Short thread on the most important aspect of the FIT 21 bill - the five prong decentralization test to determine whether or not an asset is a digital commodity.
Expect all protocols with goals of decentralizing to be paying very close attention to this test.
Bill text below 👇
Prong 1 - Power Rule
Prong 1 has two subdivisions concerning the previous 12 month period.
(I) - no person* can change the code
*more on what a person is at the end of the thread
(ii) - no person can prohibit any other person from using the system in any way
Prong 1 thus requires protocols not to have admin censorship powers!
Prong 2 - Ownership and Voting
The 2nd prong has three subdivisions
(i) - in the last year, no 'affiliated person' can own 20% of the asset
(ii) - ***no 'person' had the power to direct 20% of voting power***
(iii) - must give up power
Think about that. Prong 2 is powerful.
No affiliated person can own 20% would immediately hurt many token generation event plans. Further, dissolution means nothing if the founder/founder's delegates own >20% voting power
*cough* Rune *cough*
Prong 3 - Code Changes
The 3rd prong has two subdivisions.
(i) in the last three(!) months no changes were made to the code by 'persons' except for maintenance, bugs, and vulnerabilities or...
(ii) in the last three months no changes were made unless "adopted through the consensus or agreement of a decentralized governance system."
Prong 3 makes it clear that development teams must take a backseat to DAOs.
Prong 4 - No Marketing as Investment
Doesn't get any simpler - don't market the asset as an investment within the past 3 months
Prong 5 - Rules of Inflation
Token issuance in the last 12 months must be an end user distribution - government talk for an airdrop that: 1 is broadly distributed, 2 relates to the nature of the chain, or 3 is based on the holdings of another asset.
Inflation seemingly cannot go to DAOs based on prong 5 but can be used to incentivize activity like mining or staking.
What is an 'affiliated person'? What is a 'related person'?
Pretty much anyone who has had a formal connection to the founding team or company. This is quite broad and it does not appear that the dissolution of a company would offer any protection to the quasi-separate members.
All in all, these five prongs would end up classifying many popular gov tokens as securities, perhaps rightly so.
The prongs are surprisingly thorough and reflect the nuance of crypto. If all assets lived up to these standards we would see less fraud.
I believe FIT 21 is the right decision for crypto and America.
Thank you to all the dems who crossed the aisle today and I'll be on your phonelines for the next bill :)
If i've misinterpreted anything pls let me know 🙏 @lex_node
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will describe how Eigenlayer can be used without adding existential risk to a protocol. I suggest a unique collaboration between Rocket Pool and @Eigenlayer
The RP GMC has approved a $60,000 bounty for the completion of the RP x @Eigenlayer integration, pending pDAO vote.
2/31
BIG PICTURE
Rocket Pool will hold senior debt so that in case of disaster, rETH is always made whole first.
The Ethereum withdrawal address will go to the Rocket Pool contract *before* it touches Eigenlayer.
Once upon a time, I wrote about the @Rocket_Pool layer zero bull case.
Rocket Pool has a bonafide army of node operators with huge capital at stake - the perfect partner to turn @eigenlayer into a decentralized powerhouse.
Time to bring yield to decentralization, a thread 👇
With over 3,000 node operators and no foundation-based delegation, @Rocket_Pool is a more decentralized protocol than almost any L1.
All this decentralized trust plus >$2 billion in locked economic security.
Technical, capitalized, aligned.
All that's missing is a marketplace.
With only 100 nodes, @eigenlayer is targeting 10 MB/s data throughput.
Imagine what would be possible with 30x that number of nodes. Perhaps 1 GBps is not so far away after all 🤔
Did you know that a @Rocket_Pool tokenomics overhaul is currently being voted on?
There are 4(!!) major votes to be decided.
13% $RPL APR??
Inflation allocation, grants committee membership, reward AND collateral system - all being voted on.
Let's dive in.
⚖️
@Rocket_Pool #1 RPL Staking Rework - RPIP-30
This is a behemoth, the product of many in the community iterating for months before the proposal being voted on now.
At a high level, this vote changes $RPL rewards from a linear scale to one that more directly rewards creating rETH supply
@Rocket_Pool Currently, a large amount of inflation is directed to node operators that have 150% of their ETH stake as $RPL staked. These $RPL whales enjoy the most rewards.
Further, the incentive to join the network or to top up collateral at 10% is getting weaker as more RPL gets staked.