David Sacks Profile picture
Jun 7, 2024 1 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Why I’m Backing President Trump

As many press accounts have reported, I’m hosting a fundraising event for President Donald J. Trump at my home in San Francisco this evening.

Over the last couple of years, I have hosted events for presidential candidates Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as several Congressional figures in both major parties. I give to many, but endorse few.

But today I am giving my endorsement to our 45th President, Donald J. Trump, to be our 47th President. My reasons rest on four main issues that I think are vital to American prosperity, security, and stability – issues where the Biden administration has veered badly off course and where I believe President Trump can lead us back.

1. The Economy

President Biden took over an economy that was already recovering strongly from the Covid-induced shock of Q2 2020. Demand had roared back, and employment had recovered. But he chose to keep priming the pump with unnecessary Covid stimulus – almost $2 trillion of it, passed on a straight party-line vote in March of 2021, with trillions more to follow for “infrastructure,” green energy, and “inflation reduction.”

Biden did this despite early warnings from former Clinton Treasury Secretary Larry Summers that it could lead to inflation. When the inflation came, the Biden administration dismissed it as “transitory.” In fact, inflation still remains persistently high even after the fastest interest-rate tightening cycle in memory.

As a result of Biden’s inflation, average Americans have lost roughly a fifth of their purchasing power over the last few years. Moreover, any American who needs a mortgage, car loan, or credit card debt faces much higher interest costs, which further constrain their purchasing power.

It’s no different for our federal government, which now must devote over a trillion dollars annually to interest on its $34 trillion debt, a massive sum that’s been growing by a trillion dollars every hundred days. This trajectory is unsustainable, yet Biden’s 2025 budget calls for even higher spending.

Growth has already slowed from 3.4 percent in the last quarter of 2023 to an anemic 1.3 percent in the first quarter of this year. We can’t afford another four years of Bidenomics.

2. Foreign Policy / Ukraine War

President Trump left office with ISIS defeated, the Abraham Accords signed, and no new wars raging on the global stage. Three and a half years later, the world is on fire. President Biden has made several strategic choices that have contributed to this situation.

In his first year in office, Biden unnecessarily alienated the Saudis before realizing that they are an indispensable partner in the Middle East. He also presided over a chaotic withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan (right policy, abysmal execution).

But his biggest blunder by far has been in Ukraine. His administration immediately began pushing for Ukraine’s admission to NATO, despite no unanimity among the existing NATO members that such a move was a good idea. When this predictably antagonized the Russians, the Biden administration doubled down at every turn, insisting that “NATO’s door is open, and will remain open” with respect to Ukraine. Biden himself baited Russia when he said he didn’t “accept anybody’s red lines.”

After the invasion, there was still a chance to stop the war in its early weeks before much loss of life and destruction had occurred. Russian and Ukrainian negotiators had signed a draft agreement in Istanbul that would have seen Russia retreat to its pre-invasion borders in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality. But the Biden administration rejected that deal as well as General Milley’s advice to seek a diplomatic solution in November 2022.

As the war of attrition grinds on, the Ukrainians face ever-mounting casualties and infrastructure damage. Still, President Biden keeps allowing the conflict to escalate and risk World War III. Every escalation that Biden initially resisted – Abrams tanks, F-16’s, ATACMs, allowing Ukraine to hit targets in Russia – he has eventually acquiesced to. There is just one more escalation to go: NATO troops on the ground fighting Russia directly. And our European allies like Emmanuel Macron are already spoiling for exactly this scenario.

With Biden, our choices are limited to fighting the proxy war to the last Ukrainian, or fighting Russia ourselves. President Trump has said he wants the dying in Ukraine to stop, and that he will seek to end the war through a negotiated settlement. Ukraine will no longer be able to get the deal we talked them out of in April 2022, but we can still save Ukraine as an independent nation and avert world war.

3. The Border

As an immigrant to the United States myself, I certainly believe in America’s history of strengthening its ranks by welcoming talented people from other nations seeking freedom and opportunity. But that promise requires an orderly process of legal immigration that emphasizes skills and the principles of American citizenship. This was the preferred policy under President Trump.

What Biden ushered in was a de facto open border policy. On his first day in office, he repealed President Trump’s executive orders restricting illegal immigration and stopped construction of a border wall, selling off parts of it for scrap metal. This quickly resulted in a massive spike in illegal border crossings and a chaotic and dangerous situation on our southern border.

President Biden (along with the hapless Kamala Harris and the malevolent Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas) responded to growing concerns by gaslighting the American public, saying there was no problem at the border despite constant videos of masses of people sprinting across it.

When the situation became too dire to ignore or deny, Biden claimed he didn’t have the executive authority to do anything about it and blamed Republicans for not sending him legislation. But this week, facing abysmal polling numbers on this issue, Biden suddenly discovered he has executive authority after all. The order he signed is a tepid, too little-too late effort to slow the tidal wave of illegal immigration in time for the election. But Biden has shown he is not serious on this issue. If he wins a second term, the open border policy will resume, and tens of millions more illegals will stream across the border.

4. Lawfare

A bedrock of the political stability we’ve enjoyed in America over the last 250 years is that we don’t accept attempts to jail political opponents in order to win an election. Yet Biden has pushed for selective and unprecedented prosecutions of his once and future opponent from the moment he assumed office.

Merrick Garland took a long look at the January 6 situation and didn’t see a path to prosecute Trump, even after a one-sided Congressional committee sent a highly-prejudiced referral to his Justice Department. Press stories then appeared describing Biden’s frustration with Garland’s reticence. The result was Jack Smith at the federal level and Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis at the state level. All have pursued cases based on novel legal theories heretofore unseen and designed to get Trump. In the NY case, Bragg resurrected a dead book-keeping misdemeanor into 34 felonies by claiming it was in the service of a second crime that he never defined and that the judge never insisted the jury unanimously agree on.

