🧵 I've been digging into this, and it's pretty clear that part of this campaign against Graham Phillips is driven by an article on a fake news website that appears to be run by John Mark Dougan himself.
I'm not sure where this all started, but the first time the spat appears to have gone public is this post by Graham Phillips about John Mark Dougan, stating "Dougan is accused of having 'gone rogue', and suspected of having taken money from western agencies." t.me/grahamwphillip…
The following day, John Mark Dougan posted this now deleted Telegram post, making various allegations and linking to an article on a site called "ukpoliticking", published on the same day. t.me/BadVolfNews/16…
The article was swiftly deleted from the website, but archived, and contains various allegations against Graham Phillips, which seems to be a mishmash of old allegations and what appear to be made up quotes. I'll note these are unproven allegations. web.archive.org/web/2024053114…
We'll come back to that site later. Next Graham Phillips reshared a Telegram post attacking John Mark Dougan for running fake news websites, something that's been widely reported in the media. nbcnews.com/news/us-news/f…
Then on June 1st John Mark Dougan responded by posting allegations (which I'll remind everyone are unproven) about Graham, and specifics about the allegations. t.me/BadVolfNews/16…
So, back to the ukpoliticking site, which is made up of multiple articles that are either stolen from other websites, or written using AI, including articles on the profile of "Ivy Thompson", the supposed author of the deleted article about Graham ukpoliticking.com/author/ivy-tho…
But there's an interesting connection between Ivy Thompson's work and another fake news site. First, let's look at this Ivy Thompson article, published a week ago: ukpoliticking.com/2024/05/26/ukr…
Like many articles written by Ivy Thompson, they have a perfect or near perfect score on GPTZero, and a bit of digging shows a lot of similarities with the content of an article published on Sky News, likely what the AI was asked to rewrite uk.news.yahoo.com/russia-produci…
If you Google the exact text in the opening of each article, you'll only find two sets of results, the occasional original article where they didn't bother to get AI to rewrite them, and results for a site called GB Geopolitics.
Thanks to M2X on the Bellingcat Discord for finding an archived copy of the Great British Geopolitics site that is clearly identical to the site. But why is GB Geopolitics important? ukpoliticking.com
As this thread explains, GB Geopolitics is part of a network of websites with alleged links to John Mark Dougan.
It's been brought to my attention that there's videos published on social media claiming I've made various statements about the US election, related to election integrity. These are part of a Russian disinformation campaign, and the quotes are fabricated, but it's nice to know the Russians hold the value of my opinions in such high regard.
I've previously discussed other videos in this campaign in the below thread:
🧵 1/7: The European Court of Human Rights has ruled in favor of Russian NGOs and media groups (including @Bellingcat), declaring Russia's "foreign agent" legislation a violation of fundamental human rights. The court found that the law imposes undue restrictions on freedom of expression & association.
2/7: The law requires NGOs & individuals receiving foreign funds to register as “foreign agents,” facing stigma, harsh reporting requirements, and severe penalties. This label implies foreign control—without proof—and misleads the public
3/7: The Court noted that the "foreign agent" label, linked to spies & traitors, damages the reputation of those designated and leads to a chilling effect on civil society and public discourse.
It's currently 9:11am, this post has 3 views, and no retweets or likes on an account with 75 followers. Let's see how long it takes for it to get several hundred retweets, and a few tens of thousands of views.
In the last 15 minutes, that tweet just gained 15.7k views, 187 likes, with no retweets. Two other tweets with similarly fake stores, posted around the same time, with similar profiles, have also suddenly gain a couple of hundred likes and around the same amount of views. This is, in real time, how a Russian disinformation campaign is using Twitter to promote its fake stories.
The thing is, nearly all of this engagement, apart from about 10 views and none of the likes, are entirely inauthentic. This doesn't help them reach genuine audiences, it's just boosting their stats so when they report back to their paymasters they can tell them how many views, likes and retweets they got, but they're all fake. It's effectively the people running these campaigns scamming their paymasters to make them think it's working, when it's not at all.
A new fake Bellingcat story, from a fake video claiming to be from Fox News. What's interesting about this one is I viewed the tweet 10 minutes ago, and it had 5 views, and suddenly it jumped to 12.5k, then 16.2k views in less than 5 minutes, with zero retweets or likes.
To me this suggests there's a bot network being used to boost views of tweets used in this disinformation campaign.
In 90 seconds this tweet just gained 154 retweets, another sign of bot activity.
It's clear this is a coordinated attack from pro-Orban media which they really don't want being noticed outside of Hungary, but what they don't seem to realise is I'm now going to use what they did at every presentation I do on disinformation to audiences across the world.
What's notable is the accusations made against Bellingcat were all taken (uncredited) from an article publishing by MintPress claiming we've loads of intelligence agents working for us, which even the original MintPress article fails to prove.
Which to me just means I get to add a couple more slides to the presentation I'll be doing about this, to audiences made up of exactly the sort of people they didn't want to find out about this.
State actors see alternative media ecosystems as a vehicle for promoting their agendas, and take advantage of that by not just covertly funding them, but also giving them access to their officials and platforming them at places like the UN.
A recent example of that is Jackson Hinkle going to Eastern Ukraine, then getting invited to the UN by Russia to speak at a press conference, and that footage being used by state media as evidence of "experts" rejecting the "mainstream narratives" on Ukraine.
A lack of transparency around the funding of the individuals and websites that are part of these alternative media ecosystems allows for state actors to get away with their covert influence, a clear example of which we've seen over the last 24 hours.