Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
May 29, 2024 18 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Good morning from New York.

After a Manhattan judge delivers his instructions, a jury of Trump's peers will begin a historic process: deliberations to determine whether to convict a former U.S. president of felonies.

As always, I will be reporting live from the courtroom. 🧵
Trump has entered the courtroom, followed by his entourage.

The daily photography session has begun.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who has appeared only occasionally, is not in the courtroom this morning.
"All rise."

The jury is entering, and some appear more dressed up than usual — ready to work.

Justice Merchan tells them that he will now instruct them on the law.
Merchan notes that none of his rulings should suggest that he has an opinion about this case, and if any of them has that impression, they should disregard it.

"You are the judges of the facts."
Merchan gives the usual analogy for circumstantial evidence.

If jurors fell asleep, and they woke up to find the sidewalk is wet, they may conclude that it rained overnight.

(Another variation of this analogy is jurors seeing someone shaking a wet umbrella inside the court.)
Merchan reiterates that evidence about AMI's non-prosecution agreement can help jurors gauge David Pecker's credibility and learn context, not to determine Trump's guilt or innocence.

So too with the FEC investigation and Cohen's guilty plea for FECA offenses, the judge adds.
Next instruction, summarized:

The WSJ articles can be used only for the fact of their publication and what happened in the aftermath of the printing, but the reported facts inside the articles aren't evidence.
Merchan:

"The burden of proof never shifts from the People to the Defendant."

If the jury finds the People didn't carry that burden, they must acquit, but they must convict if they find prosecutors met it.

He moves on to the concept of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Merchan notes that reasonable doubt doesn't require absolute certainty of guilt, but it's not enough to find the defendant is "probably" guilty.

"You should be guided solely by a full and fair evaluation of the evidence."
Merchan instructs jurors on how to evaluate witness credibility — again, with highly typical instructions on how they can use their own judgment on when to disregard testimony in full or in part if they believe a witness has lied.
Merchan defines a "thing of value" under FECA, under federal election law, before moving on to the press exemption for the "normal" and "legitimate press function."
Merchan moves on to another prosecution theory of "unlawful means" under New York election law: falsifying other business records.

These go beyond the indictment's 34 checks, invoices and ledger entries. They include the bank records for the shell companies used in the payoffs.
Merchan instructs that the tax fraud offenses do not require proof of an underpayment of taxes.
What matters, Merchan notes, is the submission of false documents to tax authorities.
Merchan reviews the law of the press exception again.
Merchan informs jurors that their verdict must be unanimous.
After the judge finishes his instruction, the attorneys meet for a sidebar.
Merchan has sent the jurors to begin their deliberations.

When they leave for the deliberations room, the judge praises the alternates for their time and attention but does not excuse them yet.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Feb 9
A hearing in the case of J.G.G. v. Trump is about to begin:

Judge Boasberg will consider what relief is available to immigrants whisked out of the U.S. in March 2025 without notice or a hearing.

Some background below the main story here at All Rise News buff.ly/zSMY14B
ACLU's Lee Galernt on the Trump DOJ's recalcitrance:

"It seems that no matter what we propose, the government is not going to accept."
Galernt says that he's never seen a Justice Department brief end with veiled threat like this.

Boasberg quips: "I’m used to that tone in this case, unfortunately." If, over Defendants’ vehement legal and practical objections, the Court issues an injunction, Defendants intend to immediately appeal, and will seek a stay pending appeal from this Court (and, if necessary, from the D.C. Circuit).
Read 9 tweets
Jan 26
A hearing is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. CT (10 a.m. ET) on the state of Minnesota's request to halt the ICE surge in the Twin Cities.

I'm covering the proceedings remotely.

From the state's memo:

buff.ly/ub2bHsoThe balance of the equities tips sharply in Plaintiffs’ favor. Plaintiffs seek to protect their sovereignty as well as their residents’ health, welfare, and safety. Plaintiffs also seek to retain control over local law enforcement, education, and public safety. At bottom, Plaintiffs seek to protect fundamental principles of American federalism from Defendants’ unprecedented intrusion. The public is in no way benefited from such unlawful or unconstitutional activity and there is substantial public interest in “Americans trusting their own government to follow the rule of law.” ... On the oth...
From lawyers for the state and the Twin Cities.

"We need the Court to act to stop this Surge before yet another resident dies because of Operation Metro Surge." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
"All rise."

Judge Katherine M Menendez presiding.

The lawyers enter their appearances.
Read 68 tweets
Jan 21
Reps. Khanna and Massie:

The judges presiding over the Epstein and Maxwell dockets have "inherent authority" to appoint a special master to release the files, and Trump DOJ's actions show why.

Doc buff.ly/FMAEr5t

Background buff.ly/ZFi3a36

Key passage and quick threadIn apparent conflict with its argument that no court can enforce the Act, the Government has publicly blamed the Court for its failure to comply with the Act. The Government is proverbially speaking out both sides of its mouth and, in doing so, is attempting to use the Court in a manner that brings shame and disgrace to the vaunted criminal justice system in this country.
As more survivors join the fight for courts to appoint a "special master" overseeing the release of the Epstein files, the courts confront procedural hurdles.

One of the judges asked:

Who has standing for the request?

Do judges have the authority?

The new brief answers:
The Congressmen "do not require standing," the brief says.

Khanna and Massie are *amici* advising the judges of their inherent powers, which Trump's DOJ conceded by shifting blame for delays to the court in this press release dated two days after the deadline. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 14
An emergency hearing is scheduled to begin shortly in @RepJoeNeguse v. ICE, challenging Kristi Noem reinstating a seven-day advanced notice policy for congressional visits to detention centers.

A federal judge blocked that policy last month.

Background buff.ly/r0Nr0YAImage
See for the linked article at the top of the thread for the breakdown on the legal issues.

Judge Cobb says that the issue before her today is which funds the government is using on ICE facilities: Section 527 or Trump's mammoth spending bill.
If they're using Section 527 funds, they're in violation of the judge's stay order.

Lawyers for the House Dems say it's clear that they are.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 18, 2025
Closing arguments are about to begin in the trial of Judge Hannah Dugan. I'm reporting live from the courtroom.

Catch up with my coverage of the defense case on All Rise News.

Follow along here buff.ly/yddYCRo
As always, the government's up first:

"On this first day in this courtroom, you took an oath: Just like the defendant did."

[...]

"What happens when someone with the highest duty to uphold the law decides that it doesn't apply to her?"
Prosecutor Kelly Brown Watzka:

"It undermines the entire justice system."

"Imagine what would happen if every judge decided which law to obey or follow."
Read 41 tweets
Dec 18, 2025
Good morning from Milwaukee.

After the government rested, Judge Dugan’s lawyers moved for an acquittal: A key prosecution witness testified that Dugan personally directed her and her client to where federal agents were waiting.

Recap, on All Rise News allrisenews.com/p/dugan-govern…Image
You can read the full defense motion for an acquittal here. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
"All rise."

The defense case is about to begin with witness testimony.

The jury is entering.
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(