John Sailer Profile picture
May 28, 2024 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Do universities discriminate against white candidates? Yes. Especially when hiring professors focused on identity/social justice.

These positions give universities plausible deniability for race-based hiring, which is common in academia.

I have receipts. 🧵 Image
It’s worth remembering the academic job market’s total saturation in positions focused on race, identity, and social justice.

Things like "indigenous Siberian studies" and classics with a focus on "race, racism, and Greek & Roman studies."

Image
Image
Image
This has entirely skewed certain disciplines. A grad student looking at a field like, say, German studies will be able to put two and two together.

There are hardly any jobs out there, and the jobs that are out there tend to fit a specific theme.

If you’re a historian, well...
Image
Image
A grad student in the shoes of David Austin Walsh might think they have the right formula: even if you’re a white guy, just specialize in the right things, then you'll have at least a shot.

That is verifiably incorrect.

Universities very explicitly say these race/identity/social justice jobs exist to target specific groups. They get very close to openly declaring their intention to discriminate in the hiring process.
I've repeatedly found search committees openly admit to using racial preferences.

Ohio State sought a professor of French studies with a "specialization in Black France."

The search committee stated that hiring a “visible minority” was a key priority—so they only invited black candidates for on campus interviews.Image
The University of Washington conducted a search for a professor focused on diversity.

A white woman was the search committee's first choice.

A diversity committee member objected on the grounds of race.

They then re-ranked the candidates.
Image
Image
Here's the University of Washington diversity advisory committee member noting that it's "optically-speaking" a bad look that the offer to go to a white woman. Image
This is the goal of "cluster hiring," hiring multiple candidates at once w/ a focus on DEI, increasingly popular in academia.

In the sciences, that means heavily weighing DEI statements. But in the humanities, it commonly involves hiring w/ a race/identity/social justice focus. Image
A professor friend recently told me that everyone in his university system acts like cluster hiring is just a legal form of racial quotas.

But again, we don't have to rely on rumors. Administrators have literally said that's exactly what they're doing.


Image
We have the worst of both worlds.

Our universities contort entire academic disciplines, narrowly focusing on social justice, applying de facto ideological weed-out tools like diversity statements—all for the sake of achieving (or masking) racial preferences.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Sailer

John Sailer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDSailer

Apr 9
Princeton President Chris Eisgruber argues: Trump’s demands violate academic freedom, the admin is using science funding to influence policies that have nothing to do with science (e.g. admissions policies).

It's hard to take this completely seriously. Here's why: (🧵) Image
The federal government constantly uses its funding “clout” to elicit university policies. Most recently, this has come in the form of heavy handed diversity requirements, which of course involves admissions policies.

As far as I know, Eisgruber has never raised the issue. 2/
To give just one example: at the NIH, large scale training grants (T32s) have long required applicants to submit special plans on enhancing diversity, which have to meet a certain scoring threshold for the project to be funded. Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 3
Trump is hurling earth-shaking threats at America’s universities. The response from elite opinion leaders has been fascinating, if you read between the lines.

The pattern is: denounce Trump’s actions, but also, in a way, vindicate them. The New York Times is a good example.

🧵
The NYT editorial board declares: now is the time for universities to defend themselves.

But also, universities have valued ideology over truth-seeking (i.e. their basic mission). They've silenced debate. They've ostracized political outsiders. Image
Image
David Leonhardt says: Trump is borrowing from the Modi/Putin/Erdogan playbook.

But also, universities (even community colleges!) have acted in a way that’s “inconsistent with their mission." Editor Patrick Healy adds a story about required campus orthodoxies. Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 2
LaVelle Ridley, a professor at Ohio State, uses research to push an "anti-capitalist, prison abolitionist agenda."

Ridley’s career is worth examining. It illustrates how much cash goes toward scholar-activism—especially cash from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
As an undergrad, Ridley was a Schomburg-Mellon Humanities Fellow, a diversity-focused research and mentoring program with a decent stipend.

Run through the New York Public Library. Funded by the Mellon Foundation. Image
As a PhD student, Ridley received the University of Michigan’s Rackham Merit Fellowship, a diversity-focused tuition and stipend program. Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Apr 2
NEW: A scholar pushing a "prison abolitionist agenda." A "neuroqueercrip" student studying decolonization. A working group on "tribal critical race theory."

Each is funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation—a driving force behind the scholar-activist pipeline.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
2/ Andrew Mellon made his mark on American politics a century ago as Treasury secretary.

In my latest, I describe how today his foundation injects identity politics into our universities and—most notably—bankrolls the career development of activist scholars. Image
3/ Throughout this series, I’ve shown how fellow-to-faculty hiring schemes are especially clever because they help administrators bypass normal hiring procedures.

As dozens of documents show, this is a favored tool of the Mellon Foundation. Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 1
For a few years I’ve reported on how universities use DEI statements to screen faculty hires—a huge issue for academic freedom.

It’s safe to say: we won the debate. In two years, opinion has shifted dramatically. This month, the UC System nixed the practice.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
For me, covering the policy underscored what you can accomplish through solid reporting.

Again and again, when I managed to show what the policy looked like in practice—what happened behind the scenes—it moved the needle.

I'm putting some key examples in this 🧵of 🧵s. Image
Image
Image
Image
Texas Tech. Texas Tech’s biology department decided to require and heavily weigh diversity statements in all of its faculty hires.

I acquired its evaluations. Predictably, they penalized scientists for failing to repeat progressive shibboleths.

Image
Read 26 tweets
Mar 31
Notable reporting from Emily Kopp. A study purported to show that mortality is higher for black infants seen by white doctors. By now, the issues with this study are widely known.

FOIAed notes show how the authors in fact cut points that they said "undermined the narrative." Image
Image
As I told @emilyakopp, the study illustrates a vicious cycle. Health equity research justifies DEI policies, which elicit more health equity research. Eventually, a bunk study might end up cited in a dissenting opinion for the country's highest court. Image
@emilyakopp Here's the article. dailycaller.com/2025/03/31/exc…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(