.@Optimism just broke the news that their fraud proofs are live, but wtf does that mean and how does it help you?
Here are some pictures to explain the changes and why they matter.
FRAUD PROOF UNLOCK TLDR
🔴 Bridged assets (ETH, ERC-20s, etc) on OP Mainnet can be withdrawn back to Ethereum without Optimism's input
🔴 Anyone can review the OP Mainnet transactions and challenge them if they're invalid
WITHOUT FRAUD PROOFS
This is the relationship with OP's L2 that you were used to, and it's relationship to Ethereum, whether you knew it or not.
In this paradigm, you would bridge in your assets (typically ETH) and play around on the chain with those assets. Owned amounts would be updated, new owners would be assigned and net-new assets would be created just like they would any other blockchain.
Recall though; the reason we use L2's in the first place is in an effort to scale Ethereum while preserving key properties like permissionless execution and asset sovereignty. In order to maintain those properties for their users Optimism must record what's happening locally and not only inform Ethereum of asset changes but be able to prove that it's telling the truth - this is what has been missing all this time, and what fraud proofs allow.
Up until now Ethereum had no way of knowing the truth about ownership, which means it relied on Optimism to tell it when and who could take their ETH back out of Optimism.
Enter: Fault Dispute System
WITH FRAUD PROOFS
Going forward, here's how things will look: mostly the same, with the addition of an onchain dispute system on mainnet:
What will users dispute? When others are claiming to own assets that they actually don't.
That's it: Optimism has armed users with the ability to prove when someone else is lying about what they own (and are attempting to move/withdraw). Given this ecosystem primitive, it means we can grant anyone withdrawal powers because others are incentivized to catch them and keep the system honest.
LOOKING FORWARD
With these changes, OP Mainnet will become the second chain in the top 10 by TVL to achieve Stage 1 decentralization (per @l2beat), but we could see others like Base and Mantle implement the new system in shoter(er) order as they benefit from all changes to the OPStack (i.e. OP Mainnet and those chains share code so they can all contribute and borrow developments).
Here's a quick image I whipped up to demonstrate how these changes are implemented and adopted amongst these chain clusters:
That should do it.
If you'd like to learn more about Optimism, the OP Superchain, or the L2 ecosystem writ large @binji_x is a great follow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alright, lets talk about @timedotfun and how it turns your time in to a redeemable, composable currency.
We'll do this in two parts, like my "WTF is..." articles to save some of you time.
------------------
SHORT VERSION
Platform
🔹Mobile (PWA) + Desktop
🔹Tokenizes your time (minutes)
🔹Priced on bonding curve (global)
🔹Minutes are "redeemed" for events (calls, direct messages, group chats, etc)
🔹95% of redeemed value, 2% trading fees go to creator
🔹Creator determines which features are redeemable (and their prices)
My Commentary
🔹The team has very specifically gone after Friendtech's creator monetization vertical and addressed key weaknesses (platform fees, no redemption or recurring revenue models, rigid contracts, lack of sustainable 3rd party extensibility)
🔹Product is polished and feature-rich
🔹Redemption features provides the release valve needed in an eco supported by a bonding curve
🔹Sustainable 3rd party extensibility of the contracts could turn this from an app to a protocol (huge)
🔹Headwinds will be FT psychological trauma, fostering an active eco and enforcing creator redemptions
If you want more details (and pictures) - keep reading.
------------------
LONG VERSION
First - Let's address the SocialFi elephant in the room: Friendtech (and how this isn't that).
If anything - it's an opinionated evolution.
FT displayed a lot of potential that everyone kinda saw, but the app, team and vision was ultimately not great at any of them.
Thus, opinionated apps are coming to market targeting subsets of the properties within SocialFi.
Per the above, time is targeting creator monetization, social speculation and the ability to serve as a platform for 3rd party apps atop it's ledger/currency (minutes).
All things I was personally excited about (and which FT didn't capitalize on).
Okay, but how and why is it different?
Glad you asked.
First, lets lay the foundation of the protocol:
🔹Social login (X)
🔹Time (minutes) are priced on bonding curve
🔹You can redeem minutes for events
🔹Events are meetings (optional), direct Q&A messages and access to a group chat
I like pictures:
The thing to note with the above, is the flow of capital (fees) and configurability (minimum redemption price).
