Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
May 16, 2024 118 tweets 15 min read Read on X
Good morning from New York.

The first day of Michael Cohen's cross-ex began with a reminder that he called Trump's lead attorney Todd Blanche a "crying little s***."

Outside the jury's ear, the judge then scolded Blanche for "making this about yourself."

Day Two ahead 🧵
The Day One transcript reveals the sidebar discussion from after that explosive start.

Blanche pushed back: "I'm not making it about myself, your honor. I have a right to show this witness's bias, and he has expressed bias about the lawyers just because of who we represent."
Later, the judge responded: "It doesn't matter if he has bias towards you; it doesn't matter. The issue is whether he has bias towards the defendant."
Some takeaways from Day One of cross:

If jurors didn't know Michael Cohen's public persona before Tuesday, they do now.

* Cohen agreed that 200+ episodes of his podcast mention Trump.
* They heard the profane taunts.
* They saw him in merch of Trump in an orange jumpsuit.
Some apparently new info also came out:

The first time Manhattan prosecutors visited him in Otisville prison, Cohen asked how meeting with them could benefit him.

This was after he told a federal judge and Congress he turned over a new, civic-minded leaf.
Cohen acknowledged: "I did ask that," referring to the advantages of his cooperation.
In another string of questions, Trump's lawyer also asked Cohen about prosecutors repeatedly urging him not to make statements about the case — warning that he could "unwittingly" benefit Trump.

And Cohen continuing to taunt Trump in public anyway.
So far, the cross has not gone to the evidence at the heart of the case, extensively corroborating Cohen's account and shown to the jury during his direct examination.

We'll see whether Blanche turns to that evidence in Day Two.
Now:

Trump enters the courtroom.

In court today: Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert and others.
Gaetz is seated between Eric Trump and Boebert in the front left row of the gallery — directly behind the defendant.
After Justice Merchan enters the courtroom, the attorneys have a lengthy sidebar conference at his bench.
This is one long sidebar. We'll see if the transcript will be interesting.
"All rise."

The jury enters, with Michael Cohen back on the stand.

Justice Merchan informs the jury that they may have to work next Wednesday, with the Memorial Day weekend coming up as trial winds toward a close.
Trump's lead attorney Todd Blanche resumes his cross with questions about Cohen's communications with Detective Jeremy Rosenberg from the DA's office.
Blanche wants to refresh Cohen's memory with communications that aren't in evidence — and slips.

He asks the court to put the materials available on the screen for the "defendant," before correcting himself and saying "the witness," i.e. Cohen.
Blanche wants to admit Cohen's texts with Rosenberg into evidence, and then Hoffinger springs up to ask Cohen whether the communications are largely redacted and therefore out of context.

They are, Cohen says.

Prosecutor: "We object."
Judge: "Please approach." (Sidebar)
After the sidebar, Justice Merchan sustains the objection.

The communications won't come in, but Blanche continues to ask about them. Another misstep.

Objection.
Sustained.
Q: Do you recall prior to the indictment being unsealed, the public learned that President Trump had been indicted?
A: Yes, sir.

Asked whether the detective confirmed to him that it "was done," Cohen says he doesn't understand the question.
Blanche asks: "Detective Rosenberg didn't tell you that they told the New York Times before they told you."

Objection.
Sustained.

Judge: "When you say 'they,' who are you referring to?"
Blanche wants to suggest that the DA's office gave the NYT the tip-off, but Cohen resists that.

The exchange seems to suggest the detective just gave a heads up of what the Times reported.
Asked whether Cohen said the DA's office "Goliath on his back," Cohen says that sounds correct.
Once again, Cohen agrees that he went on TV after the DA's office urged him not to do so.
Blanche plays audio of Cohen's enthusiastic reaction to the indictment on his podcast for the jury.
Blanche shows Cohen the Truth Social post by Trump calling Daniels a "Horseface" and Cohen a "convicted liar."

Asked if he responded to the post, Cohen says: "I don't have a Truth Social post, sir."
Blanche says he responded on "X," calling Trump "Dumbass Donald."