My immigration to this country as a young boy happened because my parents disagreed with the political system of their home country. That government sought to solve its political disagreements by imprisoning its political enemies. What a sad irony that the lawfare we escaped has now reared its ugly head in America of all places.

President Biden keeps insisting that a return of President Trump to the White House threatens democracy. But his administration is the one that has colluded with tech platforms to censor the Internet, used the intelligence community to cover up his son Hunter’s laptop, and pursued elective prosecutions against his political opponents.

Conclusion: The A/B Test

The voters have experienced four years of President Trump and four years of President Biden. In tech, we call this an A/B test. With respect to economic policy, foreign policy, border policy, and legal fairness, Trump performed better. He is the President who deserves a second term.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Sacks

David Sacks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidSacks

Jul 26, 2025
This was a historic week for AI policy. President Trump gave his first major speech on AI, the White House released its AI Action Plan, and President Trump signed three important executive orders. If you missed it, here is a recap of the major themes and actions. 🧵
1/ America is in an AI Race.

Reminiscent of the way that President John F. Kennedy declared the space race, President Trump declared that America is in an AI race. This competition will reshape the global economy and determine who will be the superpowers of the 21st century:

“Whether we like it or not, we are suddenly engaged in a fast-paced competition to build and refine this groundbreaking technology that will determine so much about the future of civilization.”

President Trump assured America that we will do “whatever it takes” to win this contest that is so vital to our future economic prosperity and national security:

“America is the country that started the AI race, and as President of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.”
2/ We win by out-innovating our competitors.

President Trump declared that innovation was the key to winning the AI race. “America must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with a green light, not strangled with red tape.”

As the AI industry is just getting started, President Trump made clear that he wanted to see it grow and thrive: “We’re going to make this industry absolutely the top because right now, it's a beautiful baby that's born. We have to grow that baby and let that baby thrive.”

President Trump promised to push back against state over-regulation, maintaining that we need one regulatory regime on AI, not 50 different ones. “You can’t have one state holding you up… We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states… We’re going to have one standard, one policy, one idea.”

Similarly, President Trump rejected onerous regulations by global institutions: “We also have to watch Europe, Asia, and all foreign countries so that they don't make rules and regulations that make it impossible for you to do business."

Finally, President Trump endorsed a common sense approach to intellectual property. He reaffirmed that AI models aren’t allowed to plagiarize outputs, but said that model training on inputs do not violate copyright law. “You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book, or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for. We appreciate that, but just can't do it—because it's not doable.”
Read 10 tweets
Jun 1, 2025
Republicans should understand that when Obama retweets hyperbolic and unproven claims about AI job loss, it’s not an accident, it’s part of an influence operation. The goal: to further “Global AI Governance,” a massive power grab by the bureaucratic state and globalist institutions. The organizers: “Effective Altruist” billionaires with a long history of funding left-wing causes and Trump hatred. Of course, it’s fine to be concerned about a technology as transformational as AI, but if you repeat their claims uncritically, you may be falling for an astroturfed campaign by the “AI Existential Risk Industrial Complex.”
To learn more about the “AI Existential Risk Industrial Complex,” this article does a good job exposing the agenda and who’s funding it:

open.substack.com/pub/aipanicnew…
This is another excellent article explaining how the “AI Existential Risk” ecosystem, with over a billion dollars in funding from a few left-wing Effective Altruism billionaires, expanded to encompass hundreds of organizations:

aipanic.news/p/the-doomers-…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 15, 2025
With Americans becoming exhausted with the Forever Wars in the Middle East, the “democracy promotion” grifters at USAID, NED, and the rest of the NGOs needed a new cause. Ukraine was perfect. As the most corrupt country in Europe, it would allow them to expropriate billions…
It’s no coincidence that the mass pardons for the Biden Family go back to 2014. That’s when Biden authorized the Maidan Coup and Hunter Biden was rewarded with a fake board seat at Burisma.
When Putin threatened to invade Ukraine in response to Biden’s insistence that it join NATO, it was a dream come true. War would allow expropriation on an unprecedented scale. Even Zelensky recently admitted a hundred billion is missing.
Read 4 tweets
May 18, 2024
On the latest episode of @theallinpod (29:40), I demoed @GlueAI using ChatGPT-4o. Much has already been written about the conversational and multimodal abilities of GPT-4o but I wanted to highlight how good the performance is for SaaS apps like Glue.🧵

Glue is a new work chat app that is based on threads rather than channels and makes AI a full-fledged member of the team. We created a new workspace for the All-In Pod and added all of our episode transcripts so the AI would have that context. Image
GlueAI (using ChatGPT-4o) did a remarkable job summarizing each Bestie's personality and contributions to the pod. (Glue shows clickable "Sources" for the AI's answers, which is nice.) Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 2, 2024
In 1991 the Soviet Union fell apart and NATO faced an existential crisis: its reason for being no longer existed. But rather than disband, it came up with a new mission: to expand. And in a self-referential loop, NATO expansion would create the hostility needed to justify itself.
Bureaucracies often take on a life of their own and end up causing the very problems they were supposed to solve.

NIH was supposed to prevent pandemics, so it funded gain-of-function research, causing a pandemic.

NATO was supposed to prevent a war, so it expanded to Russia’s border and sought to encircle it, provoking a war.
People outside the bureaucracy believe its job is to solve problems. People inside the bureaucracy understand that their job is to expand their power. That typically happens when problems get worse.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(