The multigenerational California cultural crisis is finally at the front door of our little town. My wife has to avoid certain places now with the kids because of a growing DEI customer base. House goes up for sale this week.
Local gas station bought up by Dots. No one knows them. They don’t put up Fourth of July decorations. Did nothing for Memorial Day. Play subversive rap music. Zero interest in conversation.
Many people have messaged me after this. From all across the United States. They have noted to me how much their country does not look like what they grew up with. Heritage Americans are waking up to the fact that they have been conned by an internationalist ideology. They want their country back. They want their homes back. This is not a fringe thing. Millions are being sentimentally mobilized. Political action is coming.
Why are so many people messaging me saying they’ve experienced the same thing?
I think a lot of people are seeing that they are losing their way of life and the world they grew up in. Beyond ideology, there exists a recognition that America is undergoing a sustained revolution, and managed transformation.
Heritage Americans cannot be gaslit much longer. They know the world is being changed forcefully by the political decision to open the borders.
The Paleocons were right. America is being transformed and demographic changes, which are politically sourced, is playing a major role
“Nothing in the Constitution has given them [the federal judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. . . . The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.” (Letter to Abigail Adams, September 11, 1804)
The original error [was in] establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will.” (Letter to John Wayles Eppes, 1807)
I regret to inform you that the activist journos are at it again. Herein, Phil (who has trouble remembering how to spell my last name) pretends to bring “receipts” to the table, but all he ends up doing is vindicating those who understand that legacy media is in a state of serious embarrassment. 🧵
Let me not bury the lead here: basically, Phil thought it was a good idea to come to a small town where I have been living peaceably for the last five months, bring out helicopters and camera crews and convince everybody that I am part of a Nazi-adjacent conspiracy. Seriously. Like Gaston whipping up the village into a frenzy he associated us with images like this:
There are no receipts offered with regard to this actually dangerous accusation in what follows (and yes, the death threat has been reported)--the media has been calling Trump and his 75+ million supporters Nazis for a year now.
You were told that removing a few statues wasn’t a big deal. It wasn’t about liquidating a heritage, memory holing the collective experience of a people, humiliating a culture. It was a peace offering in a changing world.
One of the things I've come under fire for lately is some critical remarks about the socio-political character of the overall South Asian (Indian in particular) community in America. This is actually a topic that comes up a lot--informally--on the grassroots Right; because anecdotally, there seems to be considerable differences culturally between them as a group, and rural working class Americans who primarily constitute the core of Middle America.
I was curious about their voting habits as a group, after interacting with some folks here on Twitter and elsewhere. So I looked into it. In the below I share some of my findings.
In a recent well-funded study published by Carnegie, the conclusion was reached that Indians are "solidly with the Democrat Party" and in this direction, they "exhibit signs of significant political polarization." Even among all other categories of foreign-born citizens, Indians "tilt left" (Carnegie's wording) relative to other ethnic groups.
The contemporary Evangelical mind has adapted itself to the prevailing instincts of the therapeutic state. It can’t be exaggerated the extent to which distortions of Biblical themes characterize the subversion of the bourgeois American Evangelical. Thread I will add to over time:
They have corrupted the virtue of meekness into a lethargic moral passivity.
They have transformed the idea of non-partiality into a holistic denial of sociological priorities.
A lot of good people on the anti-Left side of things, especially those influenced by thinkers associated with the Mises Institute don’t understand why people like myself continue to bring up Classical Liberalism as problematic. After all, they rightly point out, the entire 20th
Century was a repudiation and revolution against classical liberalism. Liberalism, as people even like Paul Gottfried have pointed out, was sort of a myth since the latter half of the 19th century. First the Progressive movement and then the formalization of those impulses in the
Managerial Revolution of the 1930s rendered liberalism truly a thing of the past. So why then is classical liberalism still brought up today by many on the Right (like myself)? Here is how I would answer this: classical liberalism is not brought up because it describes our system