"Sounds correct," Cohen responds.
Blanche turns to Cohen's frequent testimony.
Q: Was the oath that you took every single time [...] the same oath that you took Monday morning?"

"Yes, sir," Cohen says.

Cohen agrees with Blanche that the oath doesn't change.
Blanche goes through Cohen's lies about the since-abandoned Trump Tower Moscow project. Cohen freely acknowledges it.

Unsaid by Blanche, these were undoubtedly lies to protect Trump.

It'll also undoubtedly come up on redirect.
That fact comes up now:

Q: Even at the time that you pled guilty [...] you said that you made those statements [...] out of loyalty to President Trump, correct?
A: Correct.
Not all of Cohen's charges were Trump-related, though, Blanche says.

The lawyer reviews the FBI's search of Cohen's home.
Cohen says he learned his then-business associate Gene Freidman was cooperating months after the search.
Blanche leads Cohen through his 2018 guilty plea — along with his swearing in. It's clear where this is going.

During Trump's civil fraud trial, Cohen said he lied then about being guilty of the tax evasion for the taxi medallions.
Cohen clarified his answer on direct examination and once again now, on cross. He says that federal prosecutors gave him 48 hours to accept or face a new indictment charging his wife.
Cohen:

"I never denied the underlying facts [of the tax offenses]. I just did not believe that I should have been charged by either of those two, or I should say six, offenses."
Cohen's answers here are much smoother than during Trump's civil fraud trial, when he was questioned by Alina Habba.
Cohen has been delivering crisp, clear, responsive answers, with a level volume and steady voice.

At least so far, he's not sounding defensive or going off on tangents.
Cohen:

"I believed that I should not have been charged — yes, sir."

But Trump's lawyer noted Cohen didn't say that in his book.
In his book, Cohen agrees, he said the charges were "100 percent inaccurate."
Cohen also agrees he said in a TikTok that the SDNY's federal investigation was the "most corrupt" in at least 100 years.

Blanche pushes this line of questioning until prosecutor Hoffinger objects. Sidebar.
After the sidebar, Blanche moves on to another topic: Cohen's interview on CNN.

Cohen agrees that he said at the time that "the lies of the prosecutors from the Southern District of New York would eventually be exposed."
Analysis:

Since the civil fraud trial, Cohen distancing himself from the tax offenses were always going to be a pressure point on cross. Blanche keeps pushing it, and there's no new ground broken here.

But it may be new for the jury.
Cohen agrees he also harshly criticized the late-federal judge who sentenced him.

Q: You do believe Judge Pauley was in on it?
A: I do.

Cohen agrees he called Pauley and SDNY prosecutors "fucking animals."
Cohen repeats his view that the tax offenses should have been treated civilly, through a letter alerting him, before criminally charging him.
Cohen:

"I should not have been charged with a tax crime."

He agrees that he shouldn't have been charged with a HELOC (home equity line of credit) violation, for how he obtained the money to funnel to Stormy Daniels.
For the first time of cross, Cohen is reminded to answer only the questions posed to him rather than giving speeches.

That happened frequently during Trump's civil trial last year.

Cohen has been much more disciplined now, so far.
Cohen doesn't backpedal from his testimony that he lied to Pauley about believing he was guilty of the tax offenses.

Q: The reason you lied to a federal judge is that the stakes affected you personally?
A: Yes.
Cohen acknowledged his "mistakes" about his taxes to Congress, but Blanche notes that he didn't disclose his strident criticism about being charged with those offenses at the time.

"I don't believe I was asked the question," Cohen responds.
Q: Do you agree with me that lying under oath is not accepting responsibility?
A: Could you clarify your question?
Cohen:

"I accepted responsibility, and I was suffering the consequences as a result."
Cohen agrees criminal defendants get credit at sentencing for accepting responsibility.

Blanche says Cohen got that credit even though Cohen "lied."

Cohen says that judge's have a wide range of discretion over guidelines.
Cohen agrees that, at different times, he has blamed the bank, the prosecutors, the judge, and Trump for his downfall.

