L0la L33tz Profile picture
May 14 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The entire Tornado Cash verdict is completely insane and will turn the legality of building any privacy service on its head.🧵

1.Open-source devs building non-custodial tools can be held responsible for criminal activity when crim. actors cannot be stopped or deanonymized👇Image
2. TC cannot be classified as a communications service despite the fact that that's exactly what TC is: a tool to communicate transactions between users. It does not matter whether TC took custody of funds. 👇
Image
Image
3. Building an unstoppable privacy system is laid out to suggest criminal intent.👇 Image
4. TC dev was aware of money laundering activity in TC, laid out as intentional participation in the act. 👇
Image
Image
5. Devs are fully responsible when their open source code is used for criminal activity through the development of source code and UIs. 👇 Image
As predicted, the verdict references FATF, which has no regulatory powers and operates with zero democratic oversight. therage.co/meet-fatf-the-…
Image
The assumption that "criminal intent lies with the individuals and not the tools they use" seems void with the TC verdict. This verdict is a full on declaration of war against privacy service in existence. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with L0la L33tz

L0la L33tz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @L0laL33tz

Oct 31, 2022
1/13 In honor of Bitcoin White Paper day, here’s a thread on things that work differently in Bitcoin today than they were outlined 14 years ago 🧵👇🏽
2/13 “Nodes always consider the longest chain to be the correct one and will keep working on extending it.” Image
3/13 Instead of the longest chain, nodes follow the chain with the most work. This is due to the risk of timewarp attacks, in which malicious actors can generate a longer chain with less work by manipulating MedianTimePast, reducing difficulty. bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/7583…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(