Israel's reaction to the announcement by Norway, Spain, and Ireland, that they formally recognise the State of Palestine, shows again that Israel seeks annexation and permanent occupation over Palestine, as the lawyers for Palestine said in the ICJ on 19 February:
The permanent character of the Israeli occupation and the denial of Palestinian right to self-determination, to be free from the yoke of Israeli colonialism, is evident in what Israel has said and did.
This is clear in statements by officials regarding Israeli sovereignty over Palestine
These Israeli statements reject the two state solution and erase the "green line"
This is also clear in the annexation of East Jerusalem and the intent to permanently annex it.
This is also clear regarding the annexation of the West Bank
This is clear in the government's official documents: exclusive right for the Jewish People over the "Land of Israel", including the Golan!
As the UN Rapporteur Michael Lynk said in 2022: "Israel has progressively engaged in the de jure and de facto annexation of occupied territory" in defiance of international law for decades. un.org/unispal/docume…
All these facts preceded October, and in fact there was acceleration in 2023 of the denial of Palestinian freedom and the entrenchment of the occupation and apartheid
This acceleration included the unleashing of state-sponsored settler violence in the West Bank, before October.
After October, Netanyahu reiterated his long-standing opposition to a Palestinian state, a position that Gantz shares, and have also recently repeated.
it is thus clear that this is not about Hamas or Gaza: that Israel has sought to negate the Palestinian people's right to self determination.
Israel's subjective determination of "Security" cannot trump or condition the Palestinian right to self-determination.
Israel cannot be given a veto power over Palestinian freedom
The illegality of the occupation and the long-standing denial of Palestinian freedom requires an immediate end to the occupation and sanctions over and boycott of Israel.
1. The defects of Liberal Zionism are evident in this interview with David Grossman, one of the first liberal zionists to acknowledge that Israel is committing genocide: 🧵
2. Denial and delaying criticism: "I have done everything I could to avoid having to call Israel a genocidal state" (echoes Omer Bartov in NYT article).
So you have been part of the problem when others were screaming into the void.
3. Despite denial (in the face of mounting evidence of mass atrocities) no acknowledgement of the moral failure: "I am still a moral person, I am speaking up"
(after 18,500 children killed, after 90% of Gaza was destroyed and when population is crammed into 12% of territory)
Israel's genocidal intent is evidenced by the existence of a genocidal consensus since October 2023. This consensus is clear in the ongoing public production of incitement to genocide, for 660+ days, coupled with the failure of the state to prevent or punish this incitement. 🧵
South Africa in its submissions to UN Security Council in May 2024 and February 2025 included examples of incitement to genocide by journalists and pundits and popular culture.
1. Now that even @nytimes cannot hide the effect of Israel-made starvation, it is important to remind all those who are "appalled" now, that they should have been appalled earlier. Here is what the ICC said in the arrest warrants of Nov 2024 re Israel's conduct till 20 May 2024:
2. "that both individuals intentionally and knowingly deprived the civilian population in Gaza of objects indispensable to their survival, including food, water, and medicine and medical supplies, as well as fuel and electricity, from at least 8 October 2023 to 20 May 2024"
3. "decisions allowing or increasing humanitarian assistance into Gaza were often conditional. They were not made to fulfil Israel’s obligations under international humanitarian law" and "were not sufficient to improve the population’s access to essential goods."
Do not forget the ideological mindset, including his government's guiding principles in Dec 2022. Bibi is not merely an opportunist, but also a racist and an extremist.
The ICJ is failing Palestine like it failed Bosnia.
1. What is the point of the @CIJ_ICJ? Despite the urgency, they are yet to issue their opinion on Israel's obligations towards the UN, including its humanitarian organisations, in Palestine.
2. The timid states did not want to do anything concrete to pressure Israel so they went to the UNGA to refer Israel to the @CIJ_ICJ and then their lawyers made forceful speeches. They passed the ball to the court and the court is dragging its feet.
3. The @CIJ_ICJ can also act on its own initiative ("in propio motu") in the genocide case, South Africa v. Israel, and yet declines to do so, despite the extreme urgency that is clear to anyone with a phone and a conscience.