Q: Does the outcome of this trial affect you personally?
A: Yes.
Cohen agrees that there's nothing wrong in the taxi medallion business with having 16 LLCs. That's standard for that industry.

(Unclear what the purpose of that question is, unless Blanche is trying to blunt the sting of the shell companies in the Daniels/McDougal payoffs.)
Q: Do you know whether your wife ever found out what you did with the $130,000 and the HELOC [home equity line of credit]?

Objection.
Sustained.
Cohen said that his wife had no knowledge about the $130,000 HELOC transaction, apparently referring to the Stormy Daniels payoff.
Asked whether he was aware of deleting messages with his wife in the March 2018 time frame, Cohen says he wasn't aware.

Blanche presses the line of questioning with people other than his wife until Cohen notes Signal has an automatically disappearing messages feature.
In 2019, Cohen told Congress: "I have never asked for, nor would I accept, a pardon from President Trump." But Blanche noted that Cohen asked two lawyers about the possibility of a pardon.

Now, Cohen doesn't deny it:

"I wanted this nightmare to end."
Cohen notes that they corrected the "misstatement."

Asked whether that was because it wasn't true when he made it, Cohen agrees.
Morning recess.
We're back:

Assistant DA Matthew Colangelo says that Blanche's cross left a "misleading impression" that the indictment was leaked, and he notes the fact of the indictment was unsealed before the indictment itself.

The prosecution wants a curative instruction.
Blanche opposes, citing the exchange between Cohen and the detective.

The judge gives Blanche an opportunity to "clean up" this line of questioning.
Justice Merchan says jurors informed the court that they cannot work next Wednesday.

"So, that's off the table," the judge says.
If the defense doesn't bring a case — which is a possibility — closing arguments and deliberations could conceivably begin next week, right before the Memorial Day weekend.

That could create complications, and that's why the court considered the Wednesday option.
We'll see how the matter resolves, which will depend in large part on whether defense and rebuttal cases are going to happen.
Cohen's cross resumes.

Blanche asks whether it's fair to say that one of the reasons that Cohen accepted responsibility and pleaded guilty was that he wanted to consider cooperation.
Q: "Ultimately, that effort did not result in a cooperation agreement," isn't that correct?

A: "That's correct."
In a separate email, I just got a new chunk of transcript with this line from Trump:

"In fact, a lead person from the DOJ is running this trial. So Biden's office is running this trial."

That's been seen by some as a veiled reference to ex-DOJ official Matthew Colangelo. Unclear whether prosecutors view it the same way, and if so, if they believe that implicates (b)(1) and take any action.Image
Q: The truth of the matter was, Mr. Cohen, you really wanted to work in the White House?
A: No, sir.
Cohen previously testified that he knew he wasn't qualified for a White House chief of staff position, but he wanted to be considered for it because of his "ego."

Blanche suggests this wasn't true. Cohen insists that it was.
Blanche notes that Cohen talked about the chief of staff position with other people.

Cohen's daughter alerted him that Reince Priebus was vying for the position, and he agrees he said that Preibus was "pushing like a madman."

Priebus ultimately got the position.
Blanche pushes this line of questioning for awhile, trying to poke holes in Cohen's line that he didn't really want the chief of staff position.

Cohen testifies that he told his daughter that there's "no shame" in being personal attorney to the President, his eventual title.
Blanche notes that Cohen had Pastor Scott, the head of Trump's diversity coalition, "put in a good word" to the then-president elect.
Analysis:

The defense is depicting Cohen's turn against Trump as sour grapes and payback to being spurned. Cohen keeps pushing back about this alleged motivation.
Cohen frequently delivers his testimony straight to the jurors — and they continue to hold eye contact with him, even throughout a contentious cross-ex.
Blanche asks a string of questions about Cohen receiving harassing phone calls, including from a 14-year-old.

Cohen complained to Trump's bodyguard Keith Schiller about it, Blanche says.
Blanche is getting worked up, launching into an indignant speech with no apparent question:

"We aren't asking about your belief. [...] This jury..."—

Prosecutor: Objection.
Judge: Sustained
Blanche continues his angry statements, not questions, about the harassing phone call from the 14-year-old.

