Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
May 10, 2024 57 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Good morning from New York.

Stormy Daniels finished her testimony. Karen McDougal's off the witness list, and on Thursday, trial proceedings wrapped with Madeleine Westerhout still on the stand.

I'm inside the courtroom, today and every day, picking up where we left off. 🧵
Explanation on McDougal, for those who missed the end of proceedings yesterday:

Without explanation, Trump's lead attorney Todd Blanche said prosecutors informed him they won't be calling her. The payoff to McDougal isn't directly tied to the 34 falsifying records charges.
Trump enters the courtroom, flanked by his lawyers.
"All rise."

Justice Merchan walks to the bench, and the attorneys register their appearances.
Per the press pool

Trump "[i]gnored questions about whether he would accept Stormy's challenge to testify," at the morning press conference.

Later: "'If I put one wrong word in, they're gonna put me on jail,' he said, while trying to read from Byron York column.
Trump, per the pool: "I'll go now sit in that freezing courtroom for 8 or 9 hours and think about being on the campaign all day."

Honestly, during the first days of trial, Trump had a point on the temperature.

Now? Not so much.
The parties immediately have a lengthy sidebar conference.
As the sidebar ends, Justice Merchan prompts: "Okay, let's get the witness, please."

Westerhout re-enters.
"All rise."

The jury is entering.
Trump's attorney Susan Necheles resumes her cross:

Westerhout speaks about her work with the RNC during Trump's campaign, and she agrees with Necheles' characterization that Trump and the party worked together as "one unit."
This was after Trump became the party's nominee.
On Thursday, Westerhout said the RNC considered plans to replace Trump after the "Access Hollywood" tape landed.

"It's my recollection that there were conversations about how to, if it was needed, how it would be possible to replace him as the candidate if it came to that."
It seemed that cross-examination was headed toward mitigating the blow of that testimony, but Necheles quickly pivoted to another subject following her questions about the RNC.
Prosecutors object to the admission of a piece of evidence, but it's unclear what it is.

They ask for a sidebar. They get one, and the parties huddle.
We're back.

Necheles shows Westerhout a travel schedule for Trump.
Prosecutors are fighting the admission of the travel schedules.

Westerhout says she didn't receive them, and asked whether she remembered the one she was shown, she said only since her lawyer showed it to her this morning. Not contemporaneously.

ADA Mangold: "We object."
Another sidebar follows.
Merchan, after the sidebar conference:

"Your motion to introduce this evidence is denied."
Q: Wasn't that a problem, getting mail to President Trump to the White House?
A: Yes.
Westerhout agrees with Trump's lawyer that the system of FedEx-ing checks to the former president's bodyguard Keith Schiller was a way to facilitate deliveries promptly.

It was a "workaround," Necheles says.

Westerhout agrees.
Asked whether other administrations used this workaround, Westerhout says she doesn't personally know, but she can't imagine it'd be any different.
Service advisory: Wi-Fi down.
Toward the end of Westerhout's testimony, Trump's attorney asked a series of questions prompting her to say that the former president worried about the effect the Stormy Daniels story would have on his family.

It had a mixed result.
Westerhout duly agreed the matter upset Trump "because he knew it would be hurtful to his family" — but she also said he never told her that.

"I don’t think he specifically said that, but I could understand that the whole situation was very unpleasant," she said.
The second part of that answer was stricken following the prosecution's objection.
On redirect, Assistant DA Rebecca Mangold pushed back against the defense's claim that the FedEx-ed checks to Trump bodyguard Keith Schiller were simply a workaround for the slow process of White House mail.

The other benefit of system: Skipping the typical screening process.
Asked if the system would have that effect, Westerhout replied: "That’s right."

The prosecutor also elicited another detail about Westerhout's ongoing loyalty to Trump. She works for American Global Strategies, as Chief of Staff to the Chairman, Amb. Robert O’Brien.
O'Brien is a former National Security Advisor for Trump.
On recross, Necheles ended with the image of Trump as a family man.

Q: Just to reiterate: President Trump was very close to his family, right?
A: Yes.
Up now for the prosecution:

— Daniel Dixon, another custodial witness who works as a compliance analyst AT&T

We're starting to see phone records.
Why are phone records important to this case? It's been clear since the case has been charged.

