This is Johannah King-Slutzky, the Columbia grad student who demanded "humanitarian aid" for students protesting Israel on campus.
Have you wondered how a supposedly educated person could make such an absurd and tone-deaf request?
While many people go to college and receive a rigorous education, it entirely depends on the field of study.
This is Johannah’s focus in school:
This kind of academic jargon may sound impressive to a layperson, but it is actually intellectually bankrupt.
Jargon is often a hallmark of pseudoscience.
Charlatans frequently use jargon to deceive people into buying their snake oil - a term used to describe a scam.
Johannah’s academic focus belongs to a family of identity and culture-focused studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences. We call it activist scholarship.
It is a form of snake oil.
Influenced by Marxist Critical Theory and postmodern thought, activist scholarship focuses on power dynamics, and seeks to drive social change.
Other fields of study advance knowledge objectively, but activist scholarship uses knowledge selectively to advance specific social and political goals.
This approach is unscientific because it starts with a conclusion and looks for evidence to support it, leading to flawed research in areas like race, gender, sexuality, society, and culture.
It’s commonly assumed that college campuses are bastions of practical, fact-based learning, but it depends entirely on the discipline. Some courses are more focused on promoting specific ideologies than imparting knowledge about the world.
Few understand just how intellectually bankrupt and steeped in pseudoscience that many fields in the Humanities are.
Some disciplines are designed specifically to breed leftist activists, which are not concerned in objective truth, but in their truth, and how it can be applied to better the lives of the identity groups they deem to be “marginalized.”
This sounds like a noble goal, but it often flies in the face of Enlightenment principles, science, reason, and the pursuit of objective truth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What ideology is driving campus protests against Israel?
Atrocities are committed all over the world, yet students at prominent colleges across the US have spent weeks in encampments protesting Israel, a Western liberal democracy and the world’s only Jewish state. 🧵
Students don’t care about the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in China.
Or the oppression of women in Afghanistan by the Taliban’s return to power.
Or the systematic torture, sexual slavery, and mass killings of Yezidi women by ISIS.
They don’t care about the humanitarian crisis in Syria. Or Myanmar, or Yemen, or North Korea, South Sudan, Eritrea, or Saudi Arabia.
Why do students overlook these human rights abuses happening around the globe?
This is due to a widespread theoretical approach taught in American universities.
Students are taught to view society through a binary lens, where individuals and groups are categorized as either oppressors or oppressed.
Often, this oppression is viewed through the lens of race. Anyone with white skin belongs to an oppressor class and people with nonwhite skin are the oppressed.
Left-wing antisemitism entails prejudice, discrimination, or hostility against Jews, based on leftist ideologies. It's especially insidious, as it often masquerades as part of a broader "Social Justice" movement.
How does antisemitism on the left compare to the far-right?
Political horseshoe theory illustrates similarities between far-left and far-right antisemitism. Despite ideological differences, both extremes view Jews as a singular malevolent group with excessive power.
Far-right antisemitism is often overt and easily identifiable, while left-wing antisemitism is typically more subtle, making it more prevalent and socially acceptable among progressives.
What does left-wing antisemitism look like?
Labeling Jews as 'Oppressors': Jews are framed as “privileged” and “oppressors” within an “intersectional” academic framework, disregarding their diverse experiences and history of persecution.
Anti-Zionism: While criticizing Israeli policies is not inherently antisemitic, denying Jewish self-determination or deeming Israel illegitimate can be.
Collective Guilt: Holding all Jews accountable for Israel's actions constitutes a form of antisemitism.
Selective Outrage: Disproportionate criticism of Israel while overlooking similar or worse actions by other countries reflects a bias against Jews.
Holocaust Revisionism: Denying or downplaying the Holocaust, often disguised as questioning historical narratives or criticizing Israel, is a form of antisemitism sometimes found on the left.
Anti-racism, as a concept and approach, was developed by proponents of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Intersectionality. It was launched into popularity in 2020, especially by Ibram X. Kendi’s book, “How to Be Anti-Racist.” 🧵
This slideshow is adapted from a guide by @newdiscourses that compares anti-racism with the traditional way of dealing with racism, through philosophical liberalism (not to be confused with political liberalism associated with the left).
Anti-racism is not the same as being against racism.
It is an ideological approach that unfairly casts all white people as racists. It labels Jewish people as “white adjacent” and benefitting from, or complicit in, “white supremacy” and the “oppression” of other minorities.
Woke antisemitism is a progressive dogma that portrays Jews as white, privileged, and complicit in white supremacy, thus viewing them as oppressors. Initially a set of academic concepts, it has gained widespread acceptance on the left.
Wokeism, or Critical Social Justice, is a specific ideological approach to addressing perceived injustices between identity groups. It originates from a flawed academic field driven by political agendas rather than a commitment to the pursuit of truth. archive.is/TjTSW
Woke ideology is concerned with power dynamics. It posits an overly simplistic model of society that categorizes people by their group identity and ranks them as either “oppressors” or “oppressed” in a winner-takes-all conflict. afterbabel.com/p/victim-oppre…