Prosecutor: "Objection."
Judge: "Sustained."

On that note — Lunch recess.
Back from lunch.

Before the afternoon session begins, a quick note on how the morning ended:

Blanche confronted Cohen on a phone call with Trump through his bodyguard with Keith Schiller on Oct. 24, 2016. During direct, Cohen testified they discussed Stormy Daniels.
During cross, Blanche introduced an alternative theory of the call:

Cohen was worked up from receiving a harassing phone call from a 14-year-old, who didn't mask his number, and he called Schiller about it.

In a tense exchange, Cohen said both topics came up.
The defense is trying to sow doubt about Cohen's uncorroborated account of this particular call, hoping that it was raise questions about other, more damaging calls.

Like a pair of calls between Cohen and Trump two days later.
On Oct. 26, 2016, Cohen opened up his First Republic Bank account for the shell company that funneled money to Stormy Daniels' lawyer, shortly after phone logs showed two calls with Trump.

An alternative theory for these calls hasn't yet been established during cross-ex.
Will one be during cross-examination?

We may find out soon, either way.
One thing's for certain:

Blanche thought the point was so important that he waited just before the lunch recess to make it, angrily, with indignant accusations and statements — that a seasoned lawyer like him must have known would draw the sustained objections that they did.
Blanche likely did so as punctuation drawing jurors' attention to the point he wanted to make.

Now, the afternoon session begins.
Blanche starts the afternoon session by showing more about Cohen's text exchange with Trump's bodyguard Keith Schiller.

These messages do not appear to have been previously submitted into evidence.

They aren't part of this batch. pdfs.nycourts.gov/PeopleVs.DTrum…
Cohen agrees that he worked very hard to get good press for Trump.

Q: You also worked very hard to make sure there were positive stories about you, at times?
A: Yes, sir.
Cohen agrees that he had a "Rolodex" full of reporters' contact information.

"It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump" because if he disagreed with the framing of the story that he wanted to put out, it would probably cost Cohen his job, Cohen says.
Asked whether Cohen sometimes spoke to the press without consulting with Trump, Cohen replies:

"No, sir. I would always get a comment, or something in line with a conversation we had in line with that specific topic."
Blanche notes that Trump's campaign sometimes got frustrated at Cohen for going off-message, but Cohen says that's because he was relaying Trump's messaging, not the campaign's.
Cohen says he had a strong professional relationship with Chris Cuomo, Katy Tur and Maggie Haberman.

Q: There were many times when you gave Ms. Haberman a scoop?
A: Yes, sir.
One of Cohen's pitches to Haberman involved an (as-yet-unidentified) recorded phone call.

Q: Did you tell people you were recording them?
A: No, sir.
Cohen notes that recording calls isn't illegal in New York, a one-party consent state.

"Mr. Cohen, I did not ask you if you were breaking the law," Blanche says.
Cohen agrees that there were 95 secret recordings found on his cell phone.
Blanche asks who else Cohen "surreptitiously" recorded.

They included Jeff Zucker, Trump, and reporters, Cohen says.

Q: You understand that it's not ethical for a lawyer to record a conversation with a client?
A: That's correct.
Asked whether he ever spoke of the National Enquirer's power to deliver its message through its placement in supermarkets, Cohen responds: not that I recall.
Scene from the hallway before the afternoon session, via the trial press pool:

"Trump returned to the courtroom at 2:08. He did not respond to shouted questions about whether he would testify but gave a fist pump."
Blanche turns to the McDougal story and suggests Trump didn't share Cohen's view that her accusations would hurt him.

Cohen pushes back on that assertion.
Blanche gets Cohen to agree that he's received 50,000 to 60,000 phone calls between 2016 and today — and sarcastically asks him about remembering the damaging details of some of them.

Cohen: "Because these phone calls are things that I've been talking about" for many years.
Blanche turns to Cohen's recorded conversation where Trump said: "pay with cash," and Blanche suggests this doesn't refer to "green" — rather, it means not financing, he says.

