So yesterday we had quite the victory at Uni Lausanne for both the Palestinian rights student movement, and for the university as a whole against political violence & silencing pressure. No time to detail the whole thing, will just add links. 1/ Image: Keystone/Valentin Flauraud
The students won concessions on all 4 of their demands: 1. public university statement of solidarity with Palestinian academics and scholars 2. active support of Palestinian scholars and rebuilding Palestinian academia 3. transparency on collaborations with Israel 2/
The fourth and most contentious was the calling into question and possible boycott of collaborations with Israel. The partial concession here is the creation of an urgent working group (students were not thrilled, but still) setting out criteria for ethical collaboration.
3/
These would apply to all collaborations, not just with Israel. Privately, uni leadership thinks this is a good thing. Honestly quite proud of our uni leadership and rectorate, they negotiated in good faith while under IMMENSE political & media pressure to resort to violence.
4/
Pressure which almost every other uni leadership immediately caved under, or enthusiastically embraced. Looking at you EPFL, ETHZ, Geneva, Basel, etc.
5/
The Uni Lausanne students compiled a detailed, referenced report, detailing links between Israeli institutions the university collaborates with, and the Israeli military. It is HUGE. A+++ all around, our students are the best. In French. 6/ drive.google.com/file/d/14WeJR7…
Link to yesterday's press conference. The constrast between our university, functioning as an autonomous decision-making deliberative body, and the testimonies from students of other Swiss unis facing huge violence could not be starker. 7/
The political & media pressure is horrendous. The politicians did everything we are usually accused of: they seeked to impose their political line on the university, they seeked to bring violence onto the campus, they used media appearances to inflame the situation ...
8/
... and cynically raise their profile and advance their careers. I am deeply ashamed of them, as well as of most of the media, who did zero investigating, and just repeated harmful talking points. Let the record show our students did the work & the research. 👏👏👏
9/
The occupation ends, our building will be a sadder and emptier place today, but a huge movement was forged. This saturday, there will be a cross-university demonstration in Bern at 1pm. See you there.
Free Palestine!
End/
Image: @Lorikhysenii
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Should have seen this coming, but apparently my building is the first student-occupied pro-Palestinian Uni building in Switzerland. Super proud and going to prepare my courses in a slightly noisier environment than anticipated. 😍😍😍
not sharing pictures because, but right now everything very peaceful, people becoming friends, just sitting, working, talking. Some lucky folks moved a couch in, sitting pretty.
Ah was for colleague with crutches.
communique from students, translated into English:
"A peaceful occupation of Geopolis has just begun to demand:
- Immediate cessation of academic collaborations with Israeli institutions as long as Israel does not respect the immediate ceasefire, international law ....
Some recent pro-Palestinian tweets went viral, so I got to be exposed to pro-Israeli accounts, some real people, some trolls. And they exhibit behaviour I remember from the good (not good) days of Holocaust denial in Europe in the 1980s. A short 🧵 which will please no one.
1/
The "argument" has four phases.
1⃣ Denial. The bad stuff didn't happen, isn't credible, isn't plausible, wasn't that bad really.
2⃣ Justice. But, if it did happen, the victims had it coming to them. They were the bad guys, they did bad things, they deserved it for sure.
2/
3⃣ Outrage & glee. In fact, the bad guys are SO bad, they deserve WAY more than they got. We have been too restrained. We should be congratulated for the harm we did so far!
4⃣ Escalation. We need to be way more violent and attack more of them, kill more of them.
3/
The Columbia student activists are NOT targeting Jewish students FFS. THEY ARE ALSO JEWISH STUDENTS. The White House lies and lies and lies, here putting non-violent students futures, health and lives at risk. The biggest megaphone in the USA just called them violent antisemites.
They lied about Palestinians lives, diminishing them and calling them all violent terrorists, enabling their elimination. As predicted, they are now using the same rhetorical tactics to justify the elimination of undesirables at home. And all for their own violent Islamophobia.
I am not claiming that no antisemitic incidents are happening on US campuses, btw, that would be preposterous. Just that the Columbia protest camp has been widely reported to be non-violent and welcoming of Jewish students and Jewish expressions of faith.
In contrast ...
I managed to catch up on two talks/panels given/organised by @ER_Roberts_ and her organisation Working Class Climate Alliance @_WCCA over past days and I have lots of (mostly extremely positive) thoughts to share with you all. A 🧵. 1/
First, links to the talks.
1⃣ By Emma herself, hosted by @ProfJohnBarry in Belfast, link here
2⃣ And a panel hosted by Emma, featuring my old friend @payalclimate as well as @assad_shoaib @Matthuber78 and Michael Albert.
2/
Please watch both, they are well worth it. What follows are just my additional thoughts and notes.
To start with, I am a middle class twit and very clueless about class in exactly the ways that Emma explains are so harmful, so I learned a lot, and found lots to think about.
3/
Je reviens dans cette discussion, car je veux clarifier la contribution scientifique de @ysaheb. Valérie Masson-Delmotte a bien sûr raison, le terme de sobriété (=sufficiency) a apparu dans de précédents rapports du GIEC. Par contre, il n'a jamais apparu dans le résumé pour... 1/
décideurs (=Summary for Policy Makers=SPM) qui est approuvé par les gouvernements et donc a le poids d'un texte onusien, c'est à dire que tous les gouvernements reconnaissent la validité précise du contenu et des termes. Non seulement c'est grâce au travail scientifique ...
2/
Yamina Saheb dans le cadre de son travail d'auteur principal du chapitre sur les bâtiments que ce terme a un poids suffisamment important pour qu'il soit inclut dans le SPM, mais en plus les gouvernements ont demandé une définition, la fameuse note de bas de page 59 ... 3/
Not entirely comfortable doing this, but Twitter is where I think my thoughts out loud, and I recently read (*) "How To Blow Up A Pipeline" by Andreas Malm, and I have ... thoughts. A 🧵, obviously.
😍 First of all, I LOVED it, which I was not expecting. It is a thoughtful ... 1/
careful book, interested in people and ideas and history. It is much less a rah-rah manifesto, and much more a "what have people done in the past, what can we do now, let's think through pros and cons, ok?" kind of book. It is lovely. Read it. It is not long, 3 main chapters.
2/
My guess is you will love it too.
Chapter 1 is an overview of resistance to fossil fuel infrastructure from past struggles, the vast majority of which was anticolonial, not climate-motivated. It is super interesting. It demonstrates that fossil fuel infrastructure is ...
3/