Yesterday, media reported on four students who testified to a HoC committee on "antisemitism and Jewish safety", saying Jewish students are "terrified" and "don't feel safe."
They failed to mention three of them hold or previously held positions in pro-Israel advocacy orgs...🧵
Nati Pressmann was a Campus Fellow for the pro-Israel media advocacy org @HonestRepCanada. She testified as founder of the "Canadian Union of Jewish Students,"
which only launched a week ago. That org doesn't have a website but its launch was profiled by @nationalpost.
Michael Eshayek is VP External Affairs of Concordia's StartUpNation, which promotes Israel as a tech hub. In March, they co-hosted an event that invited IDF reservists to talk about the "fight against the delegitimization of Israel." They're on Insta: instagram.com/thestartupnati…
Nicole Nashen was the president of Hillel Concordia from 2021-22. Hillel seems to be housed within Federation CJA and works with CIJA (Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs), both pro-Israel orgs. Nashen's testimony called out "anti-Israel activists" and pro-Palestine encampments.
Rachel Cook is the only student who who does not appear to have pro-Israel org affiliations. She previously said of the University of Alberta that “antisemitism and anti-Israel bias are institutional here.” jns.org/jewish-law-stu…
Two non-students also spoke to the committee. Yosh Tashish works for Hillel Ontario. His bio on Israel Policy Forum's website says "he currently serves as the lead professional for Queen’s University Hillel in Kingston, ON." Hillel Ontario does pro-Israel advocacy.
The other was was Neil G. Oberman, the lawyer who unsuccessfully sought an injunction on behalf of two McGill students to get the pro-Palestine encampment there cleared by police. cbc.ca/news/canada/mo…
Oberman also represented two unnamed students in taking legal action against McGill after a protest there in Feb. thesuburban.com/news/city_news…
Several other students spoke at a press conference outside. Three are mentioned in @StephTaylorCP's article (which I think incorrectly states that six students spoke on Parliament Hill - it was four in committee and then seven or more at the presser). ctvnews.ca/canada/jewish-…
All three additional students mentioned in that article work / worked for / held positions in pro-Israel organizations. That also isn't mentioned in the article.
Sydney Greenspoon: StandWithUs Emerson Fellow (current)
Anastasia Zorchinsky: president of StartUpNation (current)
Claire Frankel: Hillel McGill, Chai fellowship, Hasbara fellowship, Honest Reporting Canada Media fellowship, CJPAC (mix of past and current)
Of the MPs on the committee, several have been lobbied extensively by CIJA (Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs):
As far as I can tell, there were no anti-Zionist Jews who spoke at the antisemitism committee nor at the press conference afterwards. I haven't seen any quoted in the media reports about the committee either.
In the top news results about the committee hearing and press conference, reports only refer to "Jewish students" and did not specify how many were or had been involved in pro-Israel advocacy groups (at least six of seven students).
It's a media failure that the reporting depicted those who spoke at this committee as the authority on Jewish student experience, didn't note their org affiliations, and didn't mention or quote the many Jewish students participating in the pro-Palestine campus encampments.
Correction: Rachel Cook also recently worked for a pro-Israel advocacy org, as chief of staff to Reut USA's president in 2022-23. So that's 4/4 students who were on the committee and 7/7 when including those at the press conference.
Remember those 2021 arrests in Toronto around the Lamport encampment eviction & after, when cops put out "wanted" photos? Here's a thread 🧵 on what happened since.
Might be relevant to the wave of 15-ish arrests in Toronto this month related to Palestinian solidarity actions.
Long story short: despite all the arrests (at least 34) related to the Lamport Stadium eviction and the protests after at 14 Division and at a later press conference against police repression, there were no convictions. Just a lot of withdrawn charges and absolute discharges.
There were three categories of arrests:
1. The 25 people who received trespass tickets at the Lamport Stadium eviction. Those were all withdrawn earlier this year after the Crown tried to pursue them unsuccessfully for two years. They didn't try the charges at trial.
If you're wondering what CIJA (Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs) is and how it was formed, here is a little summary and some articles with more info...
CIJA, founded around 2004, was not always the most prominent org claiming to represent Jewish interests in Canada.
The Canadian Jewish Congress, founded in 1919, long held that position, had internal elections, and rigorous debates on policy positions. It was a Zionist org.
In 2002, Netanyahu visited Concordia U and a riot broke out.
Opinions of the Canadian public and government were shifting against Israel, and in recognition of Palestinians' plight.
Heather Reisman (Indigo) and husband Jerry Schwartz (Onex) felt something needed to be done.
I was curious, why would people call for a boycott of Cafe Landwer? Is it about the political actions of the business (e.g. is it a Zionist business, as protesters said on Saturday), or is was it targeted simply for being Jewish-owned? Here's what I found.
In 2015, Israel-based Cafe Landwer built a cafe in Jerusalem on top of a historic Islamic cemetery, part of a development that destroyed the cemetery where contemporaries of Muhammed may lie.
In 2008 and 2009, the company which owns Cafe Landwer, Federman & Sons, was a "Cooperating Organization" with the Herzliya Conference, an Israeli national security conference that the Israeli government is heavily involved in. I don't see record of involvement since.
Please stop taking Trudeau's "cap on oil and gas sector emissions" as serious climate action. The cap is:
- three decades away
- won't necessarily limit oil and gas production
- doesn't apply to most emissions in the product lifecycle
Thread. 1/7
Crucially, the cap has no targets yet until 2050. This suits the o&g industry fine as no immediate action is needed.
And long-term there are two crucial problems.
First, "net zero" allows for ongoing emissions as long they are "offset" by a dubious suite of mechanisms. 2/7
This includes emissions trading, which can displace Indigenous peoples from their lands to make room for fast-growing tree monocrops which may not actually sequester emissions long-term. It also can look like pumping greenhouse gases underground to get more oil and gas out. 3/7
Seeing @WEMovement contracted by the Canadian government to deliver $900 million in programs reminds me: this organization denied me media access on six occasions to #WEday events to report for @briarpatchmag, including the most recent one in MTL with Sophie Trudeau. 1/
@WEMovement said this was because of "overwhelming" applications. But there was little media coverage of these #WEday events, and even less indie coverage. Places like @TheTyee and until-recently-indie @nowtoronto & @georgiastraight haven't reported from #WEday in years. 2/