On Oct. 26, 2016, Michael Cohen opened his shell company to funnel a $130,000 home equity loan to Stormy Daniels' lawyer — "shortly after speaking on the phone" with Trump. On or about October 26, shortly after speaking with the Defendant on the phone, Lawyer A opened a bank account in Manhattan in the name of Essential Consultants LLC, a new shell company he had created to effectuate the payment. He then transferred $131,000 from his personal home equity line of credit (“HELOC”) into that account. On or about October 27, Lawyer A wired $130,000 from his Essential Consultants LLC account in New York to Lawyer B to suppress Woman 2’s account.
From the exhibits, it's clear that the phone records have Cohen's name, but it's not immediately clear it's the same call.

We'll wait for the release of today's exhibits later.
On cross, Trump's lawyer Emil Bove presses the witness on alternative explanations for the records.

Q: You're familiar with the concept of a pocket dial, right?
A: Correct.

Q: There's a lot of data here, but the data has limits, right?
The witness says they are logs.
The witness ends his testimony.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg makes a rare entrance into the courtroom.
The next witness: Jennie Tomalin, at Verizon.

More phone records.
Morning recess.
Wi-Fi and backup appear to be down.

Expect delays.

The internet appears to be ready for the weekend.
The People recall the DA's paralegal to introduce more Trump social media posts.
Trump's tweets denigrating Maggie Haberman and Michael Cohen are entered into evidence — also a tweet about Cohen suggesting that he won't flip.
Texts between Stormy Daniels' manager Gina Rodriguez and the Enquirer's then-editor in chief Dylan Howard.

On Oct. 25, 2016, they seemed to be angry that Daniels hadn't been paid.

Howard: "I'm not going to burn my lifelong contacts for these fuckers." Image
On Oct. 26, 2016, Cohen opened up the bank account for his shell company used to obtain a $130,000 home equity loan to wire to Daniels' then-lawyer Keith Davidson.

"Good news I heard," Howard wrote that day. Image
The last witness of the week: Jarden Jarmel-Schneider, another paralegal for the DA's office.

He's been called to submit a chart illustrating what the phone records show.
Once released, this will be an important exhibit.
Trump's lawyer Emil Bove cross-examines the witness, asking whether the rather painstaking work of putting vast reams of data together was tedious.

"Honestly, I kind of enjoyed it," the witness says, to laughter.

Bove: "I hear that. Respect." (laughter)
That does it for another week of witness testimony in Trump's criminal trial.
Assistant DA Joshua Steinglass says he plans to call two more witnesses:

"I think it's entirely possible that we will rest by the end of next week."
Trump's attorney Emil Bove notes that one of them isn't Allen Weisselberg, whose "absence" from this trial raises a "very complicated" question.
Bove wants to keep out their separation agreement as prejudicial hearsay.

Prosecutor Christopher Conroy says it's needed to show: "Mr. Weisselberg’s interests here are very aligned with the defendant’s."
During closing arguments, Conroy says, the defense is likely going to raise questions about Weisselberg's absence.

The prosecutor says the agreement explains his absence.
Bove says Weisselberg is absent "because the DA's office initiated perjury prosecution in the leadup to this case."

"It's just a rabbit hole that I think is unnecessary," he says.
Judge notes, without saying it this way, that there's no reason an incarcerated witness can't testify.

"Has anyone attempted to get him to come in, by serving him with a subpoena or some other way?" he asked.

Neither side has.
Bove points out the defense has no burden, and he resists some sort of negotiated stipulation informing jurors that Weisselberg is in jail for perjury.

The prosecutor resists subpoenaing him and putting him up there "cold," in light of his restrictive Trump Org agreement.
More on Weisselberg's restrictive $2M severance agreement, which came out during Trump's civil fraud trial. authory.com/AdamKlasfeld/T…
One last item of business:

Trump's lead attorney Todd Blanche alerts the court that Michael Cohen is TikTok-ing about Trump.

"He's stated on social media that he is going to stop talking, and he doesn't."

Blanche wants the government to order Cohen to stop.
ADA Josh Steinglass says he's "repeatedly, repeatedly" asked the witnesses not to do this.

"The fact is, the witnesses are not subject to the gag order," and prosecutors cannot control them.
Justice Merchan:

"I would direct the People to inform Mr. Cohen that the judge is asking him" to refrain from making public statements about Trump — and that "comes from the bench."
With that, have a nice weekend — and kick it off by watching my analysis of today's Trump trial proceedings on @TheLastWord tonight at 10 p.m. ET.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

May 21
This isn’t a legal document.

It’s a PR document that in parts contradicts how the legal document reveals how the fund will actually operate.

Some examples 🧵⬇️
PR Document: "There is no partisan restriction."

