1. Across the country, inspired by Trump, Republican legislators have passed laws restricting how teachers can discuss race and gender
This week, a federal judge struck down one such law as unconstitutional, citing the experience of a high school teacher who showed her class the music video for Beyoncé's Formation
🧵
2. In 2021, New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu (R) signed a new law, modeled after a Trump executive order, that prohibited government employees, including public school teachers, from promoting "divisive concepts."
3. The law was passed in response to a panic about Critical Race Theory infiltrating schools.
But instead of banning CRT and related concepts like structural racism and implicit bias, the law banned instruction on a series of vague and inscrutable topics
4. The law, however, does not define key terms. Does a classroom discussion of various views count as "instruction"? Does a lesson on affirmative action violate the ban on instruction suggesting a person "should be discriminated against… solely or partly… because of his or her… race"? Teachers were left to guess.
5. Teachers who violated the new law could have their license revoked, ending their careers
A number of educational groups sued. On Tuesday, a federal judge struck down the law as unconstitutionally vague, saying it violated the 14th Amendment
6. The judge cited the experience of New Hampshire high school teacher Alison O’Brien.
O'Brien showed her class two music videos “Formation” by Beyoncé and “This is America” by Childish Gambino — as part of a unit on the Harlem Renaissance.
O'Brien said she showed the videos as part of a lesson where students "listen to Strange Fruit by Billie Holiday, read poetry, and study paintings by Harlem Renaissance artists."
Then, O'Brien asked the students if they saw "any connections between these two modern music videos and the art and culture of the Harlem Renaissance." O'Brien explained in a declaration filed as part of a lawsuit that using "modern examples of artists that students are aware of helps them to make connections to historical events such as the Harlem Renaissance in a manner that is relevant to them so they can better understand, analyze, and critique the information."
7. A parent filed a complaint, saying that O'Brien violated New Hampshire's "divisive content" law. The parent claimed the music videos were "offensive," too focused "on the oppression of just one group," and were "not a balanced view of history.”
8. O'Brien was summoned to the principal's office in the middle of one of her classes and told she was under investigation by the state Department of Education.
For "context" she was handed a printout of an op-ed written by New Hampshire Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut.
9. In the op-ed, Edelblut does not actually discuss the divisive concepts law. But Edelbut asserts that certain "activist educators" are "knowingly dismantling the foundations of a value system" built by parents. Edelblut's op-ed linked to a 68-page document of emails, classroom materials, and text messages that he says are examples of inappropriate classroom instruction. There is no explanation of how any of this relates to New Hampshire law.
10. The investigation into O'Brien became known to her colleagues. One "decided not to show a clip from a popular TV show because she did not want to face the same kind of scrutiny." O'Brien never heard anything further from the Department of Education or received an explanation as to why the videos might have violated the law.
11. The judge ruled that the law was unconstitutional. He said it represents "viewpoint-based restrictions on speech" but does not "provide either fair warning to educators of what they prohibit or sufficient standards...to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement."
1. A civics training for teachers created by the Florida Dep't of Education likens a Canadian psychology board sanctioning @jordanbpeterson to the systematic mass murder of dissidents in Stalin's Soviet Union
Teachers should tell students that both actions are motivated by the same ideology
2. The linking of "cancel culture" to the murder of hundreds of thousands is part of a new curriculum on "the dangers and evils of Communism."
@RonDeSantis signed a bill in April that will make this mandatory for all Florida public school students
1. The Florida Department of Education is training thousands of teachers to indoctrinate students in the tenets of Christian nationalism
We have receipts 🧾
Follow along for details
🧵
2. A three-day training course on civic education, conducted throughout Florida in the summer of 2023, included a presentation on the "Influences of the Judeo-Christian Tradition" on the founding of the United States.
According to speaker notes accompanying one slide, teachers were told that "Christianity challenged the notion that religion should be subservient to the goals of the state," and the same hierarchy is reflected in America's founding documents.
3. The next slide in the deck quotes an article by Peter Lillback, the president of Westminster Theological Seminary and the founder of The Providence Forum, an organization that promotes and defends Christian nationalism.
The group's executive director, Jerry Newcombe, writes a weekly column for World Net Daily — a far-right site known for publishing hundreds of stories falsely suggesting Obama was a Muslim born in Africa.
1. @tomemmer (R-MN), the @GOPMajorityWhip, issued a scathing statement condemning out-of-state college protesters, accusing them of anti-semitism
On Saturday, @mngop endorsed Royce White, an anti-Semite, to be the party's nominee for US Senate
What has Emmer said?
Nothing
2. In April 2022, Royce White wrote on his Substack that the faith of many Jewish people has been replaced by "materialism" and "a survivalist impulse that can give birth to the darkest of intentions and most grandiose effort for world control."
3. White defended Ye after the rapper praised Hitler in 2022. At the time, White criticized Jews for focusing on the Holocaust "to provide a victimhood cover for their own corrupt practices." White later praised Ye for speaking out against "the Jewish lobby."
1. On Monday, a federal judge dropped an extraordinarily important decision.
It has received ZERO media attention.
In 1871, Congress passed the Ku Klux Klan Act, which allowed people to sue law enforcement officers who violated their Constitutional rights. It was intended to curb white supremacist violence against Black Americans.
In 1967, the Supreme Court flipped it on its head.
They "interpreted" the Ku Klux Klan Act to provide "qualified immunity" to law enforcement officers who violate Constitutional rights in "good faith." It has allowed law enforcement officers who abuse their power to escape accountability.
A federal judge, Carlton Reeves, just issued a powerful ruling urging the Supreme Court to acknowledge its mistake and repeal the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Follow along if interested.
🧵
2. Here are the basics of the case before Reeves:
On February 13, 2020, Nicholas Robertson was shot in Jackson, Mississippi.
Two months later, Samuel Jennings was arrested for burglary and grand larceny in an unrelated incident.
Jennings provided Thomas with a rambling written statement pinning the blame for Robertson's murder on a man named Desmond Green.
Thomas used this uncorroborated statement to convince a grand jury to indict Green for murder.
3. For 22 months, Green was held in a jail "full of violence, rodents, and moldy food." According to Green, he "often did not have a mattress, or even a pad, to sleep on." Green said he "constantly feared for his life."
3. Even generic terms that might encompass "woke" topics appear in relatively few syllabi. The term "race" — allegedly an obsession of the modern university — appears in only 2.8% of the syllabi in 2023
1. Trump has already violated his gag order 10 times by attacking the jury, witnesses, and the judge's daughter.
Now, his acolytes are flocking to NYC, launching the same attacks.
They appear to be reading from a common script.
It's almost like someone is orchestrating it.
2. The gag order against Trump specifically prohibits Trump from "directing others to make public statements" on his behalf that violate the gag order.
If Trump directed his acolytes to attack the judge's daughter, it could constitute criminal contempt
3. Asked on Tuesday if he directed the Republicans to speak about the trial on his behalf, Trump described them as his "surrogates" and praised them for "speaking very beautifully."
Trump has also entered the courthouse flanked by his surrogates, effectively giving them his imprimatur.