Here's yet another article blaming scientists for the popularity of the lab leak theory, this time from Jane Qiu: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I'm kind of surprised by this one because, unlike most other journalists, @janeqiuchina has actually done some good investigative journalism about covid origins and has talked to primary sources: technologyreview.com/2022/02/09/104…
And she has written about the still active wildlife trade which could trigger another pandemic: nature.com/articles/d4158…
A common argument for the lab leak theory is that Wuhan is 1,000 miles from the bat viruses most similar to SARS-CoV-2, therefore the virus must be unnatural.
The big problem with this argument is both SARS1 and MERS were found similarly far away from the closest bat viruses.
🧵
The first known SARS case happened in November 2002, in Foshan.
The closest known bat virus to SARS was found 11 years later, in a Yunnan province cave.
Yunnan is over 1,000 kilometers away from where SARS was first found in humans.
SARS was also found in Hubei (the province that Wuhan is in) in 2003, so we know these viruses can naturally travel from Yunnan to Hubei. web.archive.org/web/2021112019…
In a 2021 poll in China, 53% of people answered that Covid came from the US: mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/2…
More than half of those people think Covid specifically came from a US lab, while some of them think it came from US "wet markets" or from US frozen food.
Only 12% of Chinese people blame Chinese wet markets, and less than 1% blame Chinese labs.
Normally, when a single case of Covid starts an outbreak, it starts a single polytomy. We've observed this happening again and again, around the world.
In Wuhan, there are 2 polytomies. Pekar theorized that was from 2 spillovers.