Israel's reaction to the announcement by Norway, Spain, and Ireland, that they formally recognise the State of Palestine, shows again that Israel seeks annexation and permanent occupation over Palestine, as the lawyers for Palestine said in the ICJ on 19 February:
The permanent character of the Israeli occupation and the denial of Palestinian right to self-determination, to be free from the yoke of Israeli colonialism, is evident in what Israel has said and did.
This is clear in statements by officials regarding Israeli sovereignty over Palestine
These Israeli statements reject the two state solution and erase the "green line"
This is also clear in the annexation of East Jerusalem and the intent to permanently annex it.
This is also clear regarding the annexation of the West Bank
This is clear in the government's official documents: exclusive right for the Jewish People over the "Land of Israel", including the Golan!
As the UN Rapporteur Michael Lynk said in 2022: "Israel has progressively engaged in the de jure and de facto annexation of occupied territory" in defiance of international law for decades. un.org/unispal/docume…
All these facts preceded October, and in fact there was acceleration in 2023 of the denial of Palestinian freedom and the entrenchment of the occupation and apartheid
This acceleration included the unleashing of state-sponsored settler violence in the West Bank, before October.
After October, Netanyahu reiterated his long-standing opposition to a Palestinian state, a position that Gantz shares, and have also recently repeated.
it is thus clear that this is not about Hamas or Gaza: that Israel has sought to negate the Palestinian people's right to self determination.
Israel's subjective determination of "Security" cannot trump or condition the Palestinian right to self-determination.
Israel cannot be given a veto power over Palestinian freedom
The illegality of the occupation and the long-standing denial of Palestinian freedom requires an immediate end to the occupation and sanctions over and boycott of Israel.
1. The most annoying thing about the Ezra Klein interview with Philippe Sands is his use of Lemkin to maintain that 7 October was a genocide. It is had to reconcile this with Lemkin's actual book. A brief 🧵
2. The glaring omission from this statement by Sands are the words "occupation" and "coordinated plan"; and thus the recognition of the gross power asymmetry between Israelis and Palestinians. To begin with, here is Lemkin's definition:
3. Lemkin continues: genocide has 2 phases...
(Who has confiscated the lands and displaced the residents? Who has de-nationalised? Who has imposed their national pattern? who is the occupier?)
1. When journalists say 'Israel says' they are not actually quoting what Israeli leaders say repeatedly, rather they are simply repeating talking points that conceal what Israel actually says and does. Examples since March 2025🧵
2. Talking point: "This will all end if Hamas releases the hostages."
Netanyahu, March 2025: "voluntary migration. This is the plan. We are not hiding it." gov.il/en/pages/pm-ne…
3. Talking point: "Israel did not say that it is using starvation as a method of warfare."
a) Israel, 2 March 2025: "PM Netanyahu has decided that, as of this morning, the entry of all goods and supplies to the Gaza Strip will be halted." gov.il/en/pages/spoke…
1. “Children shot in the chest while reaching for food. People crushed or suffocated in stampedes. Entire crowds gunned down at distribution points. In @MSF nearly 54 years of operations, rarely have we seen such levels of systematic violence against unarmed civilians.”
@MSF 3. "We’re being slaughtered. I’ve been injured maybe 10 times. I saw it with my own eyes, about 20 corpses around me. All of them shot in the head, in the stomach." - Mohammed Riad Tabasi, a patient who was treated at the @MSF Al-Mawasi clinic msf.org/ghf-run-food-d…
1. Sophistry alert: More than 20 paragraphs in this article by Guglielmo Verdirame in @ejiltalk and yet there is not even a beginning of an argument why it would be "unlawful" for the UK government to recognise Palestine! ejiltalk.org/the-british-st…
2. This sophistry is effectively an opposition to Palestinian self-determination. While Verdirame et al reject any recognition of Palestine, citing the "facts", they fully know it's Israel that is creating these facts: annexation and denial of self-determination.
3. Verdirame's partisan views are clear in this October 2023 speech in the Lords which adopted and defended a pro-Israeli view of "proportionality" in "self-defence" - the highly permissive nature of this view has legitimated the genocidal destruction we've witnessed.
1. Is that the new cowardly mantra now in British media? "We will suspend moral or political judgment, despite scholarly consensus and overwhelming evidence, unless and until a court rules on it"?
2. Of course the msm media is not only hiding behind the "court has not ruled yet" to avoid the question of genocide, they are also avoiding judgment on war crimes and crimes against humanity like apartheid.
3. Of course courts have ruled (@CIJ_ICJ twice in 2004 and 2024 on Israel's grosss and decades long violations of basic norms in international law) and you do not see these, suddenly, court-centric journalists referring to them
1. The defects of Liberal Zionism are evident in this interview with David Grossman, one of the first liberal zionists to acknowledge that Israel is committing genocide: 🧵
2. Denial and delaying criticism: "I have done everything I could to avoid having to call Israel a genocidal state" (echoes Omer Bartov in NYT article).
So you have been part of the problem when others were screaming into the void.
3. Despite denial (in the face of mounting evidence of mass atrocities) no acknowledgement of the moral failure: "I am still a moral person, I am speaking up"
(after 18,500 children killed, after 90% of Gaza was destroyed and when population is crammed into 12% of territory)