Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture
May 24 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
When a Supreme Court justice is caught flying MAGA battle flags at his houses, it’s a pretty dazzling transgression. 🧵
But not a solitary one. It is worsened by the billionaire-funded gifts program for Thomas and Alito that rewards them with Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.
It is worsened by secrecy in not disclosing these extravagant gifts, and by warping laws and rules to protect that secrecy, and very possibly by tax law violations around those gifts.
It is worsened by Alito offering his opinion denying Congress’s right to examine these gifts, in an “interview” with the lawyer defending his buddy and fixer Leonard Leo in our investigation about Alito’s gifts.
It is worsened when the pretense of legitimacy puts Alito and Thomas on cases from which they should have been recused or offered legitimate, official explanations.
It is worsened by their adherence to instruction delivered to them by the billionaires via front groups that file “amicus” briefs at the Court in coordinated flotillas, without disclosing their connections. The pattern is stunning.
It’s worsened when the billionaires behind the gifts and flotillas are the billionaires who orchestrated putting these justices on the Court, using more front groups and gobs of dark money and their spidery organizer Leonard Leo.
It is worsened by omertà from all their colleagues, and utter administrative failure to rein in the rogue justices, virtually no matter what. Impunity breeds arrogance and corruption. Silence becomes complicity.
And it is dramatically worsened when the Court, uniquely in the land, allows no inquiry or investigation about what the facts are, so that these justices can just call themselves safe on base when it’s plain to all that they are out, out, out.
No facts; no justice. Just fog and tap dance. Enough.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenWhitehouse

May 26
Rich how Exxon or anyone in fossil fuel industry has the nerve to complain about political conspiracies, or partisan state attorneys general doing others’ bidding. That’s a lot of projection, I’d say. 🧵
wsj.com/science/enviro…
Look at the massive array of fossil-fuel funded front groups through which the industry does its dirty work, dozens of them, which we have to fight every day in the climate wars.
Look at the U.S. Chamber, co-opted with secret fossil fuel money to become a “worst climate obstructor.”
Read 6 tweets
May 21
The Alito “insurrection flag” incident is bad enough (even Republicans have spoken out, which re: our captured Court is rare to see).

Worse, it’s not an isolated incident over at the Roberts Court.

🧵
Last year, Alito gave an “interview” on WSJ ed page where he (a) opined on a matter likely to come before the Court, (b) on a matter in active dispute, (c) with a lawyer on one side of that dispute (d) while Alito and a friend had direct personal interest in the outcome.
(The dispute was over the ability of Congress to investigate and subpoena a friend of Alito’s for information about undisclosed billionaire gifts to the justice, and billionaire donors’ lawyers quickly quoted Alito’s comments. Self-help.)
Read 9 tweets
May 17
So the Alito Family flies a “Stop-the-Steal”-signifying, upside-down United States flag at their house, and he says nothing when insurrection-related cases start to come before the Supreme Court.

In fiction, they’d say that it “jumped the shark.” But it happened.

🧵
This is not just bad taste; it flat-out breaks the Court’s rule against political displays, and it suggests predisposition in those cases, which in turn suggests recusal is in order.
Then Alito blames it on his wife’s anger at a neighbor’s allegedly inappropriate behavior.

First off, not so great putting your wife under the bus.

Second, judges are supposed to exhibit judicial temperament (except, remember Kavanaugh’s meltdown?).
Read 13 tweets
May 15
Midst all the mischief at the United States Supreme Court, it’s almost gone unnoticed how many of its key decisions are being manipulated with fake facts, outside the established traditions of American judicial fact-finding.

🧵
Justifiable attention has gone to justices accepting large gratuities from billionaires with interests before the Court, and to the Court’s refusal to adopt a meaningful ethics code.
But not enough attention has been given to the Court’s repeated violation of established fact-finding rules to accomplish the billionaires’ right-wing agenda.
Read 19 tweets
May 13
Let’s see how Supreme Court justices caught receiving unreported gifts fare, compared to executive and legislative officials.

Short answer: very different — justices aren’t even subject to basic fact-finding. Highest court; lowest standard.

🧵
Recap: Round One of yacht/jet travel gifts from Harlan Crow to Clarence Thomas went to Judicial Conference, which should refer credible questions of ”willfulness” to Attorney General.
Makes sense: AG has investigative resources, judicial back-scratching less likely, AG can see if other crimes implicated. Result then: no referral, no public report.
Read 20 tweets
Apr 26
Well, the FedSoc justices pretty much disgraced themselves and their fake pet theories in yesterday’s oral argument on presidential immunity.🧵
Remember when they were “minimalists”? Yesterday they embarked on a long policy peregrination so as to make what Gorsuch called a “ruling for the ages.” (He actually said that.) Behind the stunning pomposity, it’s miles from “minimalist.”
Remember when they were “constitutionalists”? The constitution says they’ve got to stick to the “case or controversy” before them, and yet they went on their wild hypothetical wanderings. Some “constitutionalists.”
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(