Here's how the plainly partisan way in which the legal document defines the "representative" conduct. Image
PR Document: Trump, his family and the Trump Organization won't receive any monetary compensation or damages from it.

Half-true, but there's a big asterisk: "Claimants can include entities," which is why sources told ABC News that Trump's entities could apply. Image
Read 13 tweets
May 20
The “confidential investigation documents” that Patel evasively alludes to is Volume II of the Jack Smith report, per the indictment.

It’s the only special counsel final report in US history that’s not been publicly released, as a result of Judge Cannon’s order at Trump’s urging.Image
Lineberger's case was filed in the Southern District of Florida's Fort Pierce division, virtually guaranteeing a favorable judicial assignment for Trump DOJ.

Instead of Cannon, the case goes to newly minted Judge Ed Artau, who has this tangled history. politico.com/news/2025/06/2…
Read 5 tweets
May 6
Trump DOJ opposes the release of SPLC grand jury transcripts, but what the memo *doesn't* say speaks volumes. Feds don't dispute the SPLC's account of the Trump admin's "gross misrepresentations" about the informant program.

Instead, the US Attorney says that's "not relevant."

Why that matters.🧵Moreover, the public comments in question—whether the SPLC ever shared information obtained by its field sources with law enforcement—are simply not relevant to the charges in the indictment. This case is about fraudulently obtaining money from donors, lying to banks, and concealing payments to the same organizations the SPLC publicly told donors they were fighting against. (Doc. 1 at 3–6). What, if anything, the SPLC did with the information it obtained through field sources is not relevant to the charges.
The SPLC's motion seeking the grand jury records rattled off a series of "false statements" by Trump and his surrogates about Charlottesville and the informants program.

The group said info gathered there thwarted a terrorist attack and led to arrests. allrisenews.com/p/splc-tipped-…
Debunking Trump's revisionist history of Charlottesville, SPLC said it handed the FBI a 45-page “Event Alert” with informant-gathered information.

The dossier tipped off agents about the names, photos, criminal histories and "weapons of choice of the people there."
Read 6 tweets
Apr 23
By the DOJ's own account, the SPLC's informant program was cheap and effective.

For a fraction of a *percentage* of their annual budget, SPLC penetrated the nation's worst hate groups and published their secrets with info from their turncoats.

The DOJ's case assumes donors felt defrauded by this. buff.ly/cwTnYg6
The Trump DOJ alleges that the SPLC spent about $3 million on informants over the course of a *decade.*

Check out of the SPLC's revenue and expenditures from 2024, the last fiscal year records were public. That's a typical year, and it's a drop in the bucket. projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
In return, SPLC infiltrated the KKK, the neo-Nazis, and other extremist groups, and they shared their secrets with federal law enforcement until Kash Patel put an end to that last October.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14
Two Trump appointees on the D.C. Circuit panel blocked Boasberg from even INVESTIGATING contempt of court related to the March 2025 flights to El Salvador.

The dissent: "Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands."

Opinions buff.ly/4kr3ALC"Contempt of court is a public offense, and the fate of our democratic republic will depend on whether we treat it as such. In the many forms in which it can be committed, contempt degrades the power that the People, through their Constitution and Congress, gave the federal courts. Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands. For contempt offends not only the authority of whichever judge has been subjected to such incursions, but it also offends our system of governance. Addressing contempt is, therefore, a responsibility that is...
This is the second time Judges Rao and Walker granted a writ of mandamus, an "extraordinary" rebuke of a lower court judge.

But Walker went out of the way to praise Boasberg, saying he was in a tough spot even as Walker overruled him. The district court needed to make a quick decision. The facts on the ground were changing, jurisdiction was unclear, and the merits depended on the meaning of a statute from the 1700s that hadn’t been invoked in the past 75 years.6 I do not envy the position of any judge facing such time pressure to make hard and high-stakes legal decisions. Fortunately, the trial judge assigned to this case had more than two decades of judicial experience, with a widely respected record of dispassionate decisionmaking.
The nuance here will be important to note in light of the Trump DOJ's campaign to vilify Boasberg, whose D.C. Circuit peers largely stood up for him even when his rulings didn't hold.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10
A hearing over Anthropic's lawsuit against the Pentagon is underway: The AI giant's lawyer Michael Mongan asks for a hearing as early as Friday.

“There really are irreparable injuries that are concrete and are mounting every day.”

Judge Lin appears skeptical about moving too quickly.
Trump's government has been "affirmatively reaching out to [Anthropic's] customers" and urging them not to work with the company, per Mongan.
DOJ Attorney James Harlow pushes for a March 18
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(