The Luxembourg court has ruled that Jeff Dieschburg infringed upon my copyright when he used my work without consent.
Using a different medium was irrelevant. My work being 'available online' was irrelevant. Consent was necessary. 1/
This win means a lot—not just for me but also for artists & photographers everywhere.
It’s a reminder that copyright protects individuals from those that try to profit off our work without consent.
It reaffirms that our work being online doesn't mean we give up our rights. 3/
For 2 years I’ve been harassed for fighting this because of my gender, my race, my being a photographer.
My home address was doxxed, I was told they'd put me in jail, that I’d kill myself soon. I lost out on work cuz of how it ate away at me. But I didn't want to give up. 4/
I couldn’t give up because it’s one of my longest held wishes to experience justice once, in this life.
Maybe it's a stupid ideal, but I think if we can, we should stand up to bullies who believe they can get away with anything because they know people can't fight back. 5/
So this is for the young me who couldn’t fight for herself, & for everyone else who's felt the same, that they couldn't challenge what seemed terrifying, powerful, and unjust. 6/
I know that as individuals, it may not seem like there's much we can do. But even if we are alone, the act of many individuals fighting for what's right, over time, may one day be collectively enough to make a difference in this world. 7/
Next time you see someone do this to another artist and claim that:
- "using a different medium is transformative and not copyright infringement", or
- "this was found on the internet so it's free to use!"
I want to thank Luxembourg & its judicial system for upholding copyright protection for an individual, esp in time of AI where our rights seem to be quickly eroding.
And to my lawyer Vincent Wellens & co at NautaDutilh—thank you for fighting to protect the rights of artists. 9/
I’m grateful for the incredible kindness of the people of Luxembourg and everyone around the world. Your help and support meant a lot when my world was breaking apart. 10/
I hope that more of the world will look towards Luxembourg & remember that copyright is what allows individual like myself to work as an artist.
Because without knowing that I can own what I create & make a living off it—I could never have chosen this path for my life. 11/
It's hard to find the right words after 2 years of suppressing what I can say or share. And I'm still processing the fact that I can finally start to have my life back now.
I hope bit by bit, I can return to how much I used to create & share. Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
8 years ago, Google Deepmind created AlphaGo—an AI that defeated the best human Go player in the world & it shaped how I see art & AI.
In a new interview, Lee Sedol says he wouldn't become a pro again if he had known of AI today. This is heartbreaking— 1/ blog.google/around-the-glo…
Go has always been the most beautiful game to me. The sound of a stone on board, the simplicity of its rules and design. A person's playstyle is an expression of themselves—like seeing an artist's style in a painting—it's personal and meaningful. 2/
Today, no human player has a chance of defeating any of the top AI Go programs. AI is used religiously in professional training, and like it or not, our relationship with Go as an art form has been changed forever. 3/
As someone who knows what it means to be talented, let me tell you a story:
I was born in the Beijing shooting range, grew up with Olympians, and picked up air rifle after moving to Singapore. Within a few months, I hit the Olympic finals cutoff with no full-time training. 1/
Good design is what will land you the job. Not godly rendering, and certainly not the average of regurgitated designs from Cyberpunk, Alien, or Final Fantasy.
For concept art, people want to see thoughtful research with execution. 2/
Want to design a dress?
Do: art museums, history books, pics of clothing on real bodies & runway + unexpected elements
Don’t: moodboard of only video games/film screenshots
Regurgitating diluted design is obvious, & ADs can sniff out boring designers a mile away. 3/
Indies using AI will impact more jobs than you think. Let’s discuss 3 scenarios:
In illustration, many junior-mid lvl artists make a living freelancing w/ indie authors, publishers, tabletop games, musicians. The pay is limited, but it’s a living. And AI is taking that away: 1/
To simplify, say a picture book pays $100/page x 12pgs. Artist takes 3 days per page, project takes 1.5-2mths. They earn $1.2k & pay some rent. If all indie author/creator decide to generate images, gigs dry up. Tens of thousands of artists in this market go out of work. 2/
You might say, then get new job training for these tens of thousands of ppl—ok, sure, but these aren’t the only people affected.
Let’s look at scenario 2, where even more people are impacted in a project that gets automated—photography. 3/
Gen AI will remove jobs at a higher rate than it can create. One of few ways forward is for gvnts to tax those that use AI. So if much of workforce is eliminated, there can be social support for most of society who’ll have no jobs. If not taxed, AI only benefit corporations. 1/
Eroding the protection of hiring people is often the first step. I was at an event recently where someone is developing AI to replace a job protected by trade org or union (not my field, so not 100% sure), and they’re counting on government to soften regulations with lobbying. 2/
The plan is that company will sell AI as tool to assist users, train an AI based on how users carry out their jobs in negotiating & what they look for, and “When regulations are AI-friendly in a few years, and the AI is well trained, we can eliminate this job from existence.” 3/