Lets zoom in on the bonding curve so you can see what I mean:
Breaking it down:
🔹Creator has the power to set a minimum price before people can redeem for meetings or get access to GC (so you're not hopping on a call for sheckles)
🔹All events are a request/accept model, so you can have people send messages or ask for meetings, but unless you as the creator accept it/respond they won't pay out and return to purchaser in-full.
🔹When redeemed, a few things happen:
- Those minutes are sold in to the curve (supply/price down)
- The value from that sale goes to the creator (95%), holders (~2%), referee (0.5% [optional]) and platform (2.5%)
🔹For group chats the redemption is automatic every X weeks for Y minutes (set by creator), so it simulates a subscription model
🔹Outside of redemption, trades can still take place for speculatoooors where fees are split between Creator, Holders and the platform.
Both flows, visualized:
That covers the basic setup of what's in place today.
So what are my thoughts? I'll lay out a bear and bull.
Bull Thesis
@timedotfun is used for sustainable, one-time user events but also turns in to a protocol where developers build secondary, sustainable interfaces and experiences for creators to redeem events on.
More experiences. More creators. More devs.
You saw some of this with friendtech where ownership of keys granted you access to a 3rd party tools, but that wasn't sustainable for those devs. FT had a 50% fee take rate and without redemption or transferability the only income source was trading volatility. Not great.
Here, devs have:
- A cut of the 95% creator fees
- Can be whitelisted to bypass restricting methods (transferability, minimum limits, etc)
- An API for obtaining internal information
Best part? The team is showing you the way. Subscriptions and group chats leverage this feature just like any 3rd party dev would. It works. Today.
Bear Thesis / Headwinds
In short: cold start, unfamiliar pricing schemes and ensuring creators honor their inbound.
If the creators don't push people to the platform for redeeming their time or if the users don't feel like creators are active enough, both sides could walk away unhappy.
They've already implemented notifications for both email and text (on top of the PWA notis), so this should help the latter problem, but it might feel like a ghost town early on.
The other major headwind I could see is simply pricing ones self being too cumbersome for users which leads to them never even getting set up.
"How much am I worth per-minute?"
"Why do I have to price in ETH? What if it goes down?"
"Well if my minutes are X and my subs are Y but I want to do meetings for Z which would mean my hourly is...?" (you get the idea)
Conclusion
Time is a very thoughtful and well-executed iteration in the SocialFi space, and I could see it gaining steam for people with tons of inbound.
As with any early projects it has some minor UX hitches that make things frustrating (like pricing your minutes and having to do hour/minute conversions to see what you're setting at), but in general the platform is intuitive.
Another promising app out of @alliancedao.
Thanks
Shoutout to @0xKawz and @timed. I talked to the team several weeks ago purely based on SocialFi tweets and when asked about doing a review was given no restrictions - just my honest thoughts and a holistic view.
I'm very happy to announce that after digging in deeper, I'm bullish and will start pushing redemptions to the platform to get a better feel for how it could mature.
@timedotfun If you want to give it a go, here's a signup (yes ref).
I always do these and remember things I wanted to say, so I'll just append them:
- the most bullish thing for the platform is that it requires literally no one else to be useful to you. You don't need a thriving trader market - it's just helpful.
You can login in and when someone asks for a DM or meeting - just point them to the site. You set the redemption threshold so that 1 person buys and redeems. Ezpz.
Sorry bros - @unichain is bearish for $ETH (the asset).
...but I'm also incapable of seeing new mechanisms and drawing technical diagrams to help people understand them, so I'll FUD it while detailing some of the cool tech. ☺️🧵
WTF is Unichain?
It's @Uniswap's Defi-focused L2 within the OP Superchain.
What does that mean? It is joining a collective of L2s that share revenue and promise interoperability.
Today, Superchain accounts for ~44% (!) of all L2 fees.
Chat, is this enough to live in Southeast Asia for the rest of the year?
(Yes it is)
Here's what my one-bag looks like, and what I'll live out of for the rest of the year following Token 2049. 🧵☺️
Toiletries
Pretty basic stuff here, optimizing for space.
Notables:
- Travel electronic toothbrush (quip)
- Carabiner because shelf space can be hard to come by on the road
- Exfoliant + soft hand towel combo
- Larger travel towel just in case
Electronics
Enough to have a proper workstation on the road.
Notables
- Rooster stand
- Double pixel buds for long listening
- Large external battery for either laptop or phone
- Compact keyboard
- Road tripod + mics for calls, pods and butt pics
- Plug adapter