Russian regime patrons, and would've enabled the religiously moderate Sunni majority pro-democratic FSA and civil orgs to win + succeed as a transition gov.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 26
now I've thought of it it seems so obvious I can't unsee it: the link between populist authoritarianism and strategic xenophobia is that the obsessive xenophobia is instrumental in a strategy to shift a society's moral system to authoritarianism, because in authoritarian morality
the locus of moral comparison is 'up' the hierarchy, judgement is primarily relative to authorities, 'morality' condescends from an authority's 'right' to be arbitrary, which at the top is absolute, and that establishes the whole system of arbitrary hierarchical power relations.
Conversely, in the Preferential Option for the Poor moral orientation, the locus of moral comparison is 'down' in the worldly hierarchy, primarily relative to the poor and oppressed, judgement takes their perspective (Matthew 25:31-46), and the whole moral system is 'bottom up'.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 21
Thought while biking yesterday: one way AI Doomerism deludes us is by omitting, or overwhelming with noise, info about the range of what's possible, leading to a design monopoly on a v narrow range of what AI could be. To judge what should be, first we need to know what could be.
A necessary part of ethical analysis of current big commercial AI developments is comparing them to what we can realistically enough imagine AI could, be in a range of possible & desirable futures, & therefore how, then how much, they're falling short relative to that higher good
Without a perspective on what's possible alternatively to do with the resources now going into powering a very narrow range of similar designs, mainly aimed at producing already predictable content, we can't really evaluate whether using those resources that way is the best use.
Read 34 tweets
Mar 16
the #RefugeesWelcome volunteers movement in 2016 was 3x bigger in number of citizens than the populist-nationalists, but the European Commission chose to go with the pop-nats' demands and has doubled-down on that ever since, under @vonderleyen, ignoring @Europarl_EN @EP_Justice
@vonderleyen is up for re-election this year, probably in July. If everything goes as normal, she'll be re-elected smoothly.

She's made the EU's border violence regime much worse & expanded the policy of commissioning extraterritorial refoulement services
We're not likely to get another candidate elected - that would require finding enough leverage to change the European Council's established preference for a Neoliberal ideologue who performs the style they expect and continues treating the European Parliament as merely ornamental
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(