Cohen disagrees, suggesting cash means cash.
That's why the next line of the transcript after Cohen rejects the proposition of "pay[ing] with cash" is the word "check," Cohen says.

Blanche notes the recording cuts off right after that. pdfs.nycourts.gov/PeopleVs.DTrum…
Image
Cohen says the tape cut off because a call came in on the phone he was recording Trump on.

Blanche: "You sure about that?"
Cohen: "Positive."
Afternoon recess.
After Blanche asks whether Cohen ever expressed the view that Keith Davidson was extorting Trump, the prosecutors object.

Judge: Overruled.

Cohen agrees he once opined "that they were extorting Mr. Trump."
Blanche rattles off Michael Cohen's work for Trump, his company and his family members.

Q: And you never had a retainer agreement with any of those individuals?
A: No, sir.
Blanche says the "whole truthful testimony" is "the whole time you worked for the Trump Organization, you never had a retainer agreement."

Cohen agrees that he never did.
Analysis:

Where's Blanche going with this? The answer is, the defense maintains that the $420,000 paid to Cohen in installments of $35K/month was his legal fees, not reimbursements for Daniels, the RedFinch expense, grossing up and the bonus.
Blanche shows Cohen the statement through his law firm that neither the "Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign" was a party to the Stormy Daniels payoff.

In direct, Cohen said that this was cleverly worded to avoid the actual other party: Trump.
On cross, Cohen agrees that the actual statement itself is true, however.
Blanche shows Cohen the statement he sent to reporters denouncing the FEC complaint about the Stormy Daniels matter.

"Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage. I will always protect Mr. Trump."
Cohen agrees that he recorded himself telling a reporter that they had to believe his denial of the FEC complaint's allegations because he's a "very bad liar."

But he now says he was lying to them at the time.
And so, Michael Cohen's testimony stretches to another week as trial proceedings end in the middle of his cross.

Justice Merchan instructs the jury.
Reminder:

Court is in recess on Friday to allow Trump to attend son Barron Trump's graduation. The former president is also slated to attend a Minnesota GOP dinner.

palmbeachpost.com/story/news/tru…
After the jury leaves, Trump's attorney Emil Bove previews potential testimony by campaign finance law expert Bradley A. Smith.

Justice Merchan established some of the boundaries of his testimony before trial began. justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
For the past 10 minutes, the prosecution and defense has been litigating how much latitude the defense gets for Smith's proposed testimony.
Justice Merchan says he will "read and study" both sets of submission, but until then, the judge says, his earlier ruling has not changed—and the defense witness's testimony is "greatly limited."

Review the earlier ruling here. justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
Justice Merchan says he will "read and study" both sets of submission, but until then, the judge says, his earlier ruling has not changed—and the defense witness's testimony is "greatly limited."

Review the earlier ruling here. justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
With the Memorial Day coming, Merchan says he's going to try to avoid a big lapse of time between summations and the jury charge.

Blanche estimates that he will be finished with cross on Monday, before the morning break.

Redirect will take under an hour, Hoffinger says.
Blanche says he anticipates making a decision on rebuttal witnesses today.

Merchan notes that means it's possible that the evidentiary phase of the trial might close on Monday, and he urges the lawyers to be prepared for the possibility of summations on Tuesday.
The variables, of course, include: Does the defense call Trump, or for that matter, anyone else?

Trial ends for the day.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

May 21
This isn’t a legal document.

It’s a PR document that in parts contradicts how the legal document reveals how the fund will actually operate.

Some examples 🧵⬇️
PR Document: "There is no partisan restriction."

Here's how the plainly partisan way in which the legal document defines the "representative" conduct. Image
PR Document: Trump, his family and the Trump Organization won't receive any monetary compensation or damages from it.

Half-true, but there's a big asterisk: "Claimants can include entities," which is why sources told ABC News that Trump's entities could apply. Image
Read 13 tweets
May 20
The “confidential investigation documents” that Patel evasively alludes to is Volume II of the Jack Smith report, per the indictment.

It’s the only special counsel final report in US history that’s not been publicly released, as a result of Judge Cannon’s order at Trump’s urging.Image
Lineberger's case was filed in the Southern District of Florida's Fort Pierce division, virtually guaranteeing a favorable judicial assignment for Trump DOJ.

