Is SARS-CoV-2 running out of evolutionary space? Is variant evolution slowing down? Is immune escape unlikely anymore? Let's explore. π§΅
Here are some phylogenies (evolutionary trees) of the major SARS-CoV-2 variant lineages from . One is in radial format, the other unrooted, but they show the same information and are both scaled to divergence (number of mutations). nextstrain.org
And here are some plots of mutations over time, again from . There is no sign of this rate of accumulation of mutations slowing down (if anything, more recent variants are above the trend line). nextstrain.org
It's worth looking at spike (S1) mutations specifically. Note two things here:
1) We're still getting a LOT of new mutations.
2) These come in rather discrete jumps, then a flatter plateau. That's because of recombination or within-host evolution in persistent infections.
Here is some info on immune escape and ACE2 binding -- that is, how well the variant avoids existing antibodies and how well it can attach to the receptors on our cells. The top right is the "uh oh" zone where it is good at both. From . nextstrain.org
Looking at global trends for immune escape and ACE2 binding for the last 20 days, we see lots of variants with very high immune escape compared to BA.2, and some that also have high ACE2 binding. Note the change between BA.2.86 (circled) and its descendants. From @RajlabN.
Here's immune escape (vs. BA.2) over time, from . Again, the virus is not running out of ways to escape current immunity (which is partial, temporary, and changing according to vaccinations and infections). From . nextstrain.org nextstrain.org
Why does this keep happening, contrary to minimizer assumptions? Because:
1) Orgel's second rule: "Evolution is cleverer than you are".
2) This:
A reminder about Greek letters and the decision to keep calling everything "Omicron".
Two new variants are competing for dominance: NB.1.8.1 and XFG. We recently nicknamed NB.1.8.1 "Nimbus", and it's pretty clear that XFG deserves a nickname as well. Keeping with the meteorological theme, XFG = "Stratus".
Here's some more info about Nimbus and Stratus. π§΅
1/
There are two main ways by which divergent variants may evolve within single hosts: evolution during chronic infection and recombination during simultaneous infection with more than one variant. Nimbus (NB.1.8.1) and Stratus (XFG) have both mechanisms in their ancestries.
2/
Stratus (XFG) is a recombinant of LF.7 x LP.8.1.2 -- both of which descendants of BA.2.86, which itself had evolved within someone infected for ~2 years.
Nimbus (NB.1.8.1) is getting a fair bit of attention, but it's not the only SARS-CoV-2 variant worth watching. Here's a link to info about a few more, all of which have arisen either through within-host evolution during chronic infection and/or within-host recombination.
π§΅
1/
First, a reminder that Nimbus (NB.1.8.1) is a triple recombinant with both BA.2.86 and XBB ancestry -- that is, it has multiple recombination events and chronic infections in its evolutionary history. Here's a thread I wrote about it:
The last variant to receive an informal nickname was BA.2.86 "Pirola" nearly two years ago, back in August 2023. Since then, it has been a prolonged "variant soup" phase, with descendants of BA.2.86 arising, gaining prominence, and then falling in frequency.
2/
A prolonged variant soup phase involving the Pirola clan does not mean there was no within-host evolution occurring. It just meant that nothing had gotten back into the general population that could compete with the many, many descendants of BA.2.86.
3/
BC was where the NDP did best last election, and this time it went Lib and Con.
So, we essentially traded a Liberal minority with progressive parties being very influential to a Liberal minority with a huge Conservative opposition and minimal progressive representation.
The fact that 41.4% voted Con (vs. 43.5% Lib) isn't a good sign either.
Yes, I'm relieved that it's not Poilievre as PM and I'm glad he lost his seat. But beyond that, we're not in a very good place overall. The major rightward shift isn't going to be good, especially when the Liberals eventually lose to the Conservatives.
It's very important to be clear about what is happening in the Canadian election and how progressives need to approach it. π§΅
The LPC surge toward a majority is due primarily to a collapse of support for the NDP and Bloc, and much less so a drop in support for the CPC.
1/
This means that the Libs are mostly picking up progressive voters who are planning to vote strategically to stop the Cons. They are not picking up huge numbers of "moderate conservatives".
Cons support is generally committed but Libs support isn't.
Thoughts on pandemics, inclusion, annexation, Indigenous issues, climate, genocide, and more and the connections I see among them. I fully acknowledge that I am writing this from a position of substantial intersectional privilege.
π§΅
1/
I really hoped that the (ongoing) SARS-CoV-2 pandemic would inspire us to make meaningful, positive changes in society. Indeed, early on it seemed like privileged people finally understood what it was like to lack access to things we otherwise take for granted.
2/
Sadly, but perhaps predictably, we instead rushed back to the status quo as quickly as we could. If anything, things are worse now in terms of public health, accessibility and inclusion, and global health equity. Infectious disease has been actively normalized.
3/