“In military terms, the SCALP is a real game changer.”
“Operation Chrysalis : how France is organising the supply of SCALP missiles to Ukraine.”
@RFI reveals the 🇲🇫 method for supplying the 🇺🇦 armed forces with SCALP cruise missiles without touching its own strategic stocks.
🧵
France has identified several batches of SCALP-EG cruise missiles stored in “cocoons” in its arsenals. A cocoon is a waterproof package used to protect and preserve equipment with a view to a possible return to service.
Two types of stockpile emerged: old missiles that had reached the end of their life but were intact.
On the other hand, cocoons containing missiles that were no longer used because they had been cannibalised: that is, a certain number of parts or components had been removed in order to keep others in working order. SCALPs used in @Armee_de_lair squadrons.
They must, therefore, return to the factories where they were assembled in France. More precisely, in Bourges, on one of the @MBDAGroup industrial sites where these machines were produced in the 2000s.
The plan is to upgrade the equipment over a three-month period, during which each missile will undergo a battery of tests. A simplified procedure, because 🇲🇫 is sure that SCALPs sent to 🇺🇦 will not be returned to storage but will be launched against 🇷🇺 targets within weeks.
In addition to “Chrysalide”, which must be completed by the end of the year, the 🇲🇫 authorities are also looking elsewhere. They are looking for all types of ammunition: SCALPs, but also 155 mm shells for artillery and surface-to-air weapons to defend the Ukrainian skies.
There are also “export” versions of SCALP-EG missiles, and again, the main idea is to ensure that those that reach the end of their life, or that could be sold, are used by Ukraine. This idea has been circulating since the beginning of the year.
Some customers in the 🇲🇫 defence industry have ordered large quantities of the SCALPs in a slightly different version to that fitted to 🇲🇫 squadrons. ⤵️
However, a source close to the manufacturer told @RFI that these versions can not be programmed using 🇲🇫 computers. These missiles will, therefore, have to be adapted to be compatible with the mission preparation system provided by the @Elysee.
Discretion is required on this sensitive issue, but it’s likely that these “export” missiles, if sold, will undergo some modifications on the assembly lines to make them usable by 🇺🇦. The scope of these SCALPs “exports” is somewhat smaller, and some software is different.
The first units were delivered to Ukraine in the second half of 2023. In August, @ZelenskyyUa inaugurated a SCALP-EG cruise missile by writing “Glory to Ukraine” on the sides of the weapon.
The first shot targeted a 🇷🇺 command centre in the Luhansk oblast, which until then had been out of range of the Ukrainian arsenal. But it was the SCALPs, with “a range of 300 kilometres”, that were the architects of the victory in the Black Sea.
On 12 September, a large-scale missile attack destroyed two ships dry-docked in the port of Sevastopol, a large landing ship and a Kilo-class submarine, the Rostov on Don.
On 22 September 2023, a salvo of missiles penetrated 🇷🇺 surface-to-air defences and struck the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet, again at the Sevastopol naval base, injuring and killing senior officers.
On 4 November 2023, the Kerch shipyard suffered a massive attack by around ten missiles, damaging a 🇷🇺 warship armed with Kalibr cruise missiles.
SCALP-EG cruise missiles helped push the 🇷🇺 fleet back to the easternmost part of the Black Sea. A victory that allowed 🇺🇦 to protect the port of Odessa and secure a naval corridor along its coasts, allowing the export of grain.
“I assume to have reintroduced strategic ambiguity. To what end ? We’re faced with a power that is unrestrained, that has attacked [Ukraine] and no longer wants to tell us what its limits are. Why should we tell ourselves every morning what our strategic limits are ? When we say that Ukraine is the condition of our security ? Do we have limits ? No.” — @EmmanuelMacron
🧵
“Recent events have highlighted the importance of missile defence and deep-strike capabilities, which are essential for strategic signalling and escalation management in the face of uninhibited adversaries.”
“🇪🇺 must be able to defend what it holds dear, with its allies and, if necessary, alone.
Do we need an anti-missile shield for that? Perhaps. Do we need to increase our defence capabilities? Undoubtedly. Will that be enough against Russian missiles? We need to work on that.”
“We were told that they [shells] can be obtained, but in what condition are they, and are they suitable for use at all ? All this needs to be checked.”
Quantity is a necessity, but quality (and de facto safety) should not be neglected.
“We were given ammunition limited to a range of 7 km and in too small a quantity. With these shells, we are forced to come within 3 km of the Russians to hit them, and at this distance, they will attack us with kamikaze drones before we have sent the first shell.”
“Who would have predicted that Ukraine would resist so well and that the Kremlin’s ‘special operation’ would be a failure? Let’s not forget that the Russian soldiers who entered Ukraine from Belarus were carrying their parade uniforms. They planned to march on Kyiv a few days later.” — Jean-Yves Le Drian, former Minister of the Armed Forces
🧵
“[The Russian failure is due to several errors of judgement on Putin’s part. First, an underestimation of Ukrainian resistance and the strength of national feeling in that country. Then an underestimation of the unity of the Europeans, which has never been denied in action.”
“Putin failed to see that the invasion of Ukraine would bring NATO, and within NATO the United States, back into the game. Ultimately, Putin overestimated the strength of his army.”
“What [Macron] wants is for Ukraine not to find itself alone with one or two partners; he wants a coalition around Ukraine.”
🧵
“Then, in the field of training, it’s no secret that there have been training missions, for artillery, as well as for armor, defense systems, F16s and combat aircraft training.”
“But Emmanuel [Macron] knows very well that when we send our soldiers out for training, when they come back, they also have to adapt to the Ukrainian environment and continue their training there.”
“In total, France has supplied military equipment worth €2.615 billion to Ukraine, to which must be added €1.2 billion donated to the European Peace Facility (EPF), i.e. more than €3.8 billion in support between 24 February 2022 and 31 December 2023.”
🧵
“This financial effort is accompanied by a determined training effort, with nearly 10 000 Ukrainian soldiers already trained by the armies of Poland and France.”
In 2023, @NexterKNDS, @NOVADEM and @MBDAFrance were selected by the Directorate General of Armament (@DGA) to develop the “COLIBRI” remote-controlled munition. The first demonstrations of these remote-controlled munitions were planned for the end of 2023.
COLIBRI is an active operating load solution using a contact drone. MBDA and Novadem’s solution is based on a rotorcraft. Nexter’s solution consists of “adapting a fixed-wing surveillance drone” better suited to “open and possibly larger” environments. (@OpexNews)
On the sidelines of the launch of the Artillery Coalition, @SebLecornu hinted that the first French-made kamikaze drones may be supplied to Ukraine. And this, even before the French Armed Forces acquired them in 2026.