Instead of Cannon, the case goes to newly minted Judge Ed Artau, who has this tangled history. politico.com/news/2025/06/2…
Read 5 tweets
May 6
Trump DOJ opposes the release of SPLC grand jury transcripts, but what the memo *doesn't* say speaks volumes. Feds don't dispute the SPLC's account of the Trump admin's "gross misrepresentations" about the informant program.

Instead, the US Attorney says that's "not relevant."

Why that matters.🧵Moreover, the public comments in question—whether the SPLC ever shared information obtained by its field sources with law enforcement—are simply not relevant to the charges in the indictment. This case is about fraudulently obtaining money from donors, lying to banks, and concealing payments to the same organizations the SPLC publicly told donors they were fighting against. (Doc. 1 at 3–6). What, if anything, the SPLC did with the information it obtained through field sources is not relevant to the charges.
The SPLC's motion seeking the grand jury records rattled off a series of "false statements" by Trump and his surrogates about Charlottesville and the informants program.

The group said info gathered there thwarted a terrorist attack and led to arrests. allrisenews.com/p/splc-tipped-…
Debunking Trump's revisionist history of Charlottesville, SPLC said it handed the FBI a 45-page “Event Alert” with informant-gathered information.

The dossier tipped off agents about the names, photos, criminal histories and "weapons of choice of the people there."
Read 6 tweets
Apr 23
By the DOJ's own account, the SPLC's informant program was cheap and effective.

For a fraction of a *percentage* of their annual budget, SPLC penetrated the nation's worst hate groups and published their secrets with info from their turncoats.

The DOJ's case assumes donors felt defrauded by this. buff.ly/cwTnYg6
The Trump DOJ alleges that the SPLC spent about $3 million on informants over the course of a *decade.*

Check out of the SPLC's revenue and expenditures from 2024, the last fiscal year records were public. That's a typical year, and it's a drop in the bucket. projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
In return, SPLC infiltrated the KKK, the neo-Nazis, and other extremist groups, and they shared their secrets with federal law enforcement until Kash Patel put an end to that last October.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14
Two Trump appointees on the D.C. Circuit panel blocked Boasberg from even INVESTIGATING contempt of court related to the March 2025 flights to El Salvador.

The dissent: "Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands."

Opinions buff.ly/4kr3ALC"Contempt of court is a public offense, and the fate of our democratic republic will depend on whether we treat it as such. In the many forms in which it can be committed, contempt degrades the power that the People, through their Constitution and Congress, gave the federal courts. Without the contempt power, the rule of law is an illusion, a theory that stands upon shifting sands. For contempt offends not only the authority of whichever judge has been subjected to such incursions, but it also offends our system of governance. Addressing contempt is, therefore, a responsibility that is...
This is the second time Judges Rao and Walker granted a writ of mandamus, an "extraordinary" rebuke of a lower court judge.

But Walker went out of the way to praise Boasberg, saying he was in a tough spot even as Walker overruled him. The district court needed to make a quick decision. The facts on the ground were changing, jurisdiction was unclear, and the merits depended on the meaning of a statute from the 1700s that hadn’t been invoked in the past 75 years.6 I do not envy the position of any judge facing such time pressure to make hard and high-stakes legal decisions. Fortunately, the trial judge assigned to this case had more than two decades of judicial experience, with a widely respected record of dispassionate decisionmaking.
The nuance here will be important to note in light of the Trump DOJ's campaign to vilify Boasberg, whose D.C. Circuit peers largely stood up for him even when his rulings didn't hold.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10
A hearing over Anthropic's lawsuit against the Pentagon is underway: The AI giant's lawyer Michael Mongan asks for a hearing as early as Friday.

“There really are irreparable injuries that are concrete and are mounting every day.”

Judge Lin appears skeptical about moving too quickly.
Trump's government has been "affirmatively reaching out to [Anthropic's] customers" and urging them not to work with the company, per Mongan.
DOJ Attorney James Harlow pushes for a March 18
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(