Simon Ateba Profile picture
Jun 3 1 tweets 4 min read Read on X
BREAKING - MUST WATCH: This was perhaps the most EXPLOSIVE exchange today between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Congressman Rich McCormick (@RepMcCormick), a medical doctor who treated patients during COVID but was censored for pointing out the science.

He told Fauci, "You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Specter that you believed institutions should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated." WATCH

Question: Someone said only politicians, only bloggers, only conspiracy theorists are disagreeing with you. I want to point out that I'm probably the only member of Congress that actually treated patients during the pandemic.

From the very beginning to the very end of the pandemic, during night shifts in the ER, thousands of patients during that time and in 2020 I was censored.

My medical license was threatened because I disagreed with bureaucrats, literally taken off the Internet as a person who is treating patients with leading edge technologies, developing theories, but doing my very best, but being censored by the United States government for the first time, stepping in and taking the place of medical professionals as the experts in healthcare.

Any dissent surrounding COVID-19 treatments, mask mandates, and any public policy surrounding the pandemic was immediately labeled as anti-science.

I watched as public health officials and politicians told my patients what treatment options were best for them, regardless of their comorbidities or their medical history.

Despite my education and my training and my experience, my opinions were relegated to conspiracy and misinformation by so-called healthcare experts who had never treated a patient throughout the entire pandemic.

This has been a black eye on the medicine and has highlighted why government should never, never insert itself in between patients and their healthcare providers.

The American people deserve to make medical decisions through conversations with their physicians rather than politically motivated mandates.

Question: Doctor Fauci, did you ever treat a patient for COVID during the pandemic?

Answer: I was part of a team that was at the NIH that took care. We didn't take care of many of them.

Question: Okay, so not hands-on. Got it. Thank you. Why would I be criticized by a bureaucrat for doing my very best as a healthcare professional? This is a rhetorical question, but why? Why would the government, who has never treated a patient for COVID... You can read all the things you want, but you're not there. You're not seeing patients. You're not watching people die. Intubating patients right there with that disease in your face, watching it happen, watching the development of this disease and actually learning from it. But I'm being told by bureaucrats what's right and wrong. And what's funny is everything I was censored on, I was proven to be right. Pretty crazy, isn't it?

Question: You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Specter that you believed institutions should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Could we run the audio clip on that, please?

Answer: You think it can be done about it. I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory. I know federal officials don't like to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get vaccinated, lady. You're going to get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are going to say, you want to work for us? You get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated. Thank you.

Question: Are all objections to COVID vaccinations ideological bullshit, Doctor Fauci?

Answer: No, they're not. And that's not what I was referring to.

Question: Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context, and I take great offense to this. Miss Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, which came from recommendations from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician, on how to get pregnant, and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, wanted to get pregnant, and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes. But she was fired because you made it hard, just like you said in your statement, because you didn't want to make sure that the ideological bullshit got in the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her healthcare professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self-determine as we're all given God-given rights. Shame on you, Doctor Fauci. You've become doctor of fear. Americans do not hate science. I don't hate science. The American people hate having their freedoms taken from them. You inspired and created fear through mask mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institutions. This fear you created will continue to have ripple effects over generations to come. You have already seen its effects in education, in the economy, and everything else, quite frankly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Ateba

Simon Ateba Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @simonateba

Jan 7
MADNESS. Investor @BillAckman who when went after Claudine Gay crazily claims family should be off-limits. This is the craziest thing that I have read today. For years, we've been talking about Hunter Biden and connecting his alleged corrupt business dealings to his father, President Joe Biden. Ackman's wife @NeriOxman is accused of multiple instances of plagiarism, receiving Jeffrey Epstein's gifts, and questionable relationships with other people, including an actor. I believe the guy should just chill and allow the facts to come out. The CIA calls it blowback. When you go after others rightly or wrongly, they will fight back. If the president's son is caught with cocaine, who do you think would be the focus? His son or the president?

Ackman wrote, "It has been the case since as far as I can remember in business and in media that family was off limits, unless of course the family is directly involved in the business.

"The code of the road was that you can attack the protagonist as much as you want, but not his wife and not his kids.

"The same is true in business dealings. You never go after someone’s family to get at a business person. This is a sacred code that I have never seen violated.

"Business Insider broke this sacred code on Thursday and again on Friday when they went after my wife, @NeriOxman. And they are working on another story about her. They are calling her former students as we speak."Image
Once you begin to or try to justify plagiarism or other stuff because the person is black, white, brown, or your wife, your husband, your child, and your sister, people would begin to question your own character. Remember, this is just the beginning, it may get worse!
Also, for those claiming you don't go after the wife. How many times have journalists gone after Melania? If they find something on her, like fraud, plagiarism, or anything else, won't they use it to damage Trump? Of course, they will.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(